Cited by 76Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Genetic imaging of the association of oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) polymorphisms with positive maternal parenting

Open access
Michalska, Kalina J., Decety, Jean, Liu, Chunyu, Chen, Qi, Martz, Meghan E., Jacob, Suma, Hipwell, Alison E., Lee, Steve S. +3 more·2014·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Well-validated models of maternal behavior in small-brain mammals posit a central role of oxytocin in parenting, by reducing stress and enhancing the reward value of social interactions with offspring. In contrast, human studies are only beginning to gain insights into how oxytocin modulates maternal behavior and affiliation. METHODS: To explore associations between oxytocin receptor genes and maternal parenting behavior in humans, we conducted a genetic imaging study of women selected to exhibit a wide range of observed parenting when their children were 4-6 years old. RESULTS: In response to child stimuli during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), hemodynamic responses in brain regions that mediate affect, reward, and social behavior were significantly correlated with observed positive parenting. Furthermore, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs53576 and rs1042778) in the gene encoding the oxytocin receptor were significantly associated with both positive parenting and hemodynamic responses to child stimuli in orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and hippocampus. CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to the emerging literature on the role of oxytocin in human social behavior and support the feasibility of tracing biological pathways from genes to neural regions to positive maternal parenting behaviors in humans using genetic imaging methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mothers with the AA genotype of the OT receptor gene, which has been associated with greater receptor expressions, showed significantly higher levels of positive parenting as well as greater neural responses to images of their own children compared to mothers with the GA and GG genotypes.

    “Supporting the importance of OT in the central brain for parenting, mothers with the AA genotype, which has been associated with greater receptor expressions, showed significantly higher levels of positive parenting as well as greater neural responses to images of their own children compared to mothers with the GA and GG genotypes (Michalska et al., 2014).”

    From The maternal brain and its plasticity in humans (2016) · cites this paper as Michalska et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 76

Authors
Michalska, K. J., Decety, J., Liu, C., Chen, Q., Martz, M. E., Jacob, S., Hipwell, A. E., Lee, S. S., Chronis-Tuscano, A., Waldman, I. D., & Lahey, B. B.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Michalska, Kalina J.
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2014
Volume
8
Pages
21-21
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972960696
Cited by
76
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6
FWCI
17.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Brain Research Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH53554, R01MH053554, MH-53554)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD067185)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
oxytocin receptor gene, OXTR polymorphisms, oxytocin, single nucleotide polymorphisms, rs53576, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, maternal behavior, reward processing, social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review