Oxidative imbalance in Candida tropicalis biofilms and its relation with persister cells
Open accessAbstract
Background: Persister cells (PCs) make up a small fraction of microbial population, can survive lethal concentrations of antimicrobial agents. In recent years, Candida tropicalis has emerged as being a frequent fungal agent of medical devices subject to biofilm infections. However, PCs are still poorly understood. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the relation of PCs on the redox status in C. tropicalis biofilms exposed to high doses of Amphotericin B (AmB), and alterations in surface topography and the architecture of biofilms. Methods: We used an experimental model of two different C. tropicalis biofilms exposed to AmB at supra minimum inhibitory concentration (SMIC80), and the intra- and extracellular reactive oxygen species (iROS and eROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and oxidative stress response were studied. Light microscopy (LM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) were also used in conjunction with the image analysis software COMSTAT. Results: We demonstrated that biofilms derived from the PC fraction (B2) showed a higher capacity to respond to the stress generated upon AmB treatment, compared with biofilms obtained from planktonic cells. In B2, a lower ROS and RNS accumulation was observed in concordance with higher activation of the antioxidant systems, resulting in an oxidative imbalance of a smaller magnitude compared to B1. LM analysis revealed that the AmB treatment provoked a marked decrease of biomass, showing a loss of cellular aggrupation, with the presence of mostly yeast cells. Moreover, significant structural changes in the biofilm architecture were noted between both biofilms by CLSM—COMSTAT analysis. For B1, the quantitative parameters bio-volume, average micro-colony volume, surface to bio-volume ratio and surface coverage showed reductions upon AmB treatment, whereas increases were observed in roughness coefficient and average diffusion distance. In addition, untreated B2 was substantially smaller than B1, with less biomass and thickness values. The analysis of the above-mentioned parameters also showed changes in B2 upon AmB exposure. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study that has attempted to correlate PCs of Candida biofilms with alterations in the prooxidant-antioxidant balance and the architecture of the biofilms. The finding of regular and PCs with different cellular stress status may help to solve the puzzle of biofilm resistance, with redox imbalance possibly being an important factor.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Persister cells' biofilms had distinct architectural structures and exhibited significantly enhanced antioxidant capacity compared to those formed by normal planktonic cells.
“It has been found that persister cells’ biofilms had distinct architectural structures and exhibited significantly enhanced antioxidant capacity compared to those formed by normal planktonic cells [72].”
From Antifungal persistence: Clinical relevance and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [72]
The Results (Experimental Model “Biofilm 1-Biofilm 2”; page not provided) report architectural differences between Candida tropicalis biofilms derived from persister cells (B2) and planktonic cells (B1), and higher antioxidant capacity in B2 after amphotericin B treatment. However, the reported between-biofilm difference in antioxidant capacity is #p > 0.01; the Statistical Analysis section defines #p < 0.01 as significant. The claim’s 'significantly enhanced' qualifier is therefore not supported. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFormation of persister cells does not require biofilm formation, but biofilm-containing persister populations are more tolerant of oxidative stress and better resist the fungicidal effects of AmB.
“The formation of persister cells does not require biofilm formation, but biofilm-containing persister populations are more tolerant of oxidative stress and better resist the fungicidal effects of AmB [125].”
From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [125]
The Discussion reports a higher antioxidant response in C. tropicalis biofilms derived from persister cells, and the Results report a smaller biomass reduction after AmB treatment than in the comparison biofilms (69% versus 78%). But the paper does not establish that Candida persister formation requires no biofilm: its Introduction says no persister cells had been isolated from Candida planktonic cultures. The Results also report unchanged MIC and MFC values and similarly small persister populations after the two AmB exposures, so the claim of better resistance to AmB killing needs qualification. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- da Silva, M. A., Baronetti, J. L., Páez, P. L., & Paraje, M. G.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Corresponding author
- Paraje, María G.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-02-02
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 598834-598834
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7884318
- OpenAlex
- W3127323764
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Harvard University
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (411/2018)
- Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva (144/2018, 411/2018)
- Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología
- Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (CONICET)
- Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (1442/2015)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- Candida tropicalis, biofilm, persister cells, oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species, amphotericin B, biofilm structure, antioxidant response, antifungal resistance, medical device infections, planktonic versus biofilm cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review