Improved cerebral oxygenation response and executive performance as a function of cardiorespiratory fitness in older women: a fNIRS study
Open accessAbstract
Cardiorespiratory fitness has been shown to protect and enhance cognitive and brain functions, but little is known about the cortical mechanisms that underlie these changes in older adults. In this study, functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to investigate variations in oxyhemoglobin [HbO2] and in deoxyhemoglobin [HHb] in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during the performance of an executive control task in older women with different levels of cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max). Thirty-four women aged 60-77 years were classified as high-fit and low-fit based on VO2max measures. They all performed a control counting (CNT) task and the Random Number Generation (RNG) task at two different paces (1 number/1 s and 1 number/1.5 s), allowing to manipulate task difficulty, while hemodynamic responses in the bilateral DLPFCs were recorded using continuous-wave NIRS. The behavioral data revealed that the high-fit women showed significantly better performance on the RNG tasks compared with the low-fit women. The high-fit women showed significant increases in [HbO2] responses in both left and right DLPFCs during the RNG task, while the low-fit women showed significantly less activation in the right DLPFC compared with the right DLPFC of the high-fit women and compared with their own left DLPFC. At the level of the whole sample, increases in the [HbO2] responses in the right DLPFC were found to mediate in part the relationship between VO2max level and executive performance during the RNG task at 1.5 s but not at 1 s. These results provide support for the cardiorespiratory fitness hypothesis and suggest that higher levels of aerobic fitness in older women are related to increased cerebral oxygen supply to the DLPFC, sustaining better cognitive performance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A higher level of cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with favorable functional brain changes in younger adults and older adults.
“(ii) favorable functional brain changes in younger adults (Stillman et al., 2018) and older adults (Colcombe et al., 2004; Albinet et al., 2014; Dupuy et al., 2015; Hyodo et al., 2016)”
From Dose-Response Matters! - A Perspective on the Exercise Prescription in Exercise-Cognition Research (2019) · cites this paper as Albinet et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 65
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Brown A. D. McMorris C. A. Longman R. S. Leigh R. Hill M. D. Friedenreich C. M. (2010). Effects of cardiorespiratory fitness and cerebral blood flow on cognitive outcomes in older women. Neurobiol. Aging 31, 2047– 2057 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.11.002 19111937 · DOI
- Cabeza R. Nyberg L. Park D. (2005). Cognitive Neuroscience of Aging: Linking Cognitive and Cerebral Aging. New York: Oxford University Press
- Colcombe S. Kramer A. F. (2003). Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychol. Sci. 14, 125– 130 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01430 12661673 · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Albinet, C. T., Mandrick, K., Bernard, P. L., Perrey, S., & Blain, H.
- Affiliations
- Université Montpellier 1 (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR)
- Venue
- Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014-10-08
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 272-272
- ISSN
- 1663-4365 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4189417
- OpenAlex
- W2117430650
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Université de Poitiers
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- cardiorespiratory fitness, executive function, older women, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cerebral oxygenation, oxyhemoglobin, deoxyhemoglobin, VO2max, cognitive aging, hemodynamic response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review