Cited by 79Probiotics and Fermented FoodsReproductive tract infections researchGut microbiota and health

Comparative Analysis of Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus crispatus Isolated From Human Urogenital and Gastrointestinal Tracts

Open access
Pan, Meichen, Hidalgo-Cantabrana, Claudio, Goh, Yong Jun, Sanozky-Dawes, Rosemary, Barrangou, Rodolphe·2020·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus gasseri are two of the main Lactobacillus species found in the healthy vaginal microbiome and have also previously been identified and isolated from the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract. These two ecological niches are fundamentally different, notably with regards to the epithelial cell type, nutrient availability, environmental conditions, pH and microbiome composition. Given the dramatic differences between these two environments, we characterized strains within the same Lactobacillus species isolated from either the vaginal or intestinal tract to assess whether they are phenotypically and genetically different. We performed a series of comparative phenotypic assays including small intestinal juice and acid resistance, carbohydrate fermentation profiles, lactic acid production, and host interaction with intestinal Caco-2 and vaginal VK2 cell lines. We also developed a simulated vaginal fluid (SVF) to study bacterial growth in a proxy vaginal environment and conducted differential transcriptomic analysis between SVF and standard laboratory MRS medium. Overall, our results show that although strain-specific variation is observed, some phenotypic differences seem associated with the isolation source. We encourage future probiotic formulation to include isolation source and take into consideration genetic and phenotypic features for use at various body sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03146

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Future probiotic formulations addressed to women's health should consider isolation source and carefully evaluate genetic and phenotypic characteristics of strains for targeted application in different body sites.

    “our findings suggest that future probiotic formulations addressed to women’s health should consider the isolation source and carefully evaluate the genetic and phenotypic characteristics of the strains for targeted application in different body sites.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 79

Authors
Pan, M., Hidalgo-Cantabrana, C., Goh, Y. J., Sanozky-Dawes, R., & Barrangou, R.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Barrangou, Rodolphe
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2020-01-22
Volume
10
Pages
3146-3146
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3001286609
Cited by
79
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
North Carolina State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus crispatus, vaginal microbiota, gastrointestinal tract, simulated vaginal fluid, acid resistance, carbohydrate fermentation, lactic acid production, host cell interactions, Caco-2 cells, probiotic formulation, isolation source

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review