The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intestinal Microbiota of Broiler Chickens As Affected by Litter Management Regimens
Open accessAbstract
Poultry litter is a mixture of bedding materials and enteric bacteria excreted by chickens, and it is typically reused for multiple growth cycles in commercial broiler production. Thus, bacteria can be transmitted from one growth cycle to the next via litter. However, it remains poorly understood how litter reuse affects development and composition of chicken gut microbiota. In this study, the effect of litter reuse on the microbiota in litter and in chicken gut was investigated using 2 litter management regimens: fresh vs. reused litter. Samples of ileal mucosa and cecal digesta were collected from young chicks (10 days of age) and mature birds (35 days of age). Based on analysis using DGGE and pyrosequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicons, the microbiota of both the ileal mucosa and the cecal contents was affected by both litter management regimen and age of birds. Faecalibacterium, Oscillospira, Butyricicoccus, and one unclassified candidate genus closely related to Ruminococcus were most predominant in the cecal samples, while Lactobacillus was predominant in the ileal samples at both ages and in the cecal samples collected at day 10. At days 10 and 35, 8 and 3 genera, respectively, in the cecal luminal microbiota differed significantly in relative abundance between the 2 litter management regimens. Compared to the fresh litter, reused litter increased predominance of halotolerant/alkaliphilic bacteria and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a butyrate-producing gut bacterium. This study suggests that litter management regimens affect the chicken GI microbiota, which may impact the host nutritional status and intestinal health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intestinal microbiota associated with differential feed conversion efficiency in chickens
Stanley, D., Denman, S. E., Hughes, R. J., Geier, M. S., Crowley, T. M., Chen, H., Haring, V. R., & Moore, R. J. (2012) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3847-5 · Cited by 312
Cited by
Microbiota, Gut Health and Chicken Productivity: What Is the Connection?
Diaz Carrasco, J. M., Casanova, N. A., & Fernández Miyakawa, M. E. (2019) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms7100374 · Cited by 448
Peng, B.-Y., Su, Y., Chen, Z., Chen, J., Zhou, X., Benbow, M. E., Criddle, C. S., Wu, W.-M., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b06963 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L., Lilburn, M., & Yu, Z.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-05-18
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 593-593
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2401222577
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intestinal Microbiota of Broiler Chickens As Affected by Litter Management Regimens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00593
- The paper
- Wang, L., Lilburn, M., & Yu, Z. (2016). Intestinal Microbiota of Broiler Chickens As Affected by Litter Management Regimens. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.