Cited by 51Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNuclear Receptors and Signaling

Monocyte Function in Parkinson's Disease and the Impact of Autologous Serum on Phagocytosis

Open access
Wijeyekoon, Ruwani S., Kronenberg-Versteeg, Deborah, Scott, Kirsten M., Hayat, Shaista, Jones, Joanne L., Clatworthy, Menna R., Floto, R. Andres, Barker, Roger A. +1 more·2018·Frontiers in Neurology

Abstract

Background - Increasing evidence implicates involvement of the innate immune system in the initiation and progression of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Monocytes and monocyte-derived cells perform a number of functions such as phagocytosis, chemotaxis and cytokine secretion, which may be particularly relevant to PD pathology. The behaviour of these cells in early-moderate disease, in conditions more similar to the in-vivo environment has not been fully evaluated. Research Question – Does monocyte function, including phagocytosis, chemotaxis and cytokine secretion, differ in early-moderate PD compared to age and gender-matched controls? Methods - Participants included PD patients (n=41) with early-moderate stage disease (Hoehn and Yahr ≤ 2) and age and gender matched controls (n=41). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from whole blood and monocytes were further separated using CD14 magnetic beads. Functional assays, including bead phagocytosis (in standard medium and autologous serum), Boyden chamber trans-well chemotaxis, and cytokine secretion on lipopolysaccharide stimulation were performed. Monocyte surface markers relating to chemotaxis were measured using immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Between-group analysis was performed using paired t-tests. Results – An autologous serum environment significantly increased bead phagocytosis compared to standard medium as expected, in both patients and controls. When in autologous serum, PD monocytes demonstrated enhanced phagocytosis compared to control monocytes (p=0.029). The level of serum-based phagocytosis was influenced by complement inactivation and the origin of the serum. There were no significant differences between PD and controls in terms of standard medium based monocyte migration or cytokine secretion in this cohort. Conclusions - Autologous serum has a significant influence on monocyte phagocytosis and reveals increased phagocytic capacity in early-moderate PD compared to controls. These conditions may better reflect the function of monocytes in-vivo in PD patients than standard medium based phagocytosis assays. Further studies will be required to replicate these results in larger cohorts, including earlier and later stages of disease, and to understand which serum factors are responsible for this observation and the potential mechanistic relevance to PD pathogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fneur.2018.00870

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peripheral monocytes have been shown to enhance phagocytosis in autologous serum of patients with Parkinson's disease, supporting the involvement of innate immunity.

    “Peripheral monocytes have been shown to enhance phagocytosis in autologous serum of patients with Parkinson's disease, supporting the involvement of innate immunity.84”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wijeyekoon, R. S., Kronenberg-Versteeg, D., Scott, K. M., Hayat, S., Jones, J. L., Clatworthy, M. R., Floto, R. A., Barker, R. A., & Williams-Gray, C. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Wijeyekoon, Ruwani S.
Venue
Frontiers in Neurology
Published
2018-10-16
Volume
9
Pages
870-870
ISSN
1664-2295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896610227
Cited by
50
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • Addenbrooke's Charitable Trust, Cambridge University Hospitals
  • Rosetrees Trust
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, monocytes, phagocytosis, autologous serum, chemotaxis, cytokine production, innate immunity, complement inactivation, monocyte migration, peripheral blood mononuclear cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review