Cited by 164Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityPlant Disease Management TechniquesMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

Comparative microbiome analysis of a Fusarium wilt suppressive soil and a Fusarium wilt conducive soil from the Châteaurenard region

Open access
Siegel-Hertz, Katarzyna, Edel-Hermann, Véronique, Chapelle, Emilie, Terrat, Sébastien, Raaijmakers, Jos M., Steinberg, Christian·2018·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

. Overall, this study supports the potential role of known fungal and bacterial genera in Fusarium wilt suppressive soils from Châteaurenard and pinpoints new bacterial and fungal genera for their putative role in Fusarium wilt suppressiveness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00568

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Saprotrophic fungi can contribute to the suppression of root-infecting fungal pathogens.

    “Moreover, saprotrophic fungi can contribute to the suppression of root-infecting fungal pathogens (van Beneden et al., 2010;Xiong et al., 2017;Siegel-Hertz et al., 2018).”

    From The hidden potential of saprotrophic fungi in arable soil: Patterns of short-term stimulation by organic amendments (2020) · cites this paper as Siegel-Hertz et al., 2018

    The Results and Discussion (page not provided) identify fungal genera with biocontrol activity against pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum and discuss their possible contribution to suppression. Our copy does not identify those fungi as saprotrophic, so it supports the suppression point but not that specific characterization. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

13 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Altschul S. F. Madden T. L. Schäffer A. A. Zhang J. Zhang Z. Miller W.. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389– 3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 9254694 PMC146917 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Edgar R. C. (2010). Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460– 2461. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 20709691 · DOI
  3. Mazzola M. (2007). Manipulation of rhizosphere bacterial communities to induce suppressive soil. J. Nematol. 39, 213– 220. 19259490 PMC2586500
  4. Soytong K. Kanokmedhakul S. Kukongviriyapa V. Isobe M. (2001). Application of Chaetomium species (Ketomium®) as a new broad spectrum biological fungicide for plant disease control: a review article. Fungal Divers. 7, 1– 15.
  5. Williams R. J. Howe A. Hofmockel K. S. (2014). Demonstrating microbial co-occurrence pattern analyses within and between ecosystems. Front. Microbiol. 5: 358. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00358 25101065 PMC4102878 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siegel-Hertz, K., Edel-Hermann, V., Chapelle, E., Terrat, S., Raaijmakers, J. M., & Steinberg, C.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NL)
Corresponding author
Steinberg, Christian
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2018-04-04
Volume
9
Pages
568-568
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2796403973
Cited by
164
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Management Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
Fusarium wilt, soil suppressiveness, soil microbiome, plant disease suppression, soil bacteria, soil fungi, new fungal genus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review