CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 124Fermentation and Sensory AnalysisYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesHorticultural and Viticultural Research

Hanseniaspora uvarum from Winemaking Environments Show Spatial and Temporal Genetic Clustering

Open access
Albertin, Warren, Setati, Mathabatha E., Miot-Sertier, Cécile, Mostert, Talitha T., Colonna-Ceccaldi, Benoit, Coulon, Joana, Girard, Patrick, Moine, Virginie +5 more·2016·Frontiers in Microbiology
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01569PMC PMC4718985
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Hanseniaspora uvarum is one of the most abundant yeast species found on grapes and in grape must, at least before the onset of alcoholic fermentation (AF) which is usually performed by Saccharomyces species. The aim of this study was to characterize the genetic and phenotypic variability within the H. uvarum species. One hundred and fifteen strains isolated from winemaking environments in different geographical origins were analyzed using 11 microsatellite markers and a subset of 47 strains were analyzed by AFLP. H. uvarum isolates clustered mainly on the basis of their geographical localization as revealed by microsatellites. In addition, a strong clustering based on year of isolation was evidenced, indicating that the genetic diversity of H. uvarum isolates was related to both spatial and temporal variations. Conversely, clustering analysis based on AFLP data provided a different picture with groups showing no particular characteristics, but provided higher strain discrimination. This result indicated that AFLP approaches are inadequate to establish the genetic relationship between individuals, but allowed good strain discrimination. At the phenotypic level, several extracellular enzymatic activities of enological relevance (pectinase, chitinase, protease, β-glucosidase) were measured but showed low diversity. The impact of environmental factors of enological interest (temperature, anaerobia, and copper addition) on growth was also assessed and showed poor variation. Altogether, this work provided both new analytical tool (microsatellites) and new insights into the genetic and phenotypic diversity of H. uvarum, a yeast species that has previously been identified as a potential candidate for co-inoculation in grape must, but whose intraspecific variability had never been fully assessed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01569

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hanseniaspora species are widespread and frequent in the environment, mostly studied with respect to their occurrence on grapes and winemaking, and their antagonistic activity against green mould of citrus or B. cinerea has been shown.

    “Hanseniaspora species are widespread and frequent in the environment, mostly studied with respect to their occurrence on grapes and winemaking, and their antagonistic activity against green mould of citrus or B. cinerea was shown [78–82].”

    From Competition assays and physiological experiments of soil and phyllosphere yeasts identify Candida subhashii as a novel antagonist of filamentous fungi (2017) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Introduction describes H. uvarum as occurring in diverse environments, frequently on grapes and in fermentation, and reports its antagonistic properties against Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium spp. on citrus. It does not establish these claims for Hanseniaspora species generally, say that they have mostly been studied in relation to grapes and winemaking, or specifically identify the citrus disease as green mould. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 108

  1. Agrawal T. Kotasthane A. S. (2012). Chitinolytic assay of indigenous Trichoderma isolates collected from different geographical locations of Chhattisgarh in Central India. Springerplus 1: 73. 10.1186/2193-1801-1-73 23526575 PMC3602610 · DOI
  2. Albertin W. Chasseriaud L. Comte G. Panfili A. Delcamp A. Salin F.. (2014a). Winemaking and bioprocesses strongly shaped the genetic diversity of the ubiquitous yeast Torulaspora delbrueckii. PLoS ONE 9: e94246. 10.1371/journal.pone.0094246 24718638 PMC3981792 · DOI
  3. Albertin W. Miot-Sertier C. Bely M. Marullo P. Coulon J. Moine V.. (2014b). Oenological prefermentation practices strongly impact yeast population dynamics and alcoholic fermentation kinetics in Chardonnay grape must. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 178, 87– 97. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.03.009 24681710 · DOI
  4. Albertin W. Panfili A. Miot-Sertier C. Goulielmakis A. Delcamp A. Salin F.. (2014c). Development of microsatellite markers for the rapid and reliable genotyping of Brettanomyces bruxellensis at strain level. Food Microbiol. 42, 188– 195. 10.1016/j.fm.2014.03.012 24929736 · DOI
