Decreased Deposition of Beta-Amyloid 1-38 and Increased Deposition of Beta-Amyloid 1-42 in Brain Tissue of Presenilin-1 E280A Familial Alzheimer’s Disease Patients
Open accessAbstract
Familial Alzheimer's Disease (FAD) caused by Presenilin-1 (PS1) mutations is characterized by early onset, cognitive impairment, and dementia. Impaired gamma secretase function favors production of longer beta-amyloid species in PS1 FAD. The PS1 E280A mutation is the largest FAD kindred under study. Here, we studied beta-amyloid deposits in PS1 E280A FAD brains in comparison to sporadic Alzheimer's disease (SAD). We analyzed cortices and cerebellum from 10 FAD and 10 SAD brains using immunohistochemistry to determine total beta-amyloid, hyperphosphorylated tau (pTau), and specific beta-amyloid peptides 1-38, 1-40, 1-42, and 1-43. Additionally, we studied beta-amyloid subspecies by ELISA, and vessel pathology was detected with beta-amyloid 1-42 and truncated pyroglutamylated beta-amyloid antibodies. There were no significant differences in total beta-amyloid signal between SAD and FAD. Beta-amyloid 1-38 and 1-43 loads were increased, and 1-42 loads were decreased in frontal cortices of SAD when compared to FAD. Beta-amyloid species assessment by ELISA resembled our findings by immunohistochemical analysis. Differences in beta-amyloid 1-38 and 1-42 levels between SAD and FAD were evidenced by using beta-amyloid length-specific antibodies, reflecting a gamma secretase-dependent shift in beta-amyloid processing in FAD cases. The use of beta-amyloid length-specific antibodies for postmortem assessment of beta-amyloid pathology can differentiate between SAD and PS1 FAD cases and it can be useful for identification of SAD cases potentially affected with gamma secretase dysfunction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The percentage of p-tau was higher in FAD than in SAD, and the lowest levels were found in APOEch, which was similar to CNT.
“Similarly, the percentage of p‐tau was higher in FAD than in SAD, as previously reported [77], but the lowest levels were found in APOEch which was similar to CNT (Figure 1C,D).”
From Gliovascular alterations in sporadic and familial Alzheimer's disease: <scp><i>APOE3</i></scp> Christchurch homozygote glioprotection (2023) · cites this paper as [77]
The Results section reports significantly higher pTau signal in FAD than SAD, but specifically in the occipital cortex and cerebellum; the Discussion says significance was limited to those regions. The citation follows “as previously reported,” so the APOEch and CNT comparison, which the citing sentence assigns to its own Figure 1, is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPrevious studies of our group have identified molecular differences between SAD and FAD in addition to divergences in clinical manifestations.
“Previous studies of our group have identified molecular differences between SAD and FAD [55, 56, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79] in addition to divergences in the clinical manifestations [55, 56].”
From Gliovascular alterations in sporadic and familial Alzheimer's disease: <scp><i>APOE3</i></scp> Christchurch homozygote glioprotection (2023) · cites this paper as [77]
The distribution of CAA in this case contrasted to more generalized distribution of CAA in other PSEN1 E280A cases.
“which contrasted to more generalized distribution of CAA in other PSEN1 E280A cases [7, 22].”
From Distinct tau neuropathology and cellular profiles of an APOE3 Christchurch homozygote protected against autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s dementia (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
The Results section on CAA pathology (Figure 6) reports severe CAA in PSEN1 E280A cases, but does not describe its distribution across brain regions. The Methods specify that CAA was assessed in frontal-cortex vessels; the reported regional distribution concerns Aβ plaques, not CAA. A more generalized distribution of CAA in other cases therefore cannot be verified from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Dinkel, F., Trujillo-Rodriguez, D., Villegas, A., Streffer, J., Mercken, M., Lopera, F., Glatzel, M., & Sepulveda-Falla, D.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
- Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
- Venue
- Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-07-28
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 220-220
- ISSN
- 1663-4365 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7399638
- OpenAlex
- W3046188610
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (111554531651)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- familial Alzheimer's disease, presenilin-1 E280A mutation, amyloid-beta deposition, amyloid-beta 42, sporadic Alzheimer's disease, hyperphosphorylated tau, frontal cortex, cerebellum, postmortem neuropathology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review