Optogenetic insights on the relationship between anxiety-related behaviors and social deficits
Open accessAbstract
Many psychiatric illnesses are characterized by deficits in the social domain. For example, there is a high rate of co-morbidity between autism spectrum disorders and anxiety disorders. However, the common neural circuit mechanisms by which social deficits and other psychiatric disease states, such as anxiety, are co-expressed remains unclear. Here, we review optogenetic investigations of neural circuits in animal models of anxiety-related behaviors and social behaviors and discuss the important role of the amygdala in mediating aspects of these behaviors. In particular, we focus on recent evidence that projections from the basolateral amygdala (BLA) to the ventral hippocampus (vHPC) modulate anxiety-related behaviors and also alter social interaction. Understanding how this circuit influences both social behavior and anxiety may provide a mechanistic explanation for the pathogenesis of social anxiety disorder, as well as the prevalence of patients co-diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders and anxiety disorders. Furthermore, elucidating how circuits that modulate social behavior also mediate other complex emotional states will lead to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms by which social deficits are expressed in psychiatric disease.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For a truly mechanistic understanding of the neural underpinnings of anxiety, the ability to manipulate specific circuit components is required, demanding the use of next-generation technologies in model organisms.
“For a truly mechanistic understanding of the neural underpinnings of anxiety, the ability to manipulate specific circuit components is required, demanding the use of next-generation technologies in model organisms21.”
From Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety (2015) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 252 · Cited by 150
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Hau J. Schapiro S. J. Van Hoosier G. L. Jr. (2002). Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science, 2nd Edn. Animal Models. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press
- Institute of Medicine (US) Forum on Neuroscience Nervous System. (2008). Challenges and Technical Limitations. Text. Available online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK50998/
- Pinel J. P. J. Treit D. (1983). The conditioned defensive burying paradigm and behavioral neuroscience, in Behavioral Approaches to Brain Research, ed Robinson T. E. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 212– 234
- Authors
- Allsop, S. A., Vander Weele, C. M., Wichmann, R., & Tye, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tye, Kay M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014-07-16
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 241-241
- ISSN
- 1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4099964
- OpenAlex
- W2005559664
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 252
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Frontiers Research Foundation
- Funders
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- JPB Foundation
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- National Institutes of Health (R01-MH102441, R01-MH102441-01)
- Simons Center for the Social Brain, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- National Institute of Mental Health (DP2-DK-102256, R01MH102441, T32MH074249, R01‐MH102441‐01, MH102441)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007484, NIGMS T32)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DP2DK102256)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- anxiety-like behavior, social dysfunction, social anxiety disorder, autism spectrum disorder, anxiety disorders, amygdala, basolateral amygdala, ventral hippocampus, optogenetics, psychiatric comorbidity, neural circuits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review