The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lactobacilli Dominance and Vaginal pH: Why Is the Human Vaginal Microbiome Unique?
Open accessAbstract
The human vaginal microbiome is dominated by bacteria from the genus Lactobacillus, which create an acidic environment thought to protect women against sexually transmitted pathogens and opportunistic infections. Strikingly, lactobacilli dominance appears to be unique to humans; while the relative abundance of lactobacilli in the human vagina is typically >70%, in other mammals lactobacilli rarely comprise more than 1% of vaginal microbiota. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain humans' unique vaginal microbiota, including humans' distinct reproductive physiology, high risk of STDs, and high risk of microbial complications linked to pregnancy and birth. Here, we test these hypotheses using comparative data on vaginal pH and the relative abundance of lactobacilli in 26 mammalian species and 50 studies (N=21 mammals for pH and 14 mammals for lactobacilli abundance). We found that non-human mammals, like humans, exhibit the lowest vaginal pH during the period of highest estrogen. However, the vaginal pH of non-human mammals is never as low as is typical for humans (median vaginal pH in humans = 4.5; range of pH across all 21 non-human mammals = 5.4 to 7.8). Contrary to disease and obstetric risk hypotheses, we found no significant relationship between vaginal pH or lactobacilli abundance and multiple metrics of STD or birth injury risk (P-values ranged from 0.13 to 0.99). Given the lack of evidence for these hypotheses, we discuss two alternative explanations: the common function hypothesis and a novel hypothesis related to the diet of agricultural humans. Specifically, with regard to diet we propose that high levels of starch in human diets have led to increased levels of glycogen in the vaginal tract, which, in turn, promotes the proliferation of lactobacilli. If true, human diet may have paved the way for a novel, protective microbiome in human vaginal tracts. Overall, our results highlight the need for continuing research on non-human vaginal microbial communities and the importance of investigating both the physiological mechanisms and the broad evolutionary processes underlying human lactobacilli dominance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Modern Applied Statistics with S
Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 · Cited by 24,305
APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language
Paradis, E., Claude, J., & Strimmer, K. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · Cited by 11,335
Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women
Ravel, J., Gajer, P., Abdo, Z., Schneider, G. M., Koenig, S. S. K., McCulle, S. L., Karlebach, S., Gorle, R., Russell, J., Tacket, C. O., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002611107 · Cited by 4,254
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 3,809
Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes
Ley, R. E., Hamady, M., Lozupone, C., Turnbaugh, P. J., Ramey, R. R., Bircher, J. S., Schlegel, M. L., Tucker, T. A., Schrenzel, M. D., Knight, R., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155725 · Cited by 3,747
Cellular Scaling Rules for the Brains of Marsupials: Not as “Primitive” as Expected
Dos Santos, S. E., Porfirio, J., da Cunha, F. B., Manger, P. R., Tavares, W., Pessoa, L., Raghanti, M. A., Sherwood, C. C., & Herculano-Houzel, S. (2017) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000452856 · Cited by 2,642
The delayed rise of present-day mammals
Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Cardillo, M., Jones, K. E., MacPhee, R. D. E., Beck, R. M. D., Grenyer, R., Price, S. A., Vos, R. A., Gittleman, J. L., & Purvis, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05634 · Cited by 2,082
Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication
Diamond, J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01019 · Cited by 1,776
Worlds within worlds: evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota
Ley, R. E., Lozupone, C. A., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Gordon, J. I. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1978 · Cited by 1,665
Cited by
The Vaginal Microenvironment: The Physiologic Role of Lactobacilli
Amabebe, E., & Anumba, D. O. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00181 · Cited by 785
Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Current Understanding and Burning Questions
Willems, H. M. E., Ahmed, S. S., Liu, J., Xu, Z., & Peters, B. M. (2020) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof6010027 · Cited by 357
Problems with the concept of gut microbiota dysbiosis
Brüssow, H. (2020) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13479 · Cited by 250
George, F., Daniel, C., Thomas, M., Singer, E., Guilbaud, A., Tessier, F. J., Revol-Junelles, A.-M., Borges, F., & Foligné, B. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02899 · Cited by 198
A citizen-science-enabled catalogue of the vaginal microbiome and associated factors
Lebeer, S., Ahannach, S., Gehrmann, T., Wittouck, S., Eilers, T., Oerlemans, E., Condori, S., Dillen, J., Spacova, I., Vander Donck, L., et al. (2023) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-023-01500-0 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, E. A., Beasley, D. E., Dunn, R. R., & Archie, E. A.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-12-08
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 1936-1936
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2551329978
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 20.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lactobacilli Dominance and Vaginal pH: Why Is the Human Vaginal Microbiome Unique? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01936
- The paper
- Miller, E. A., Beasley, D. E., Dunn, R. R., & Archie, E. A. (2016). Lactobacilli Dominance and Vaginal pH: Why Is the Human Vaginal Microbiome Unique? Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01936
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.