Cited by 150Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Optogenetic insights on the relationship between anxiety-related behaviors and social deficits

Open access
Allsop, Stephen A., Vander Weele, Caitlin M., Wichmann, Romy, Tye, Kay M.·2014·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Many psychiatric illnesses are characterized by deficits in the social domain. For example, there is a high rate of co-morbidity between autism spectrum disorders and anxiety disorders. However, the common neural circuit mechanisms by which social deficits and other psychiatric disease states, such as anxiety, are co-expressed remains unclear. Here, we review optogenetic investigations of neural circuits in animal models of anxiety-related behaviors and social behaviors and discuss the important role of the amygdala in mediating aspects of these behaviors. In particular, we focus on recent evidence that projections from the basolateral amygdala (BLA) to the ventral hippocampus (vHPC) modulate anxiety-related behaviors and also alter social interaction. Understanding how this circuit influences both social behavior and anxiety may provide a mechanistic explanation for the pathogenesis of social anxiety disorder, as well as the prevalence of patients co-diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders and anxiety disorders. Furthermore, elucidating how circuits that modulate social behavior also mediate other complex emotional states will lead to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms by which social deficits are expressed in psychiatric disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00241

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For a truly mechanistic understanding of the neural underpinnings of anxiety, the ability to manipulate specific circuit components is required, demanding the use of next-generation technologies in model organisms.

    “For a truly mechanistic understanding of the neural underpinnings of anxiety, the ability to manipulate specific circuit components is required, demanding the use of next-generation technologies in model organisms21.”

    From Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety (2015) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 252 · Cited by 150

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hau J. Schapiro S. J. Van Hoosier G. L. Jr. (2002). Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science, 2nd Edn. Animal Models. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press
  2. Institute of Medicine (US) Forum on Neuroscience Nervous System. (2008). Challenges and Technical Limitations. Text. Available online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK50998/
  3. Pinel J. P. J. Treit D. (1983). The conditioned defensive burying paradigm and behavioral neuroscience, in Behavioral Approaches to Brain Research, ed Robinson T. E. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 212– 234

Authors
Allsop, S. A., Vander Weele, C. M., Wichmann, R., & Tye, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Tye, Kay M.
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2014-07-16
Volume
8
Pages
241-241
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005559664
Cited by
150
References
252
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Frontiers Research Foundation
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • JPB Foundation
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • National Institutes of Health (R01-MH102441, R01-MH102441-01)
  • Simons Center for the Social Brain, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • National Institute of Mental Health (DP2-DK-102256, R01MH102441, T32MH074249, R01‐MH102441‐01, MH102441)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007484, NIGMS T32)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DP2DK102256)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
anxiety-like behavior, social dysfunction, social anxiety disorder, autism spectrum disorder, anxiety disorders, amygdala, basolateral amygdala, ventral hippocampus, optogenetics, psychiatric comorbidity, neural circuits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review