Shotgun Metagenomics of a Water Kefir Fermentation Ecosystem Reveals a Novel Oenococcus Species
Open accessAbstract
Water kefir is a fruity, sour, slightly alcoholic and carbonated beverage, which is made by fermentation of an aqueous sucrose solution in the presence of dried figs and water kefir grains. These polysaccharide grains contain lactic acid bacteria (LAB), yeasts, and sometimes bifidobacteria and/or acetic acid bacteria, which consume sucrose to produce exopolysaccharides, lactic acid, acetic acid, ethanol, and carbon dioxide. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was used to examine the microbial species diversity present at two time points during water kefir fermentation in detail, both in the water kefir liquor and on the water kefir grains, hence representing four samples. Lactobacillus harbinensis, L. hilgardii, L. nagelii, L. paracasei, and a Lactobacillus species similar to L. hordei/mali were present in the water kefir examined, along with Bifidobacterium aquikefiri and two yeast species, namely Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Dekkera bruxellensis. In addition, evidence for a novel Oenococcus species related to O. oeni and O. kitaharae was found. Its genome was derived from the metagenome and made available under the name of Candidatus Oenococcus aquikefiri. Through functional analysis of the four metagenomic data sets, it was possible to link the production of lactic acid, acetic acid, ethanol, and carbon dioxide to subgroups of the microbial species found. In particular, the production of mannitol from fructose was linked to L. hilgardii, Candidatus O. aquikefiri, and B. aquikefiri, whereas glycerol production was associated with S. cerevisiae. Also, there were indications of cross-feeding, for instance in the case of amino acid supply. Few bacterial species could synthesize a limited number of cofactors, making them reliant on the figs or S. cerevisiae. The LAB species in turn were found to be capable of contributing to water kefir grain growth, as dextransucrase-encoding genes were attributed to L. hilgardii, L. hordei/mali, and Candidatus O. aquikefiri.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Metagenomic studies have been mainly conducted on single food types and on limited sample sizes, hindering inter-study integrative analyses currently available only for other environments such as the human gut.
“Nevertheless, metagenomic studies have been mainly conducted on single food types 18-24 and on limited sample sizes, 25,26 hindering inter-study integrative analyses currently available only for other environments such as the human gut. 27-31”
From Unexplored microbial diversity from 2,500 food metagenomes and links with the human microbiome. (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 92 · Cited by 121
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Schumann P. Stackebrandt E. (2012). “Genus II. Cellulosimicrobium,” in Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology: The Actinobacteria Vol. 5 eds Whitman W. Goodfellow M. Kämpfer P. Busse H.-J. Trujillo M. Ludwig W. (New York, NY: Springer-Verlag) 1002– 1006.
- Authors
- Verce, M., De Vuyst, L., & Weckx, S.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Weckx, Stefan
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-03-13
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 479-479
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6424877
- OpenAlex
- W2921500204
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 11.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (OZR234, SRP7, IOF342)
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1119916N, 1119918N)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- water kefir, kefir grains, novel bacterial species, lactic acid bacteria, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Dekkera bruxellensis, microbial community diversity, fermentation metabolism, mannitol production, glycerol production, cross-feeding, amino acid supply, dextransucrase, exopolysaccharide production, Lactobacillus, Oenococcus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review