The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dual Induction of New Microbial Secondary Metabolites by Fungal Bacterial Co-cultivation
Open accessAbstract
The frequent re-isolation of known compounds is one of the major challenges in drug discovery. Many biosynthetic genes are not expressed under standard culture conditions, thus limiting the chemical diversity of microbial compounds that can be obtained through fermentation. On the other hand, the competition during co-cultivation of two or more different microorganisms in most cases leads to an enhanced production of constitutively present compounds or an accumulation of cryptic compounds that are not detected in axenic cultures of the producing strain under different fermentation conditions. Herein, we report the dual induction of newly detected bacterial and fungal metabolites by the co-cultivation of the marine-derived fungal isolate Aspergillus fumigatus MR2012 and two hyper-arid desert bacterial isolates Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii strain C34 and strain C58. Co-cultivation of the fungal isolate MR2012 with the bacterial strain C34 led to the production of luteoride D, a new luteoride derivative and pseurotin G, a new pseurotin derivative in addition to the production of terezine D and 11-O-methylpseurotin A which were not traced before from this fungal strain under different fermentation conditions. In addition to the previously detected metabolites in strain C34, the lasso peptide chaxapeptin was isolated under co-culture conditions. The gene cluster for the latter compound had been identified through genome scanning, but it had never been detected before in the axenic culture of strain C34. Furthermore, when the fungus MR2012 was co-cultivated with the bacterial strain C58, the main producer of chaxapeptin, the titre of this metabolite was doubled, while additionally the bacterial metabolite pentalenic acid was detected and isolated for the first time from this strain, whereas the major fungal metabolites that were produced under axenic culture were suppressed. Finally, fermentation of the MR2012 by itself led to the isolation of the new diketopiperazine metabolite named brevianamide X.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carroll, A. R., Copp, B. R., Davis, R. A., Keyzers, R. A., & Prinsep, M. R. (2019) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/c8np00092a · Cited by 518
A Co-Culturing Approach Enables Discovery and Biosynthesis of a Bioactive Indole Alkaloid Metabolite
Maglangit, F., Fang, Q., Kyeremeh, K., Sternberg, J. M., Ebel, R., & Deng, H. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25020256 · Cited by 47
Self-citationMohamed, H., Awad, M. F., Shah, A. M., Sadaqat, B., Nazir, Y., Naz, T., Yang, W., & Song, Y. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17442-2 · Cited by 21
Maleckis, M., Wibowo, M., Williams, S. E., Gotfredsen, C. H., Sigrist, R., Souza, L. D. O., Cowled, M. S., Charusanti, P., Gren, T., Saha, S., et al. (2024) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.4c00121 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Wakefield, J., Hassan, H. M., Jaspars, M., Ebel, R., & Rateb, M. E.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-07-11
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 1284-1284
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2735752608
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dual Induction of New Microbial Secondary Metabolites by Fungal Bacterial Co-cultivation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01284
- The paper
- Wakefield, J., Hassan, H. M., Jaspars, M., Ebel, R., & Rateb, M. E. (2017). Dual Induction of New Microbial Secondary Metabolites by Fungal Bacterial Co-cultivation. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01284
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.