Cited by 35Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Training Rats Using Water Rewards Without Water Restriction

Open access
Reinagel, Pamela·2018·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

High-throughput behavioral training of rodents has been a transformative development for systems neuroscience. Water or food restriction is typically required to motivate task engagement. We hypothesized a gap between physiological water need and hedonic water satiety that could be leveraged to train rats for water rewards without water restriction. We show that when Citric Acid (CA) is added to water, female rats drink less, yet consume enough to maintain long term health. With 24 hour/day access to a visual task with water rewards, rats with ad lib CA water performed 84%±18% as many trials as in the same task under water restriction. In 2-hour daily sessions, rats with ad lib CA water performed 68%±13% as many trials as under water restriction. Using reward sizes <25ul, rats with ad lib CA performed 804±285 trials/day in live-in sessions or 364±82 trials/day in limited duration daily sessions. The safety of CA water amendment was previously shown for male rats, and the gap between water need and satiety was similar to what we observed in females. Therefore it is likely that this method will generalize to male rats, although this remains to be shown. We conclude that at least in some contexts rats can be trained using water rewards without water restriction, benefiting both animal welfare and scientific productivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00084

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 35

Authors
Reinagel, P.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Reinagel, Pamela
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2018-05-03
Volume
12
Pages
84-84
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801846716
Cited by
35
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
University of California, San Diego
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
water reward, water restriction, citric acid, female rats, animal welfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review