Cited by 200Healthcare RegulationAnimal testing and alternativesOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

Toxic or not toxic? The specifications of the standard ISO 10993-5 are not explicit enough to yield comparable results in the cytotoxicity assessment of an identical medical device

Open access
Gruber, Sarah, Nickel, Angela·2023·Frontiers in Medical Technology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Medical device manufacturers are obliged to prove the biocompatibility of their products when they come into contact with the human body. The requirements for the biological evaluation of medical devices are specified by the international standard series ISO 10993. Part five of this series describes the performance of in vitro cytotoxicity tests. This test evaluates the effects of medical device use on cell health. The existence of the specific standard suggests that the tests will produce reliable and comparable results. However, the ISO 10993-5 offers wide latitude in the test specifications. In the past, we noticed inconsistencies of the results from different laboratories. Objective: To determine if the specifications of the standard ISO 10993-5 are explicit to ensure the comparability of test results and, if not, identify potential influencing factors. Methods: An interlaboratory comparison was conducted for the in vitro cytotoxicity test according to ISO 10993-5. Fifty-two international laboratories evaluated the cytotoxicity for two unknown samples. One was polyethylene (PE) tubing, which is expected to be non-cytotoxic and the other was polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing, for which a cytotoxic potential was presumed. All laboratories were asked to perform an elution test with predefined extraction specifications. The other test parameters were freely chosen by the laboratories according to the guidelines set by the standard. Results: To our surprise only 58 percent of the participating laboratories identified the cytotoxic potential of both materials as expected. Particularly for PVC a considerable variation of the results between the laboratories was observed [mean = 43 ± 30 (SD), min = 0, max = 100]. We showed that ten percent serum supplementation to the extraction medium, as well as longer incubation of the cells with the extract, greatly increased the test sensitivity for PVC. Conclusion: The results clearly show that the specifications set by the ISO 10993-5 are not explicit enough to obtain comparable results for an identical medical device. To set requirements that ensure reliable cytotoxicity assessments, further research will be necessary to identify the best test conditions for specific materials and/or devices and the standard needs to be revised accordingly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1195529

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In HaCaT keratinocyte test systems, cell viability over 70-80% at 24 h should be considered nontoxic.

    “In the HaCaT keratinocyte test systems, results with cell viability of over 70-80% at 24 h should be considered nontoxic [30 - 32].”

    From Formulation development, physical stability, and preliminary safety screening of cosmetic emulsions containing banana peel extract (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Methods (Data analysis; page unavailable) define cytotoxicity as cell viability reduced by more than 30% relative to untreated cells, supporting a nontoxic classification above 70%. The Results (Influence of cell culture setup on test sensitivity; page unavailable) say ISO 10993-5 specifies at least 24 hours of incubation. The paper does not establish a 70–80% threshold specifically for HaCaT keratinocytes at 24 hours. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interlaboratory studies show substantial variability in IC50 and related cytotoxicity metrics, frequently in the range of approximately 20% to >40%, depending on system and endpoint.

    “Interlaboratory studies further show substantial variability in IC50 and related cytotoxicity metrics, frequently in the range of approximately 20% to >40%, depending on system and endpoint (Tani et al., 1999; Gruber and Nickel, 2023).”

    From Cytotoxicity across OECD methods is not a single endpoint: context-dependent roles, variability and implications for decision-making (2026) · cites this paper as Gruber and Nickel, 2023

