Cited by 28Microbial Community Ecology and PhysiologyGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena

Community structure of lithotrophically-driven hydrothermal microbial mats from the Mariana Arc and back-arc.

Open access
Hager, Kevin W., Fullerton, Heather, Butterfield, David A., Moyer, Craig L.·2017·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

The Mariana region exhibits a rich array of hydrothermal venting conditions in a complex geological setting, which provides a natural laboratory to study the influence of local environmental conditions on microbial community structure as well as large-scale patterns in microbial biogeography. We used high-throughput amplicon sequencing of the bacterial small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene from 22 microbial mats collected from four hydrothermally active locations along the Mariana Arc and back-arc to explore the structure of lithotrophically-based microbial mat communities. The vent effluent was classified as iron- or sulfur-rich corresponding with two distinct community types, dominated by either Zetaproteobacteria or Epsilonproteobacteria, respectively. The Zetaproteobacterial-based communities had the highest richness and diversity, which supports the hypothesis that Zetaproteobacteria function as ecosystem engineers creating a physical habitat within a chemical environment promoting enhanced microbial diversity. Gammaproteobacteria were also high in abundance within the iron-dominated mats and some likely contribute to primary production. In addition, we also compare sampling scale, showing that bulk sampling of microbial mats yields higher diversity than micro-scale sampling. We present a comprehensive analysis and offer new insights into the community structure and diversity of lithotrophically-driven microbial mats from a hydrothermal region associated with high microbial biodiversity. Our study indicates an important functional role of for the Zetaproteobacteria altering the mat habitat and enhancing community interactions and complexity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01578

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zetaproteobacteria-dominated mats showed significantly higher diversity, both in terms of OTU numbers and evenness, than other bacterial mats.

    “For example, Zetaproteobacteria-dominated mats showed significantly higher diversity, both in terms of OTU numbers and evenness, than other bacterial mats (Hager et al., 2017).”

    From Is It First the Egg or the Shrimp? – Diversity and Variation in Microbial Communities Colonizing Broods of the Vent Shrimp Rimicaris exoculata During Embryonic Development (2019) · cites this paper as Hager et al., 2017

    The Discussion (Zetaproteobacteria; page unavailable) says all Zetaproteobacteria-dominated mats had higher microbial diversity than the Epsilonproteobacteria-dominated mats. Table 3 (Results, Diversity estimates; page unavailable) reports observed OTUs and Shannon evenness, but the paper does not establish that the differences in both measures were statistically significant. The comparison is also with the Epsilonproteobacteria-dominated mats studied, not bacterial mats generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 28

Authors
Hager, K. W., Fullerton, H., Butterfield, D. A., & Moyer, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Western Washington University (US)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Moyer, Craig L.
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2017-08-28
Volume
8
Pages
1578-1578
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2748345681
Cited by
28
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (NA10OAR4320148)
  • National Science Foundation (OCE 1155756)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Keywords
lithotrophic bacteria, microbial community structure, microbial biogeography, Zetaproteobacteria, Epsilonproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, microbial diversity, Mariana arc, ecosystem engineers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review