  5. Almeida P. Gonçalves C. Teixeira S. Libkind D. Bontrager M. Masneuf-Pomarède I.. (2014). A Gondwanan imprint on global diversity and domestication of wine and cider yeast Saccharomyces uvarum. Nat. Commun. 5: 4044. 10.1038/ncomms5044 24887054 PMC5081218 · DOI
  6. Angioni A. Caboni P. Garau A. Farris A. Orro D. Budroni M.. (2007). In vitro interaction between ochratoxin A and different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kloeckera apiculata. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55, 2043– 2048. 10.1021/jf062768u 17279767 · DOI
  7. Basha H. Ramanujam B. (2014). Growth promotion effect of Pichia guilliermondii in chilli and biocontrol potential of Hanseniaspora uvarum against Colletotrichum capsici causing fruit rot. Biocont. Sci. Technol. 25, 185– 206. 10.1080/09583157.2014.968092 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Batista N. N. Ramos C. L. Ribeiro D. D. Pinheiro A. C. M. Schwan R. F. (2015). Dynamic behavior of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia kluyveri and Hanseniaspora uvarum during spontaneous and inoculated cocoa fermentations and their effect on sensory characteristics of chocolate. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 63, 221– 227. 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.051 · DOI
  9. Beltran G. Torija M. J. Novo M. Ferrer N. Poblet M. Guillamón J. M.. (2002). Analysis of yeast populations during alcoholic fermentation: a six year follow-up study. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 25, 287– 293. 10.1078/0723-2020-00097 12353885 · DOI
  10. Bilbao A. Irastorza A. Dueñas M. Fernandez K. (1997). The effect of temperature on the growth of strains of Kloeckera apiculata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in apple juice fermentation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 24, 37– 39. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1997.00340.x 9024002 · DOI
  11. Bilinski C. A. Russell I. Stewart G. G. (1987). Applicability of yeast extracellular proteinases in brewing: physiological and biochemical aspects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53, 495– 499. 16347298 PMC203694
  12. Bruvo R. Michiels N. K. D'souza T. G. Schulenburg H. (2004). A simple method for the calculation of microsatellite genotype distances irrespective of ploidy level. Mol. Ecol. 13, 2101– 2106. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02209.x 15189230 · DOI
  13. Cabranes C. Mangas J. J. Blanco D. (1997). Selection and biochemical characterisation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kloeckera apiculata strains isolated from spanish cider. J. Inst. Brew. 103, 165– 169. 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1997.tb00945.x · DOI
  14. Cai Z. Yang R. Xiao H. Qin X. Si L. (2015). Effect of preharvest application of Hanseniaspora uvarum on postharvest diseases in strawberries. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 100, 52– 58. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.09.004 · DOI
  15. Capece A. Fiore C. Maraz A. Romano P. (2005). Molecular and technological approaches to evaluate strain biodiversity in Hanseniaspora uvarum of wine origin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 98, 136– 144. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02434.x 15610426 · DOI
  16. Capriotti A. (1955). Yeasts in some Netherlands soils. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 21, 145– 156. 10.1007/BF02543809 14388635 · DOI
  17. Caruso M. Capece A. Salzano G. Romano P. (2002). Typing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kloeckera apiculata strains from Aglianico wine. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 34, 323– 328. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01090.x 11967053 · DOI
  18. Charoenchai C. Fleet G. H. Henschke P. A. Todd B. E. N. T. (1997). Screening of non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts for the presence of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 3, 2– 8. 10.1111/j.1755-0238.1997.tb00109.x · DOI
  19. Ciani M. Beco L. Comitini F. (2006). Fermentation behaviour and metabolic interactions of multistarter wine yeast fermentations. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 108, 239– 245. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.11.012 16487611 · DOI
  20. Codon A. C. Gasentramirez J. M. Benitez T. (1995). Factors which affect the frequency of sporulation and tetrad formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae bakers yeasts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 1677– 1677. 16535013 PMC1388431
  21. Combina M. Elía A. Mercado L. Catania C. Ganga A. Martinez C. (2005). Dynamics of indigenous yeast populations during spontaneous fermentation of wines from Mendoza, Argentina. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 99, 237– 243. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.08.017 15808358 · DOI
