One-Year Prospective Study of Plasma Biomarkers From CNS in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To investigate the longitudinal evolution of three blood biomarkers: neurofilament light (NFL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and tau, in out-patients and hospitalized patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) compared to controls, along with their associations—in patients—with clinical injury characteristics and demographic variables, and ability to discriminate patients with mTBI from controls. Methods: A longitudinal observation study including 207 patients with mTBI, 84 age and sex-matched community controls (CCs) and 52 trauma controls (TCs). Blood samples were collected at 5 timepoints: acute (<24 h), 72 h (24–72 h post-injury), 2 weeks, 3 and 12 months. Injury-related, clinical and demographic variables were obtained at inclusion and brain MRI within 72 h. Results: Plasma GFAP and tau were most elevated acutely and NFL at 2 weeks and 3 months. The group of patients with mTBI and concurrent other somatic injuries (mTBI+) had the highest elevation in all biomarkers across time points, and were more likely to be victims of traffic accidents and violence. All biomarkers were positively associated with traumatic intracranial findings on MRI obtained within 72 h. Glial fibrillary acidic protein and NFL levels were associated with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and presence of other somatic injuries. Acute GFAP concentrations showed the highest discriminability between patients and controls with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.92. Acute tau and 2-week NFL concentrations showed moderate discriminability (AUC = 0.70 and AUC = 0.75, respectively). Tau showed high discriminability between mTBI+ and TCs (AUC = 0.80). Conclusions: The association of plasma NFL with traumatic intracranial MRI findings, together with its later peak, could reflect ongoing secondary injury or repair mechanisms, allowing for a protracted diagnostic time window. Patients experiencing both mTBI and other injuries appear to be a subgroup with greater neural injury, differing from both the mTBI without other injuries and from both control groups. Acute GFAP concentrations showed the highest discriminability between patients and controls, were highly associated with intracranial traumatic injury, and showed the largest elevations compared to controls at the acute timepoint, suggesting it to be the most clinically useful plasma biomarker of primary CNS injury in mTBI.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TBI is a biphasic injury: after the mechanical primary injury, a secondary dystrophic state produces long-term dysfunction including elevated neuroinflammation due to blood-brain barrier disruption, increased oxidative stress, and persistent changes in the microglial population.
“TBI is a biphasic injury: after the mechanical primary injury, a secondary dystrophic state produces long-term dysfunction in the brain that includes elevated neuroinflammation as a result of blood-brain barrier disruption, increased oxidative stress, and persistent changes in the microglial population [100–106].”
From Untangling senescent and damage‐associated microglia in the aging and diseased brain (2023) · cites this paper as [106]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Clarke, G. J. B., Skandsen, T., Zetterberg, H., Einarsen, C. E., Feyling, C., Follestad, T., Vik, A., Blennow, K., & Håberg, A. K.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neurology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-04-21
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 643743-643743
- ISSN
- 1664-2295 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8097004
- OpenAlex
- W3154230710
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
- Helse- og Omsorgsdepartementet
- Helse Midt-Norge
- Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset
- St. Olavs Hospital Universitetssykehuset i Trondheim
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
- Keywords
- mild traumatic brain injury, plasma biomarkers, neurofilament light chain, glial fibrillary acidic protein, tau protein, blood biomarkers, intracranial injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, diagnostic biomarkers, secondary injury, traffic accidents, brain MRI findings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review