Cited by 16Probiotics and Fermented FoodsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyAquaculture disease management and microbiota

Genome sequence and evaluation of safety and probiotic potential of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei LC86 and Lacticaseibacillus casei LC89

Open access
Chen, Ting, Zhao, Yunjiao, Fan, Yixuan, Dong, Yao, Gai, Zhonghui·2025·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

Aim: A comprehensive safety assessment of potential probiotic strains was essential for their application in the food industry. This article systematically evaluated the probiotic characteristics, whole-genome sequence analysis and safety of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei LC86 and Lacticaseibacillus casei LC89. Methods: Firstly, the two strains of lactic acid bacteria selected were identified. Secondly, whole-genome sequencing was performed on LC86 and LC89, and their antibiotic resistance, pathogenicity, and virulence genes were analyzed. We tested various properties of the two strains, included tolerance, cell adhesion, hemolytic activity, catalase activity, gelatin hydrolysis, arginine hydrolysis ability, bile salt hydrolysis capacity, mucin degradation, bioamine, D-/L-lactic acid production and antibiotic susceptibility, to confirm the safety of LC86 and LC89 both in vitro and in vivo . Additionally, we studied the acute toxicity of LC86 and LC89 in mice through a 14-day oral gavage experiment. Results: The two strains selected were identified as Lacticaseibacillus paracasei and Lacticaseibacillus casei . The genomes of both LC86 and LC89 were devoid of virulence, antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity genes. LC86 and LC89 exhibited good tolerance to temperature, artificial gastric fluid and artificial intestinal fluid; they were non-hemolytic, their catalase activity, gelatin hydrolysis, arginine hydrolysis and bile salt hydrolysis were all negative. They exhibited the capability to break down proteins and demonstrated sensitivity to a range of antibiotics. The oral LD 50 for both LC86 and LC89 in mice was >2 × 10 10 CFU/kg. Conclusion: The experimental results above demonstrated the probiotic characteristics and safety of LC86 and LC89, indicating their potential as candidates for probiotics for human and animal applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1501502

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hemolysins are potent virulence factors that facilitate systemic dissemination by lysing host red blood cells and degrading the epithelial barrier, leading to opportunistic infections.

    “Hemolysins are classified as potent virulence factors that facilitate systemic dissemination by lysing host red blood cells and degrading the epithelial barrier, thereby leading to opportunistic infections82.”

    From Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus acidophilus TMPC 41127 isolated from traditional cheese in inhibiting Salmonella Typhi biofilms and virulence genes (2026) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Discussion (page not provided) states that hemolytic activity lyses red blood cells. It does not say that hemolysins degrade the epithelial barrier, facilitate systemic dissemination, or cause opportunistic infections; its separate discussion of mucosal-barrier disruption concerns arginine hydrolysis and mucin degradation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 16

Authors
Chen, T., Zhao, Y., Fan, Y., Dong, Y., & Gai, Z.
Affiliations
Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gai, Zhonghui
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2025-01-27
Volume
15
Pages
1501502-1501502
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406850229
Cited by
16
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
Keywords
probiotic safety, whole genome sequencing, virulence genes, antibiotic resistance genes, bile salt hydrolysis, bile tolerance, gastric acid tolerance, acute oral toxicity, lactic acid production, mucin degradation, lactic acid bacteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review