The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Medication Errors in Pediatrics: Proposals to Improve the Quality and Safety of Care Through Clinical Risk Management
Open accessAbstract
Medication errors represent one of the most common causes of adverse events in pediatrics and are widely reported in the literature. Despite the awareness that children are at increased risk for medication errors, little is known about the real incidence of the phenomenon. Most studies have focused on prescription, although medication errors also include transcription, dispensing, dosage, administration, and certification errors. Known risk factors for therapeutic errors include parenteral infusions, oral fluid administration, and tablet splitting, as well as the off-label use of drugs with dosages taken from adult literature. Emergency Departments and Intensive Care Units constitute the care areas mainly affected by the phenomenon in the hospital setting. The present paper aims to identify the risk profiles in pediatric therapy to outline adequate preventive strategies. Precisely, through the analysis of the available evidence, solutions such as standardization of recommended doses for children, electronic prescribing, targeted training of healthcare professionals, and implementation of reporting systems will be indicated for the prevention of medication errors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PMSC encompasses competencies including accurate medication calculation, safe administration practices, clinical decision-making, and effective communication with caregivers.
“PMSC encompasses competencies including accurate medication calculation, safe administration practices, clinical decision-making, and effective communication with caregivers [1,4,5].”
From Development and pilot evaluation of an AI-based pediatric medication safety virtual simulation program for nursing students: a quasi-experimental study in South Korea (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
The Preventive Strategies section discusses pediatric dose calculations, safe medication administration, and training for healthcare personnel and caregivers (page not provided). It does not define PMSC or identify clinical decision-making and effective communication with caregivers as competencies within it. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe incidence of medication errors in pediatric patients is approximately 3 times higher than in adults.
“Due to these characteristics, the incidence of medication errors in pediatric patients has been reported to be approximately 3 times higher than in adults, highlighting medication safety as a particularly critical issue in pediatric care settings [1].”
From Development and pilot evaluation of an AI-based pediatric medication safety virtual simulation program for nursing students: a quasi-experimental study in South Korea (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
The Epidemiology > Inpatient Setting section reports higher medication-error rates in pediatric patients (31%) than in adults (13%). That is about 2.4 times the adult rate, not approximately three times, and the comparison comes from a reporting program rather than an established overall incidence. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 108
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mohr, 2005, Learning from errors in ambulatory pediatrics, 355
Metadata
- Authors
- D'Errico, S., Zanon, M., Radaelli, D., Padovano, M., Santurro, A., Scopetti, M., Frati, P., & Fineschi, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Trieste (IT)
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- University of Salerno (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Fineschi, Vittorio
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Medicine
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2022-01-14
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 814100-814100
- ISSN
- 2296-858X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8795662
- OpenAlex
- W4205975764
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- medication errors, pediatrics, clinical risk management, patient safety, adverse events, error prevention, electronic prescribing, medication administration errors, off-label drug use, emergency department, intensive care unit, health professions education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review