    The Results section (‘Outcome of the interlaboratory comparison: highly variable cytotoxicity test results for PVC’; page unavailable) reports substantial variation: only 62% of laboratories classified PVC as cytotoxic, and 42% did not classify at least one material as expected. It does not report interlaboratory variability in IC50 or establish the claimed approximately 20% to >40% range for IC50 and related metrics across systems and endpoints; its percentages describe classification outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [7]Li W Zhou J Xu Y. Study of the in vitro cytotoxicity testing of medical devices. Biomed Rep. (2015) 3: 617– 20. 10.3892/BR.2015.481 26405534 PMC4535150 · DOI
  2. [9]Li P Schille C Schweizer E Kimmerle-Müller E Rupp F Heiss A Selection of extraction medium influences cytotoxicity of zinc and its alloys. Acta Biomater. (2019) 98: 235– 45. 10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2019.03.013 30862550 · DOI
  3. [10]Liu X Xi T Zheng Y. Influence of the extraction parameters on the cytotoxicity test results of mg materials. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int. (2014) 24: 507– 15. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2014.09.005 · DOI
  4. [11]Jablonská E Kubásek J Vojtěch D Ruml T Lipov J. Test conditions can significantly affect the results of in vitro cytotoxicity testing of degradable metallic biomaterials. Sci Rep. (2021) 11: 1– 9. 10.1038/s41598-021-85019-6 33758226 PMC7987994 · DOI
  5. [12]Wataha JC Nelson SK Lockwood PE. Elemental release from dental casting alloys into biological media with and without protein. Dent Mater. (2001) 17: 409– 14. 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00099-3 11445208 · DOI
  6. [13]Wang J Witte F Xi T Zheng Y Yang K Yang Y Recommendation for modifying current cytotoxicity testing standards for biodegradable magnesium-based materials. Acta Biomater. (2015) 21: 237– 49. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.011 25890098 · DOI
  7. [14]Pastor JC Coco RM Fernandez-Bueno I Alonso-Alonso ML Medina J Sanz-Arranz A Acute retinal damage after using a toxic perfluoro-octance for vitreo-retinal surgery. Retina. (2017) 37: 1140– 51. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001680 28538613 · DOI
  8. [15]Srivastava GK Alonso-Alonso ML Fernandez-Bueno I Garcia-Gutierrez MT Rull F Medina J Comparison between direct contact and extract exposure methods for PFO cytotoxicity evaluation. Sci Rep. (2018) 8: 1– 9. 10.1038/s41598-018-19428-5 29362382 PMC5780508 · DOI
  9. [17]Marchant RE Anderson JM Dillingham EO. In vivo biocompatibility studies. VII. Inflammatory response to polyethylene and to a cytotoxic polyvinylchloride. J Biomed Mater Res. (1986) 20: 37– 50. 10.1002/JBM.820200105 3081521 · DOI
  10. [20]Bernard L Cueff R Breysse C Décaudin B Sautou V. Migrability of PVC plasticizers from medical devices into a simulant of infused solutions. Int J Pharm. (2015) 485: 341– 7. 10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2015.03.030 25796128 · DOI
  11. [21]Tickner J. Health risks posed by use of Di2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) in PVC medical devices: a critical review health and sustainability view project history and development of medical journals view project. (2001). p. 100– 11. 10.1002/1097-0274(200101)39:13.0.CO;2-Q 11148020 · DOI
  12. [22]European Union. Opinion on the safety of medical devices containing DEHP plasticized PVC or other plasticizers on neonates and other groups possibly at risk (2015 update). (2015). 10.2772/45179 26854686 · DOI
  13. [29]Chiellini F Ferri M Morelli A Dipaola L Latini G. Perspectives on alternatives to phthalate plasticized poly(vinyl chloride) in medical devices applications. Prog Polym Sci. (2013) 38: 1067– 88. 10.1016/J.PROGPOLYMSCI.2013.03.001 · DOI
  14. [30]Chawla AS Hinberg I. Leaching of plasticizers from and surface characterization of PVC blood platelet bags. Biomater Artif Cells Immobilization Biotechnol. (1991) 19: 761– 83. 10.3109/10731199109117853 1810409 · DOI
  15. [31]Duta OC Maximov M Trusca R Ficai A Ficai D Ilie CI Advanced drug-eluting poly (vinyl chloride) surfaces deposited by spin coating. Medicina (B Aires). (2019) 55(8): 421– 00. 10.3390/MEDICINA55080421 PMC6723965 31366186 · DOI
  16. [34]Wen X Wang R Jia X Tang J He X. In vitro cytotoxicity study of nickel Ion. Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi. (2015) 39: 212– 5. PMID: 26524790. 26524790
  17. [35]Ciapetti G Cenni E Pratelli L Pizzoferrato A. In vitro evaluation of cell/biomaterial interaction by MTT assay. Biomaterials. (1993) 14: 359– 64. 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90055-7 8507779 · DOI
  18. [36]Roehm NW Rodgers GH Hatfield SM Glasebrook AL. An improved colorimetric assay for cell proliferation and viability utilizing the tetrazolium salt XTT. J Immunol Methods. (1991) 142: 257– 65. 10.1016/0022-1759(91)90114-U 1919029 · DOI
  19. [37]Repetto G del Peso A Zurita JL. Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc. (2008) 3: 1125– 31. 10.1038/nprot.2008.75 18600217 · DOI
  20. [38]Podgórski R Wojasiński M Ciach T. Nanofibrous materials affect the reaction of cytotoxicity assays. Sci Rep. (2022) 12: 1– 12. 10.1038/s41598-022-13002-w 35641539 PMC9156782 · DOI
  21. [39]Liu X Rodeheaver DP White JC Wright AM Walker LM Zhang F A comparison of in vitro cytotoxicity assays in medical device regulatory studies. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. (2018) 97: 24– 32. 10.1016/J.YRTPH.2018.06.003 29885342 · DOI
  22. [40]Gruber S Nickel A. Toxic or not toxic? Interlaboratory comparison reveals almost fifty-fifty chance in the cytotoxicity assessment (ISO 10993-5) of an identical medical device. medRxiv [Preprint]. (2023). Available at: 10.1101/2023.03.28.23287847 PMC10304299 37388758 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gruber, S., & Nickel, A.
Affiliations
Johner Institut (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Gruber, Sarah
Venue
Frontiers in Medical Technology
Published
2023-06-14
Volume
5
Pages
1195529-1195529
ISSN
2673-3129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380684791
Cited by
200
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 113 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 3
FWCI
44.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Medical Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Keywords
ISO 10993-5, cytotoxicity assay, medical device safety, inter-laboratory variability, test result comparability, PVC pipes, polyethylene pipes, elution test, serum supplementation, test sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review