Cited by 53Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Developmental Trajectories of Associative Memory from Childhood to Adulthood: A Behavioral and Neuroimaging Study

Open access
Guillery-Girard, Bérengère, Martins, Sylvie, Deshayes, Sebastien, Hertz-Pannier, Lucie, Chiron, Catherine, Jambaqué, Isabelle, Landeau, Brigitte, Clochon, Patrice +2 more·2013·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Episodic memory refers to the capacity to bind multimodal memories to constitute a unique personal event. Most developmental studies on episodic memory focused on one specific component, i.e., the core factual information. The present study examines the relevance of a novel episodic paradigm to assess its developmental trajectories in a more comprehensive way according to the type of association (item-feature, item-location, and item-sequence associations) with measures of both objective and subjective recollection. We conducted a behavioral study aimed at testing the effects of age in a large sample of 160 children, adolescents, and young adults (6-23 years old). We confronted the behavioral data to the neural correlates in a subgroup of 30 children using voxel-based morphometry. Behavioral data outlined differential developmental trajectories according to the type of association, with a continuous increase of factual associative memory efficiency until 10 years, a linear increase of performance in spatial associative memory that pursues until early adulthood and an abrupt increase in temporal associative memory efficiency between 9 and 10. Regarding recollection, measures showed a more pronounced enhancement from 9 to 10 years. Hence, behavioral data highlight a peculiar period in late childhood (8-10 years old) crucial for the developmental time course of episodic memory. Regarding structural data, we found that the improvement of associative memory efficiency was related to a decrease in gray matter volume in a large cerebral network including the dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (and superior and anterior temporal regions), and the hippocampus bilaterally. These data suggest that multimodal integration would probably be related to the maturation of temporal regions and modulated by a fronto-parietal network. Besides, our findings emphasize the relevance of the present paradigm to assess episodic memory especially in the clinical setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00126

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Memory specifically increases between the ages of 6 and 12, and then goes on to slightly increase during adolescence.

    “Memory specifically increases between the ages of 6 and 12, and then goes on to slightly increase during adolescence [29, 30].”

    From Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects (2017) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results (Behavioral results) show improvement in associative-memory scores from ages 6 to 10, but do not establish a general increase through age 12. From adolescence to adulthood, only spatial associative memory increased significantly; the overall episodic score did not. The claimed slight increase during adolescence therefore overgeneralizes the finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 53

Authors
Guillery-Girard, B., Martins, S., Deshayes, S., Hertz-Pannier, L., Chiron, C., Jambaqué, I., Landeau, B., Clochon, P., Chételat, G., & Eustache, F.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
7
Pages
126-126
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973562013
Cited by
53
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic memory, associative memory, memory development, childhood, adolescence, early adulthood, recollection, spatial memory, temporal memory, gray matter volume, prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, temporal lobe, frontoparietal network, multimodal integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review