The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Frontiers in Microbiology
Open accessAbstract
Hosts used for the production of recombinant proteins are typically high-protein secreting mutant strains that have been selected for a specific purpose, such as efficient production of cellulose-degrading enzymes. Somewhat surprisingly, sequencing of the genomes of a series of mutant strains of the cellulolytic Trichoderma reesei, widely used as an expression host for recombinant gene products, has shed very little light on the nature of changes that boost high-level protein secretion. While it is generally agreed and shown that protein secretion in filamentous fungi occurs mainly through the hyphal tip, there is growing evidence that secretion of proteins also takes place in sub-apical regions. Attempts to increase correct folding and thereby the yields of heterologous proteins in fungal hosts by co-expression of cellular chaperones and foldases have resulted in variable success; underlying reasons have been explored mainly at the transcriptional level. The observed physiological changes in fungal strains experiencing increasing stress through protein overexpression under strong gene promoters also reflect the challenge the host organisms are experiencing. It is evident, that as with other eukaryotes, fungal endoplasmic reticulum is a highly dynamic structure. Considering the above, there is an emerging body of work exploring the use of weaker expression promoters to avoid undue stress. Filamentous fungi have been hailed as candidates for the production of pharmaceutically relevant proteins for therapeutic use. One of the biggest challenges in terms of fungally produced heterologous gene products is their mode of glycosylation; fungi lack the functionally important terminal sialylation of the glycans that occurs in mammalian cells. Finally, exploration of the metabolic pathways and fluxes together with the development of sophisticated fermentation protocols may result in new strategies to produce recombinant proteins in filamentous fungi.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Health benefits of fermented foods
Şanlier, N., Gökcen, B. B., & Sezgin, A. C. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2017.1383355 · Cited by 789
The progress of gut microbiome research related to brain disorders
Zhu, S., Jiang, Y., Xu, K., Cui, M., Ye, W., Zhao, G., Jin, L., & Chen, X. (2020) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-020-1705-z · Cited by 419
Sun, G. Y., Li, R., Cui, J., Hannink, M., Gu, Z., Fritsche, K. L., Lubahn, D. B., & Simonyi, A. (2016) · NeuroMolecular Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12017-016-8411-0 · Cited by 95
Jiang, C.-H., Xie, Y.-S., Zhu, K., Wang, N., Li, Z.-J., Yu, G.-J., & Guo, J.-H. (2019) · Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s10725-018-00473-z · Cited by 80
Gut-microbiota derived bioactive metabolites and their functions in host physiology
Debnath, N., Kumar, R., Kumar, A., Mehta, P. K., & Yadav, A. K. (2021) · Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews · doi:10.1080/02648725.2021.1989847 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2015-02-18
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 75-75
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1509142546
- Cited by
- 1,611
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frontiers in Microbiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00075
- The paper
- Frontiers in Microbiology. (2015). Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.