  22. Comi G. Romano P. Cocolin L. Fiore C. (2001). Characterization of Kloeckera apiculata strains from the Friuli region in Northern Italy. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17, 391– 394. 10.1023/A:1016731420425 · DOI
  23. Comitini F. Ciani M. (2010). The zymocidial activity of Tetrapisispora phaffii in the control of Hanseniaspora uvarum during the early stages of winemaking. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 50, 50– 56. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02754.x 19874485 · DOI
  24. de Araujo F. V. Soares C. A. G. Hagler A. N. Mendonça-Hagler L. C. (1995). Ascomycetous yeast communities of marine invertebrates in a Southeast Brazilian mangrove ecosystem. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 68, 91– 99. 10.1007/BF00873096 8546456 · DOI
  25. de Arruda Moura Pietrowski G. Grochoski M. Sartori G. F. Gomes T. A. Wosiacki G. Nogueira A. (2015). Viability of Hanseniaspora uvarum yeast preserved by lyophilization and cryopreservation. Yeast 32, 559– 565. 10.1002/yea.3079 26095929 · DOI
  26. Emmanouil-Nikoloussi E. Kanellaki-Kyparissi M. Papavassiliou P. Koliakos K. Dermentzopoulou M. Foroglou C. (1994). “Hanseniaspora uvarum” the ultrastructural morphology of a rare ascomycete, isolated from oral thrush. Bull. Group. Int. Rech. Sci. Stomatol. Odontol. 37, 13– 17. 7994154
  27. Esteve-Zarzoso B. Belloch C. Uruburu F. Querol A. (1999). Identification of yeasts by RFLP analysis of the 5.8S rRNA gene and the two ribosomal internal transcribed spacers. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49, 329– 337. 10.1099/00207713-49-1-329 10028278 · DOI
  28. Esteve-Zarzoso B. Hierro N. Mas A. Guillamon J. M. (2010). A new simplified AFLP method for wine yeast strain typing. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 43, 1480– 1484. 10.1016/j.lwt.2010.05.016 · DOI
  29. Esteve-Zarzoso B. Peris-Torán M. Ramón D. Querol A. (2001). Molecular characterisation of Hanseniaspora species. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 80, 85– 92. 10.1023/A:1012268931569 11761370 · DOI
  30. Farías M. E. Manca de Nadra M. C. (2003). Flocculation and cell surface characterization of Kloeckera apiculata from wine. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95, 457– 462. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01994.x 12911692 · DOI
  31. Gao C. Fleet G. H. (1988). The effects of temperature and pH on the ethanol tolerance of the wine yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida stellata and Kloeckera apiculata. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 65, 405– 409. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb01909.x · DOI
  32. Garcia-Martos P. Hernandez-Molina J. M. Galan F. Ruiz-Henestrosa J. R. Garcia-Agudo R. J. P. M. Mira J. (1999). Isolation of Hanseniaspora uvarum (Kloeckera apiculata) in humans. Mycopathologia 144, 73– 75. 10.1023/A:1006900909455 10481287 · DOI
  33. Gaudeul M. Till-Bottraud I. Barjon F. Manel S. (2004). Genetic diversity and differentiation in Eryngium alpinum L. (Apiaceae): comparison of AFLP and microsatellite markers. Heredity 92, 508– 518. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800443 15014426 · DOI
  34. Ghosh S. (2015). Metagenomic Screening of Cell Wall Hydrolases, Their Anti-Fungal Activities and Potential Role in Wine Fermentation. Ph.D. thesis, Stellenbosch University.
  35. Granchi L. Bosco M. Messini A. Vincenzini M. (1999). Rapid detection and quantification of yeast species during spontaneous wine fermentation by PCR-RFLP analysis of the rDNA ITS region. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87, 949– 956. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00600.x 10692077 · DOI
  36. Grangeteau C. Gerhards D. Rousseaux S. von Wallbrunn C. Alexandre H. Guilloux-Benatier M. (2015). Diversity of yeast strains of the genus Hanseniaspora in the winery environment: what is their involvement in grape must fermentation? Food Microbiol. 50, 70– 77. 10.1016/j.fm.2015.03.009 25998817 · DOI
  37. Heard G. M. Fleet G. H. (1985). Growth of natural yeast flora during the fermentation of inoculated wines. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50, 727– 728. 16346894 PMC238702
  38. Heard G. M. Fleet G. H. (1988). The effects of temperature and pH on the growth of yeast species during the fermentation of grape juice. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 65, 23– 28. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb04312.x · DOI
  39. Hierro N. González Á. Mas A. Guillamón J. M. (2006). Diversity and evolution of non-Saccharomyces yeast populations during wine fermentation: effect of grape ripeness and cold maceration. FEMS Yeast Res. 6, 102– 111. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2005.00014.x 16423075 · DOI
  40. Hoffman C. S. (2001). Preparation of yeast DNA, in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, eds Ausubel F. M. Brent R. Kingston R. E. Moore D. D. Seidman J. G. Smith J. A. Struhl K. (John Wiley & Sons Inc), 13.11.11– 13.11.14.
