Artificially intelligent modeling of macromolecular assemblies
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The study of macromolecular assembly formation is one of the most challenging tasks in computational modeling as it requires extensive exploration of conformational and configurational space, especially when driven by conformational transitions or folding instabilities, which are typically associated with high energy barriers. Although this type of study has traditionally been addressed in silico by using techniques that reduce the computational cost of simulations, such as coarse-grained models, artificial intelligence (AI) has recently entered the field at multiple levels, aiding in parameter optimization or trajectory analysis and even replacing potentials or force calculations. Recently developed algorithms such as AlphaFold (AF) and RoseTTAFold enable the direct prediction of final structures with high efficiency and confidence, an achievement that earned them the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. In this study, we review and analyze the different AI-based strategies used to model protein structure and dynamics and simulate macromolecular assemblies, comparing them with traditional methods, to highlight their respective advantages and limitations. By placing these approaches along an ideal continuum in which accuracy increases as interpretability decreases, we show that hybrid solutions and combinations of methods can be devised to maximize their strengths. Finally, we perspectively outline practical strategies for implementing such integrated approaches in a coherent manner, preserving accuracy and feasibility while maintaining insight into aggregation pathways, intermediate structures, and the molecular mechanisms underlying the phenomenon.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?
Keskin, O., Gursoy, A., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040409x · Cited by 697 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Bini, M., & Tozzini, V.
- Affiliations
- Scuola Normale Superiore (IT)
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (IT)
- Venue
- Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2026-10-01
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 1856649-1856649
- ISSN
- 2296-889X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7215065871
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Commissione Scientifica Nazionale 5, Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- macromolecular complexes, protein aggregation, protein folding, AlphaFold, RoseTTAFold, protein structure prediction, protein dynamics, hybrid modeling, conformational change, folding intermediates, aggregation pathways, energy barrier
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review