Cited by 124Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

Look at this: the neural correlates of initiating and responding to bids for joint attention

Open access
Redcay, Elizabeth, Kleiner, Mario, Saxe, Rebecca·2012·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

When engaging in joint attention, one person directs another person's attention to an object (Initiating Joint Attention, IJA), and the second person's attention follows (Responding to Joint Attention, RJA). As such, joint attention must occur within the context of a social interaction. This ability is critical to language and social development; yet the neural bases for this pivotal skill remain understudied. This paucity of research is likely due to the challenge in acquiring functional MRI data during a naturalistic, contingent social interaction. To examine the neural bases of both IJA and RJA we implemented a dual-video set-up that allowed for a face-to-face interaction between subject and experimenter via video during fMRI data collection. In each trial, participants either followed the experimenter's gaze to a target (RJA) or cued the experimenter to look at the target (IJA). A control condition, solo attention (SA), was included in which the subject shifted gaze to a target while the experimenter closed her eyes. Block and event-related analyses were conducted and revealed common and distinct regions for IJA and RJA. Distinct regions included the ventromedial prefrontal cortex for RJA and intraparietal sulcus and middle frontal gyrus for IJA (as compared to SA). Conjunction analyses revealed overlap in the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dMPFC) and right posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) for IJA and RJA (as compared to SA) for the event analyses. Functional connectivity analyses during a resting baseline suggest joint attention processes recruit distinct but interacting networks, including social-cognitive, voluntary attention orienting, and visual networks. This novel experimental set-up allowed for the identification of the neural bases of joint attention during a real-time interaction and findings suggest that whether one is the initiator or responder, the dMPFC and right pSTS, are selectively recruited during periods of joint attention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00169

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous task-based studies in infants using PET or EEG indicated that IJA may be supported by prefrontal areas, while adult fMRI and eye-tracking studies implicated a distributed set of regions throughout prefrontal, temporal, and parietal cortices.

    “Previous foundational task-based studies in infants using positron emission tomography (PET) (Caplan et al. 1993) or electroencephalography (EEG) (Mundy et al. 2000; Henderson et al. 2002), indicated that IJA may be supported by prefrontal areas, while groundbreaking studies in adults using novel fMRI and eye tracking paradigms (Redcay et al. 2012; Caruana et al. 2015) implicated a distributed set”

    From Joint attention and brain functional connectivity in infants and toddlers (2017) · cites this paper as Redcay et al. 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 124

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Charman T. (2000). “Theory of mind and the early diagnosis of autism,” in Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Autism and Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2nd Edn eds Baron-Cohen S. Tager-Flusberg H. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 422– 441
  2. Frischen A. Bayliss A. P. Tipper S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: social cognition, visual attention, and individual differences. Psychol. Bull. 133, 694– 724 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694 17592962 PMC1950440 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Redcay E. Saxe R. (in press). “Do you see what I see? The neural bases of joint attention,” in Agency and Joint Attention, eds Terrace H. S. Metacalfe J. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).
  4. Smith S. M. (2002). Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 17, 143– 155 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.066 12391568 PMC6871816 · DOI

Authors
Redcay, E., Kleiner, M., & Saxe, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Redcay, Elizabeth
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2012
Volume
6
Pages
169-169
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056596588
Cited by
124
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Frontiers Research Foundation
Funders
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
joint attention, neural correlates, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, posterior superior temporal sulcus, intraparietal sulcus, gaze following, social interaction, functional connectivity, social cognition, attentional orienting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review