  41. Holloway P. Subden R. E. Lachance M. A. (1990). The yeasts in a riesling must from the Niagara grape-growing region of Ontario. Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J. 23, 212– 216. 10.1016/S0315-5463(90)70245-3 · DOI
  42. Hong Y.-A. Park H.-D. (2013). Role of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Korean wines produced from Campbell early grapes: potential use of Hanseniaspora uvarum as a starter culture. Food Microbiol. 34, 207– 214. 10.1016/j.fm.2012.12.011 23498200 · DOI
  43. Jones C. J. Edwards K. J. Castaglione S. Winfield M. O. Sala F. van de Wiel C. (1997). Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol. Breed. 3, 381– 390. 10.1023/A:1009612517139 · DOI
  44. Kachalkin A. V. Abdullabekova D. A. Magomedova E. S. Magomedov G. G. Chernov I. Y. (2015). Yeasts of the vineyards in Dagestan and other regions. Microbiology 84, 425– 432. 10.1134/S002626171503008X 26263696 · DOI
  45. Kocan R. M. Hasenclever H. F. (1972). Normal yeast flora of the upper digestive tract of some wild columbids. J. Wildl. Dis. 8, 365– 368. 10.7589/0090-3558-8.4.365 4564184 · DOI
  46. Kosse D. Seiler H. Amann R. Ludwig W. Scherer S. (1997). Identification of Yoghurt-spoiling Yeasts with 18S rRNA-targeted Oligonucleotide Probes. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 20, 468– 480. 10.1016/S0723-2020(97)80016-1 · DOI
  47. Kurtzman C. P. Fell J. W. Boekhout T. (2011). The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  48. Kurtzman C. P. Robnett C. J. (1998). Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 73, 331– 371. 10.1023/A:1001761008817 9850420 · DOI
  49. Lachance M.-A. (1995). Yeast communities in a natural tequila fermentation. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 68, 151– 160. 10.1007/BF00873100 8546452 · DOI
  50. Lam S. S. Howell K. S. (2015). Drosophila-associated yeast species in vineyard ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Lett 362. 10.1093/femsle/fnv170 26391524 · DOI
  51. Legras J. L. Ruh O. Merdinoglu D. Karst F. (2005). Selection of hypervariable microsatellite loci for the characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 102, 73– 83. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.007 15925004 · DOI
  52. Li S.-S. Cheng C. Li Z. Chen J.-Y. Yan B. Han B.-Z.. (2010). Yeast species associated with wine grapes in China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 138, 85– 90. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.01.009 20116124 · DOI
  53. Liu H. Guo J. Cheng Y. Luo L. Liu P. Wang B. (2010a). Control of gray mold of grape by Hanseniaspora uvarum and its effects on postharvest quality parameters. Ann. Microbiol. 60, 31– 35. 10.1007/s13213-010-0018-3 · DOI
  54. Liu H. M. Guo J. H. Luo L. Liu P. Wang B. Q. Cheng Y. J. (2010b). Improvement of Hanseniaspora uvarum biocontrol activity against gray mold by the addition of ammonium molybdate and the possible mechanisms involved. Crop Prot. 29, 277– 282. 10.1016/j.cropro.2009.10.020 · DOI
  55. Liu P. Cheng Y. Yang M. Liu Y. Chen K. Long C. A.. (2014). Mechanisms of action for 2-phenylethanol isolated from Kloeckera apiculata in control of Penicillium molds of citrus fruits. BMC Microbiol. 14: 242. 10.1186/s12866-014-0242-2 25230758 PMC4177429 · DOI
  56. Long C.-A. Wu Z. Deng B.-X. (2005). Biological control of Penicillium italicum of Citrus and Botrytis cinerea of grape by strain 34–9 of Kloeckera apiculata. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 221, 197– 201. 10.1007/s00217-005-1199-z · DOI
  57. Manzanares P. Ramón D. Querol A. (1999). Screening of non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts for the production of β-D-xylosidase activity. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 46, 105– 112. 10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00186-X 10728611 · DOI
  58. Mariette S. Chagné D. Lézier C. Pastuszka P. Raffin A. Plomion C.. (2001). Genetic diversity within and among Pinus pinaster populations: comparison between AFLP and microsatellite markers. Heredity 86, 469– 479. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00852.x 11520347 · DOI
  59. Masneuf-Pomarede I. Juquin E. Miot-Sertier C. Renault P. Laizet Y. H. Salin F.. (2015). The yeast Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina) shows high genetic diversity in winemaking environments. FEMS Yeast Res. 15: fov045. 10.1093/femsyr/fov045 26071435 · DOI
