Cited by 108Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Medication Errors in Pediatrics: Proposals to Improve the Quality and Safety of Care Through Clinical Risk Management

Open access

Abstract

Medication errors represent one of the most common causes of adverse events in pediatrics and are widely reported in the literature. Despite the awareness that children are at increased risk for medication errors, little is known about the real incidence of the phenomenon. Most studies have focused on prescription, although medication errors also include transcription, dispensing, dosage, administration, and certification errors. Known risk factors for therapeutic errors include parenteral infusions, oral fluid administration, and tablet splitting, as well as the off-label use of drugs with dosages taken from adult literature. Emergency Departments and Intensive Care Units constitute the care areas mainly affected by the phenomenon in the hospital setting. The present paper aims to identify the risk profiles in pediatric therapy to outline adequate preventive strategies. Precisely, through the analysis of the available evidence, solutions such as standardization of recommended doses for children, electronic prescribing, targeted training of healthcare professionals, and implementation of reporting systems will be indicated for the prevention of medication errors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmed.2021.814100

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PMSC encompasses competencies including accurate medication calculation, safe administration practices, clinical decision-making, and effective communication with caregivers.

    “PMSC encompasses competencies including accurate medication calculation, safe administration practices, clinical decision-making, and effective communication with caregivers [1,4,5].”

    From Development and pilot evaluation of an AI-based pediatric medication safety virtual simulation program for nursing students: a quasi-experimental study in South Korea (2026) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Preventive Strategies section discusses pediatric dose calculations, safe medication administration, and training for healthcare personnel and caregivers (page not provided). It does not define PMSC or identify clinical decision-making and effective communication with caregivers as competencies within it. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The incidence of medication errors in pediatric patients is approximately 3 times higher than in adults.

    “Due to these characteristics, the incidence of medication errors in pediatric patients has been reported to be approximately 3 times higher than in adults, highlighting medication safety as a particularly critical issue in pediatric care settings [1].”

    From Development and pilot evaluation of an AI-based pediatric medication safety virtual simulation program for nursing students: a quasi-experimental study in South Korea (2026) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Epidemiology > Inpatient Setting section reports higher medication-error rates in pediatric patients (31%) than in adults (13%). That is about 2.4 times the adult rate, not approximately three times, and the comparison comes from a reporting program rather than an established overall incidence. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 108

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mohr, 2005, Learning from errors in ambulatory pediatrics, 355

Metadata

Authors
D'Errico, S., Zanon, M., Radaelli, D., Padovano, M., Santurro, A., Scopetti, M., Frati, P., & Fineschi, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Trieste (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Salerno (IT)
Corresponding author
Fineschi, Vittorio
Venue
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2022-01-14
Volume
8
Pages
814100-814100
ISSN
2296-858X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205975764
Cited by
108
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
medication errors, pediatrics, clinical risk management, patient safety, adverse events, error prevention, electronic prescribing, medication administration errors, off-label drug use, emergency department, intensive care unit, health professions education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review