Cited by 41Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesAsthma and respiratory diseases

Evaluation of Galactomannan Testing, the Aspergillus-Specific Lateral-Flow Device Test and Levels of Cytokines in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid for Diagnosis of Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis

Open access
Salzer, Helmut J. F., Prattes, Juergen, Flick, Holger, Reimann, Maja, Heyckendorf, Jan, Kalsdorf, Barbara, Obersteiner, Sabrina, Gaede, Karoline I. +4 more·2018·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is challenging. Symptoms are unspecific or missing, radiological findings are variable and proof of mycological evidence is limited by the accuracy of diagnostic tests. The goal of this study was to investigate diagnostic performance of galactomannan (GM), the newly formatted Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow-device test (LFD), and a number of cytokines in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples obtained from patients with CPA, patients with respiratory disorders without CPA and healthy individuals. Methods: Patients with CPA (n=27) and controls (n=27 with underlying respiratory diseases but without CPA, and n=27 healthy volunteers) were recruited at the Medical University of Graz, Austria and the Research Center Borstel, Germany between 2010 and 2018. GM, LFD and cytokine testing was performed retrospectively at the Research Center Borstel. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of GM testing from BALF with a cut off level of ≥0.5 optical density index (ODI) was 41% and 100% and 30% and 100% with a cut off level of ≥1.0 ODI. ROC curve analysis showed an AUC 0.718 (95% CI 0.581 – 0.855) for GM for differentiating CPA patients to patients with other respiratory diseases without CPA. The LFD resulted positive in only 3 patients with CPA (7%) and was highly specific. CPA patients did not differ significantly in the BALF cytokine profile compared to patients with respiratory disorders without CPA, but showed significant higher values for IFN-γ, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α compared to healthy individuals. Conclusion: Both GM and LFD showed insufficient performance for diagnosing CPA, with sensitivities of BALF GM below 50%, and sensitivity of the LFD below 10%. The high specificities may however result in a high positive predictive value and thereby help to identify semi-invasive or invasive disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02223

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies showed that BAL fluid GM has improved sensitivity compared to serum GM in high-risk patients with IPA, including nonneutropenic patients.

    “Recent studies showed that BAL fluid GM has improved sensitivity compared to serum GM in high-risk patients with IPA, including nonneutropenic patients (88, 114–119).”

    From Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019 (2019) · cites this paper as [117]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 41

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Haussinger K. Ballin A. Becker H. D. Bolcskei P. Dierkesmann R. Dittrich I. (2004). Recommendations for quality standards in bronchoscopy. Pneumologie 58 344– 356. 15162262

Authors
Salzer, H. J. F., Prattes, J., Flick, H., Reimann, M., Heyckendorf, J., Kalsdorf, B., Obersteiner, S., Gaede, K. I., Herzmann, C., Johnson, G. L., Lange, C., & Hoenigl, M.
Affiliations
  • German Center for Infection Research (DE)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Salzer, Helmut J. F.
  • Prattes, Juergen
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2018-10-02
Volume
9
Pages
2223-2223
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894767974
Cited by
41
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, galactomannan, lateral flow devices, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, cytokines, sensitivity and specificity, interferon-gamma, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, TNF-α, IL-1β, invasive aspergillosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review