Cited by 57Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Prefrontal Dopaminergic Mechanisms of Extinction in Adolescence Compared to Adulthood in Rats

Open access
Zbukvic, Isabel C., Park, Chun Hui J., Ganella, Despina E., Lawrence, Andrew J., Kim, Jee Hyun·2017·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Adolescents with anxiety disorders attain poorer outcomes following extinction-based treatment compared to adults. Extinction deficit during adolescence has been identified to involve immaturity in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Findings from adult rodents suggest extinction involves dopamine signaling in the mPFC. This system changes dramatically during adolescence, but its role in adolescent extinction is unknown. Therefore, we investigated the role of prefrontal dopamine in extinction using Pavlovian fear conditioning in adolescent and adult rats. Using quantitative PCR (qPCR) analyses, we measured changes in dopamine receptor gene expression in the mPFC before and after extinction. We then enhanced dopamine 1 receptor (D1R) or dopamine 2 receptor (D2R) signaling in the infralimbic cortex (IL) of the mPFC using agonists at the time of extinction. Adolescent rats displayed a deficit in extinction retention compared to adults. Extinction induced a reduction in D1R compared to D2R gene expression in adolescent rats, whereas an increase of D1R compared to D2R gene expression was observed in adult rats. Acutely enhancing IL D1R signaling using SKF-81297 had no effect on extinction at either age. In contrast, acutely enhancing IL D2R signaling with quinpirole significantly enhanced long-term extinction in adolescents, and impaired within-session extinction in adults. Our results suggest a dissociated role for prefrontal dopamine in fear extinction during adolescence compared to adulthood. Findings highlight the dopamine system as a potential pharmacological target to improve extinction-based treatments for adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00032

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents continue to show signs of defensive responding to previously learned threat cues, suggesting an age-specific relative dysregulation of the process that updates threat associations as safe.

    “For example, adolescents continue to show signs of defensive responding to previously learned threat cues (freezing in rodents and elevated skin conductance in humans), suggesting an age-specific relative dysregulation of the process that updates threat associations as safe7,10–13.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 57

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Paxinos G. Watson C. (1998). The Rat Brain Atlas in Stereotaxic Coordinates. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Authors
Zbukvic, I. C., Park, C. H. J., Ganella, D. E., Lawrence, A. J., & Kim, J. H.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jee Hyun
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2017-02-22
Volume
11
Pages
32-32
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2590359509
Cited by
57
References
88
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1083309, APP1020737)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
fear extinction, adolescence, prefrontal dopamine, medial prefrontal cortex, infralimbic cortex, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, fear conditioning, anxiety disorders, quinpirole, SKF 81297, receptor gene expression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review