  60. Masoud W. Bjørg Cesar L. Jespersen L. Jakobsen M. (2004). Yeast involved in fermentation of Coffea arabica in East Africa determined by genotyping and by direct denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis. Yeast 21, 549– 556. 10.1002/yea.1124 15164358 · DOI
  61. Mateo J. J. Jimenez M. Huerta T. Pastor A. (1991). Contribution of different yeasts isolated from musts of monastrell grapes to the aroma of wine. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 14, 153– 160. 10.1016/0168-1605(91)90102-U 1777384 · DOI
  62. Mehlomakulu N. N. Setati M. E. Divol B. (2014). Characterization of novel killer toxins secreted by wine-related non-Saccharomyces yeasts and their action on Brettanomyces spp. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 188, 83– 91. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.07.015 25087208 · DOI
  63. Mendoza L. M. Manca de Nadra M. C. Farías M. E. (2007). Kinetics and metabolic behavior of a composite culture of Kloeckera apiculata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine related strains. Biotechnol. Lett. 29, 1057– 1063. 10.1007/s10529-007-9355-0 17440687 · DOI
  64. Mendoza L. Nadra M. M. Bru E. Farías M. (2009). Influence of wine-related physicochemical factors on the growth and metabolism of non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces yeasts in mixed culture. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 36, 229– 237. 10.1007/s10295-008-0489-4 18953586 · DOI
  65. Merritt A. E. Hurley R. (1972). Evaluation of sporulation media for yeasts obtained from pathological material. J. Med. Microbiol. 5, 21– 30. 10.1099/00222615-5-1-21 4553908 · DOI
  66. Mocke B. A. (2005). The Breeding of Yeast Strains for Novel Oenological Outcomes. Ph.D. thesis, Stellenbosch University.
  67. Morais P. B. Martins M. B. Klaczko L. B. Mendonça-Hagler L. C. Hagler A. N. (1995). Yeast succession in the Amazon fruit Parahancornia amapa as resource partitioning among Drosophila spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 4251– 4257. 8534092 PMC167736
  68. Morais P. B. Rosa C. A. Linardi V. R. Pataro C. Maia A. B. R. A. (1997). Short communication: characterization and succession of yeast populations associated with spontaneous fermentations during the production of Brazilian sugar-cane aguardente. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 13, 241– 243. 10.1023/A:1018558302062 · DOI
  69. Moreira N. Mendes F. Guedes de Pinho P. Hogg T. Vasconcelos I. (2008). Heavy sulphur compounds, higher alcohols and esters production profile of Hanseniaspora uvarum and Hanseniaspora guilliermondii grown as pure and mixed cultures in grape must. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 124, 231– 238. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.025 18457893 · DOI
  70. Moreira N. Pina C. Mendes F. Couto J. A. Hogg T. Vasconcelos I. (2011). Volatile compounds contribution of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii and Hanseniaspora uvarum during red wine vinifications. Food Cont. 22, 662– 667. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.07.025 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Nguyen N. H. Suh S. O. Blackwell M. (2007). Five novel Candida species in insect-associated yeast clades isolated from Neuroptera and other insects. Mycologia 99, 842– 858. 10.3852/mycologia.99.6.842 18333508 · DOI
  72. Owuama C. I. Saunders J. R. (1990). Physiological variants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kloeckera apiculata from palm wine and cashew juice. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 68, 491– 494. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb02901.x 2196256 · DOI
  73. Pagnocca F. G. Mendonca-Hagler L. C. Hagler A. N. (1989). Yeasts associated with the white shrimp Penaeus schmitti, sediment, and water of Sepetiba Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Yeast 5 Spec No, S479– S483. 2750315
  74. Pando Bedrinana R. Lastra Queipo A. Suarez Valles B. (2012). Screening of enymatic activities in non-Saccharomyces cider yeasts. J. Food Biochem. 36, 683– 689. 10.1111/j.1745-4514.2011.00583.x · DOI
  75. Paradis E. (2010). Pegas: an R package for population genetics with an integrated-modular approach. Bioinformatics 26, 419– 420. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp696 20080509 · DOI
  76. Parker P. G. Snow A. A. Schug M. D. Booton G. C. Fuerst P. A. (1998). What molecules can tell us about populations: choosing and using a molecular marker. Ecology 79, 361– 382. 10.2307/176939 · DOI
  77. Pu L. Jingfan F. Kai C. Chao-an L. Yunjiang C. (2014). Phenylethanol promotes adhesion and biofilm formation of the antagonistic yeast Kloeckera apiculata for the control of blue mold on citrus. FEMS Yeast Res. 14, 536– 546. 10.1111/1567-1364.12139 24479773 · DOI
