Bile resistance mechanisms in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium
Open accessAbstract
Probiotics are live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host. Most of the probiotic bacteria currently available in the market belong to the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, and specific health-promoting activities, such as treatment of diarrhea or amelioration of gastrointestinal discomfort, have been attributed to them. In order to be able to survive the gastrointestinal transit and transiently colonize our gut, these bacteria must be able to counteract the deleterious action of bile salts, which are the main components of bile. Bile salts are detergent-like biological substances synthesized in the liver from cholesterol. Host enzymes conjugate the newly synthesized free bile acids in the liver with the amino acids glycine or taurine, generating conjugated bile salts. These compounds are stored in the gall bladder and they are released into the duodenum during digestion to perform their physiological function, which is the solubilization of fat coming from diet. These bile salts possess strong antimicrobial activity, since they are able to disorganize the structure of the cell membrane, as well as trigger DNA damage. This means that bacteria inhabiting our intestinal tract must have intrinsic resistance mechanisms to cope with bile salts. To do that, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium display a variety of proteins devoted to the efflux of bile salts or protons, to modify sugar metabolism or to prevent protein misfolding. In this manuscript, we review and discuss specific bile resistance mechanisms, as well as the processes responsible for the adaptation of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli to bile.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adhesion of probiotic bacteria to intestinal cells of the host is an important feature in conferral of health benefits.
“Finally, the adhesion of probiotic bacteria to the intestinal cells of the host is an important feature in the conferral of health benefits [47].”
From The Biological Role of the S-Layer Produced by Lactobacillus helveticus 34.9 in Cell Protection and Its Probiotic Properties (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
The section on changes in central metabolic pathways calls adhesion a probiotic trait, and the Abstract says probiotics confer health benefits. The paper does not establish that adhesion specifically to host intestinal cells is important for conferring those benefits; its discussion of adhesion to cell lines and mucus concerns bile adaptation and colonization. (LLM, conf=0.80)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 548
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hofmann A. F. (1994). “Bile acids,” In The Liver: Biology and Pathobiology eds Arias I. M. Boyer J. L. Fausto N. Jackoby D. A. Schachter D. A. Shafritz D. A. (New York: Raven Press Ltd) 677– 718
- Authors
- Ruiz, L., Margolles, A., & Sánchez, B.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Sánchez, Borja
- ORCID
- Sánchez, Borja
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 396-396
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3872040
- OpenAlex
- W2040011766
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 22.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (00012)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- bile resistance, bile salts, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, probiotics, bile salt hydrolase, cell membrane damage, DNA damage, sugar metabolism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review