The DOI matches its Crossref record; 213 of the 213 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organic electrode coatings for next-generation neural interfaces
Open accessAbstract
Traditional neuronal interfaces utilize metallic electrodes which in recent years have reached a plateau in terms of the ability to provide safe stimulation at high resolution or rather with high densities of microelectrodes with improved spatial selectivity. To achieve higher resolution it has become clear that reducing the size of electrodes is required to enable higher electrode counts from the implant device. The limitations of interfacing electrodes including low charge injection limits, mechanical mismatch and foreign body response can be addressed through the use of organic electrode coatings which typically provide a softer, more roughened surface to enable both improved charge transfer and lower mechanical mismatch with neural tissue. Coating electrodes with conductive polymers or carbon nanotubes offers a substantial increase in charge transfer area compared to conventional platinum electrodes. These organic conductors provide safe electrical stimulation of tissue while avoiding undesirable chemical reactions and cell damage. However, the mechanical properties of conductive polymers are not ideal, as they are quite brittle. Hydrogel polymers present a versatile coating option for electrodes as they can be chemically modified to provide a soft and conductive scaffold. However, the in vivo chronic inflammatory response of these conductive hydrogels remains unknown. A more recent approach proposes tissue engineering the electrode interface through the use of encapsulated neurons within hydrogel coatings. This approach may provide a method for activating tissue at the cellular scale, however, several technological challenges must be addressed to demonstrate feasibility of this innovative idea. The review focuses on the various organic coatings which have been investigated to improve neural interface electrodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Amyloid oligomers exacerbate tau pathology in a mouse model of tauopathy
Selenica, M.-L. B., Brownlow, M., Jimenez, J. P., Lee, D. C., Pena, G., Dickey, C. A., Gordon, M. N., & Morgan, D. (2013) · Neurodegenerative Diseases · doi:10.1159/000337230 · Cited by 10,359
Carbon Nanotubes: Present and Future Commercial Applications
De Volder, M. F. L., Tawfick, S. H., Baughman, R. H., & Hart, A. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1222453 · Cited by 5,587
Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering
Lee, K. Y., & Mooney, D. J. (2001) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr000108x · Cited by 5,277
Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications
Drury, J. L., & Mooney, D. J. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00340-5 · Cited by 5,136
Hydrogels for biomedical applications
Hoffman, A. S. (2002) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00239-3 · Cited by 4,864
Chen, Z., Ren, W., Gao, L., Liu, B., Pei, S., & Cheng, H.-M. (2011) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3001 · Cited by 3,834
Cell Adhesion: The Molecular Basis of Tissue Architecture and Morphogenesis
Gumbiner, B. M. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81279-9 · Cited by 3,471
Neural Stimulation and Recording Electrodes
Cogan, S. F. (2008) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160518 · Cited by 2,243
Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols
Merrill, D. R., Bikson, M., & Jefferys, J. G. R. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020 · Cited by 2,078
Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes
Polikov, V. S., Tresco, P. A., & Reichert, W. M. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.08.015 · Cited by 1,896
Cited by
Yuk, H., Lu, B., & Zhao, X. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00595h · Cited by 2,108
Electronic dura mater for long-term multimodal neural interfaces
Minev, I. R., Musienko, P., Hirsch, A., Barraud, Q., Wenger, N., Moraud, E. M., Gandar, J., Capogrosso, M., Milekovic, T., Asboth, L., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1260318 · Cited by 1,082
Materials and technologies for soft implantable neuroprostheses
Lacour, S. P., Courtine, G., & Guck, J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.63 · Cited by 738
Neural recording and modulation technologies
Chen, R., Canales, A., & Anikeeva, P. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.93 · Cited by 655
Next-generation probes, particles, and proteins for neural interfacing
Rivnay, J., Wang, H., Fenno, L., Deisseroth, K., & Malliaras, G. G. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601649 · Cited by 514
Metadata
- Authors
- Aregueta-Robles, U. A., Woolley, A. J., Poole-Warren, L. A., Lovell, N. H., & Green, R. A.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroengineering
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014-05-27
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 15-15
- ISSN
- 1662-6443 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093896099
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 213
- FWCI
- 11.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organic electrode coatings for next-generation neural interfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fneng.2014.00015
- The paper
- Aregueta-Robles, U. A., Woolley, A. J., Poole-Warren, L. A., Lovell, N. H., & Green, R. A. (2014). Organic electrode coatings for next-generation neural interfaces. Frontiers in Neuroengineering. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.