  78. Radler F. Pfeiffer P. Dennert M. (1985). Killer toxins in new isolates of the yeasts Hanseniaspora uvarum and Pichia kluyveri. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 29, 269– 272. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1985.tb00874.x · DOI
  79. Radler F. Schmitt M. J. Meyer B. (1990). Killer toxin of Hanseniaspora uvarum. Arch. Microbiol. 154, 175– 178. 10.1007/BF00423329 2206104 · DOI
  80. Redzepovic S. Orlic S. Majdak A. Kozina B. Volschenk H. Viljoen-Bloom M. (2003). Differential malic acid degradation by selected strains of Saccharomyces during alcoholic fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 83, 49– 61. 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00320-3 12672592 · DOI
  81. Reid V. J. Theron L. W. du Toit M. Divol B. (2012). Identification and partial characterization of extracellular aspartic protease genes from Metschnikowia pulcherrima IWBT Y1123 and Candida apicola IWBT Y1384. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 6838– 6849. 10.1128/AEM.00505-12 22820332 PMC3457490 · DOI
  82. Renard A. Gómez di Marco P. Egea-Cortines M. Weiss J. (2008). Application of whole genome amplification and quantitative PCR for detection and quantification of spoilage yeasts in orange juice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 126, 195– 201. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.05.021 18597878 · DOI
  83. Romano P. Palla G. Caligiani A. Brandolini V. Maietti A. Salzano G. (2000). Evaluation of stereoisomers of 2,3-butanediol and acetoin to differentiate Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kloeckera apiculata wine strains. Biotechnol. Lett. 22, 1947– 1951. 10.1023/A:1026741625019 · DOI
  84. Romano P. Suzzi G. Zironi R. Comi G. (1993). Biometric study of acetoin production in Hanseniaspora guilliermondii and Kloeckera apiculata. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 1838– 1841. 16348961 PMC182169
  85. Ross K. G. Shoemaker D. D. Krieger M. J. DeHeer C. J. Keller L. (1999). Assessing genetic structure with multiple classes of molecular markers: a case study involving the introduced fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 525– 543. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026134 10331278 · DOI
  86. Schmitt M. J. Neuhausen F. (1994). Killer toxin-secreting double-stranded RNA mycoviruses in the yeasts Hanseniaspora uvarum and Zygosaccharomyces bailii. J. Virol. 68, 1765– 1772. 8107238 PMC236637
  87. Schuelke M. (2000). An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 233– 234. 10.1038/72708 10657137 · DOI
  88. Schütz M. Gafner J. (1993). Analysis of yeast diversity during spontaneous and induced alcoholic fermentations. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 75, 551– 558. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb01594.x · DOI
  89. Shimodaira H. (2002). An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51, 492– 508. 10.1080/10635150290069913 12079646 · DOI · Paper page
  90. Sláviková E. Vadkertiová R. Vránová D. (2009). Yeasts colonizing the leaves of fruit trees. Ann. Microbiol. 59, 419– 424. 10.1007/BF03175125 · DOI
  91. Sosa O. de Nadra M. M. Farías M. (2008). Modification by glucose of the flocculent phenotype of a Kloeckera apiculata wine strain. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35, 851– 857. 10.1007/s10295-008-0357-2 18425542 · DOI
  92. Spencer D. M. Spencer J. F. T. De Figueroa L. Heluane H. (1992). Yeasts associated with rotting citrus fruits in Tucumán, Argentina. Mycol. Res. 96, 891– 892. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)81038-1 · DOI
  93. Strauss M. L. Jolly N. P. Lambrechts M. G. van Rensburg P. (2001). Screening for the production of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes by non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91, 182– 190. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01379.x 11442729 · DOI
  94. Suzuki R. Shimodaira H. (2006). Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 22, 1540– 1542. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl117 16595560 · DOI
  95. Suzzi G. Schirone M. Sergi M. Marianella R. M. Fasoli G. Aguzzi I.. (2012). Multistarter from organic viticulture for red wine Montepulciano d'Abruzzo production. Front. Microbiol. 3: 135. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00135 22529841 PMC3328976 · DOI
