The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conductive Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Accelerate Syntrophic Methane Production from Butyrate Oxidation in Two Different Lake Sediments
Open accessAbstract
Syntrophic methanogenesis is an essential link in the global carbon cycle and a key bioprocess for the disposal of organic waste and production of biogas. Recent studies suggest direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) is involved in electron exchange in methanogenesis occurring in paddy soils, anaerobic digesters, and specific co-cultures with Geobacter. In this study, we evaluate the possible involvement of DIET in the syntrophic oxidation of butyrate in the enrichments from two lake sediments (an urban lake and a natural lake). The results showed that the production of CH4 was significantly accelerated in the presence of conductive nanoscale Fe3O4 or carbon nanotubes in the sediment enrichments. Observations made with fluorescence in situ hybridization and scanning electron microscope indicated that microbial aggregates were formed in the enrichments. It appeared that the average cell-to-cell distance in aggregates in nanomaterial-amended enrichments was larger than that in aggregates in the non-amended control. These results suggested that DIET-mediated syntrophic methanogenesis could occur in the lake sediments in the presence of conductive materials. Microbial community analysis of the enrichments revealed that the genera of Syntrophomonas, Sulfurospirillum, Methanosarcina, and Methanoregula were responsible for syntrophic oxidation of butyrate in lake sediment samples. The mechanism for the conductive-material-facilitated DIET in butyrate syntrophy deserves further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electron transfer in syntrophic communities of anaerobic bacteria and archaea
Stams, A. J. M., & Plugge, C. M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2166 · Cited by 1,441
Promoting direct interspecies electron transfer with activated carbon
Liu, F., Rotaru, A.-E., Shrestha, P. M., Malvankar, N. S., Nevin, K. P., & Lovley, D. R. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee22459c · Cited by 879
Promoting Interspecies Electron Transfer with Biochar
Chen, S., Rotaru, A.-E., Shrestha, P. M., Malvankar, N. S., Liu, F., Fan, W., Nevin, K. P., & Lovley, D. R. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep05019 · Cited by 727
Cited by
Park, J.-H., Kang, H.-J., Park, K.-H., & Park, H.-D. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.095 · Cited by 452
Methane Production and Conductive Materials: A Critical Review
Martins, G., Salvador, A. F., Pereira, L., & Alves, M. M. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b01913 · Cited by 432
Kumar, V., Nabaterega, R., Khoei, S., & Eskicioglu, C. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110965 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J., & Lu, Y.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-08-22
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 1316-1316
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2518205498
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conductive Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Accelerate Syntrophic Methane Production from Butyrate Oxidation in Two Different Lake Sediments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01316
- The paper
- Zhang, J., & Lu, Y. (2016). Conductive Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Accelerate Syntrophic Methane Production from Butyrate Oxidation in Two Different Lake Sediments. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.