  96. Valles B. S. Bedriñana R. P. Tascón N. F. Simón A. Q. Madrera R. R. (2007). Yeast species associated with the spontaneous fermentation of cider. Food Microbiol. 24, 25– 31. 10.1016/j.fm.2006.04.001 16943091 · DOI
  97. van Wyk H. Divol B. (2010). Recovery of endo-polygalacturonase activity in wine yeast and its effect on wine aroma. FEMS Yeast Res. 10, 58– 71. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00588.x 19840119 · DOI
  98. Velázquez J. B. Longo E. Sieiro C. Cansado J. Calo P. Villa T. G. (1991). Improvement of the alcoholic fermentation of grape juice with mixed cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wild strains. Negative effect of Kloeckera apiculata. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 7, 485– 489. 10.1007/BF00303374 24425134 · DOI
  99. Versavaud A. Hallet J.-N. (1995). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis combined with rare-cutting endonucleases for strain differentiation of Candida famata, Kloeckera apiculata and Schizosaccharomyces pombe with dhromosome number and size estimation of the two former. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 18, 303– 309. 10.1016/S0723-2020(11)80401-7 · DOI
  100. Wang C. Esteve-Zarzoso B. Mas A. (2014). Monitoring of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hanseniaspora uvarum, and Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina) populations during alcoholic fermentation by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 191, 1– 9. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.08.014 25218463 · DOI
  101. Wang C. Mas A. Esteve-Zarzoso B. (2015). Interaction between Hanseniaspora uvarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during alcoholic fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 206, 67– 74. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.04.022 25956738 · DOI
  102. Weiss S. Samson F. Navarro D. Casaregola S. (2013). YeastIP: a database for identification and phylogeny of Saccharomycotina yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res 13, 117– 125. 10.1111/1567-1364.12017 23110448 · DOI
  103. White T. J. Bruns T. D. Lee S. B. Taylor J. W. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, eds Innis M. A. Gelfand D. H. Sninsky J. J. White T. J. (London: Academic Press), 315– 322.
  104. Wiles A. E. (1950). Studies of some yeasts causing spoilage of draught beers. J. Inst. Brew. 56, 183– 193. 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1950.tb01531.x · DOI
  105. Zagorc T. Maráz A. Cadez N. Jemec K. P. Péter G. Resnik M. (2001). Indigenous wine killer yeasts and their application as a starter culture in wine fermentation. Food Microbiol. 18, 441– 451. 10.1006/fmic.2001.0422 · DOI
  106. Zironi R. Romano P. Suzzi G. Battistutta F. Comi G. (1993). Volatile metabolites produced in wine by mixed and sequential cultures of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii or Kloeckera apiculata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Lett. 15, 235– 238. 10.1007/BF0012831117440687 · DOI
  107. Zohre D. E. Erten H. (2002). The influence of Kloeckera apiculata and Candida pulcherrima yeasts on wine fermentation. Proc. Biochem. 38, 319– 324. 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00086-9 · DOI
  108. Zott K. Claisse O. Lucas P. Coulon J. Lonvaud-Funel A. Masneuf-Pomarede I. (2010). Characterization of the yeast ecosystem in grape must and wine using real-time PCR. Food Microbiol. 27, 559– 567. 10.1016/j.fm.2010.01.006 20510771 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albertin, W., Setati, M. E., Miot-Sertier, C., Mostert, T. T., Colonna-Ceccaldi, B., Coulon, J., Girard, P., Moine, V., Pillet, M., Salin, F., Bely, M., Divol, B., & Masneuf-Pomarede, I.
Affiliations
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • Pernod Ricard (France) (FR)
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
Corresponding author
Albertin, Warren
ORCID
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2016-01-20
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
1569-1569
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fmicb.2015.01569
PMC
PMC4718985
OpenAlex
W2224638443
Cited by
124
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5
FWCI
14.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Horticultural and Viticultural Research
Keywords
Hanseniaspora uvarum, genetic diversity, microsatellite markers, AFLP, extracellular enzymes, pectinase, chitinase, proteolytic enzymes, β-glucosidase, grape must, Saccharomyces, strain differentiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review