Cited by 29Pain Management and TreatmentTactile and Sensory InteractionsStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plasticity in the Visual System is Associated with Prosthesis Use in Phantom Limb Pain

Open access

Abstract

The experience of strong phantom limb pain (PLP) in arm amputees was previously shown to be associated with structural neural plasticity in parts of the cortex that belong to dorsal and ventral visual streams. It has been speculated that this plasticity results from the extensive use of a functional prosthesis which is associated with increased visual feedback to control the artificial hand. To test this hypothesis, we reanalyzed data of cortical volumes of 21 upper limb amputees and tested the association between the amount of use of the hand prosthesis and cortical volume plasticity. On the behavioral level, we found no relation between PLP and the amount of prosthesis use for the whole patient group. However, by subdividing the patient group into patients with strong PLP and those with low to medium PLP, stronger pain was significantly associated with less prosthesis use whereas the group with low PLP did not show such an association. Most plasticity of cortical volume was identified within the dorsal stream. The more the patients that suffered from strong PLP used their prosthesis, the smaller was the volume of their posterior parietal cortex. Our data indicate a relationship between prosthesis use and cortical plasticity of the visual stream. This plasticity might present a brain adaptation process to new movement and coordination patterns needed to guide an artificial hand.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00311

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Atkins D. J. Heard D. C. Y. Donovan W. H. (1996). Epidemiologic overview of lndividuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities. J. Prosthet. Orthot. 8, 2– 11 10.1097/00008526-199601000-00003 · DOI
  2. Bekrater-Bodmann R. Foell J. Diers M. Flor H. (2012). The perceptual and neuronal stability of the rubber hand illusion across contexts and over time. Brain Res. 1452, 130– 139 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.001 22459041 · DOI
  3. Biddiss E. A. Chau T. T. (2007). Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 31, 236– 257 10.1080/03093640600994581 17979010 · DOI
  4. Botvinick M. Cohen J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 756 10.1038/35784 9486643 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Castiello U. Begliomini C. (2008). The cortical control of visually guided grasping. Neuroscientist 14, 157– 170 10.1177/1073858407312080 18219055 · DOI
  6. Cavina-Pratesi C. Monaco S. Fattori P. Galletti C. Mcadam T. D. Quinlan D. J. (2010). Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals the neural substrates of arm transport and grip formation in reach-to-grasp actions in humans. J. Neurosci. 30, 10306– 10323 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2023-10.2010 20685975 PMC6634677 · DOI
  7. Dale A. Fischl B. Sereno M. I. (1999). Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9, 179– 194 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 9931268 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dale A. M. Sereno M. I. (1993). Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5, 162– 176 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.162 23972151 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Desikan R. S. Segonne F. Fischl B. Quinn B. T. Dickerson B. C. Blacker D. (2006). An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 31, 968– 980 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 16530430 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Diers M. Christmann C. Koeppe C. Ruf M. Flor H. (2010). Mirrored, imagined and executed movements differentially activate sensorimotor cortex in amputees with and without phantom limb pain. Pain 149, 296– 304 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.020 20359825 · DOI
  11. Dietrich C. Walter-Walsh K. Preissler S. Hofmann G. O. Witte O. W. Miltner W. H. (2012). Sensory feedback prosthesis reduces phantom limb pain: proof of a principle. Neurosci. Lett. 507, 97– 100 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.10.068 22085692 · DOI
  12. Draganski B. Moser T. Lummel N. Gänssbauer S. Bogdahn U. Haas F. (2006). Decrease of thalamic gray matter following limb amputation. Neuroimage 31, 951– 957 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.018 16520065 · DOI
  13. Ephraim P. L. Wegener S. T. Mackenzie E. J. Dillingham T. R. Pezzin L. E. (2005). Phantom pain, residual limb pain, and back pain in amputees: results of a national survey. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86, 1910– 1919 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.031 16213230 · DOI
  14. Fischl B. Dale A. M. (2000). Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 11050– 11055 10.1073/pnas.200033797 10984517 PMC27146 · DOI
  15. Fischl B. Liu A. Dale A. M. (2001). Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans Medical Imaging 20, 70– 80 10.1109/42.906426 11293693 · DOI
  16. Fischl B. Salat D. H. Busa E. Albert M. Dieterich M. Haselgrove C. (2002). Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33, 341– 355 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00569-X 11832223 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Fischl B. Salat D. H. Van Der Kouwe A. J. W. Makris N. Segonne F. Quinn B. T. (2004). Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage 23, S69– S84 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.016 15501102 · DOI
  18. Fischl B. Sereno M. I. Dale A. (1999a). Cortical Surface-based analysis: II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 9, 195– 207 10.1006/nimg.1998.0396 9931269 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Fischl B. Sereno M. I. Tootell R. B. H. Dale A. M. (1999b). High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8, 272– 284 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<272::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-4 10619420 PMC6873338 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Flor H. (2002). Phantom limb pain: characteristics, causes, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 1, 182– 189 10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00074-1 12849487 · DOI
  21. Flor H. Elbert T. Knecht S. Wienbruch C. Pantev C. Birbaumer N. (1995). Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 375, 482– 484 10.1038/375482a0 7777055 · DOI
  22. Flor H. Nikolajsen L. Jensen T. S. (2006). Phantom limb pain: a case of maladaptive CNS plasticity? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 873– 881 10.1038/nrn1991 17053811 · DOI
  23. Flor H. Rudy T. E. Birbaumer N. Streit B. Schugens M. M. (1990). The applicability of the West Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory in German-speaking countries. Data on the reliability and validity of the MPI-D. Schmerz 4, 82– 87 10.1007/BF02527839 18415223 · DOI
  24. Giummarra M. J. Gibson S. J. Georgiou-Karistianis N. Bradshaw J. L. (2007). Central mechanisms in phantom limb perception: the past, present and future. Brain Res. Rev. 54, 219– 231 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.01.009 17500095 · DOI
  25. Grosbras M. H. Lobel E. Van De Moortele P. F. Lebihan D. Berthoz A. (1999). An anatomical landmark for the supplementary eye fields in human revealed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb. Cortex 9, 705– 711 10.1093/cercor/9.7.705 10554993 · DOI
  26. Hahn B. Ross T. J. Stein E. A. (2006). Neuroanatomical dissociation between bottom-up and top-down processes of visuospatial selective attention. Neuroimage 32, 842– 853 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.177 16757180 PMC2652125 · DOI
  27. Jensen M. P. Smith D. G. Ehde D. M. Robinsin L. R. (2001). Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain. Pain 91, 317– 322 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00459-0 11275389 · DOI
  28. Jensen T. S. Krebs B. Nielsen J. Rasmussen P. (1985). Immediate and long-term phantom limb pain in amputees: incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to pre-amputation limb pain. Pain 21, 267– 278 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90090-9 3991231 · DOI
  29. Johnson S. Hall J. Barnett S. Draper M. Derbyshire G. Haynes L. (2012). Using graded motor imagery for complex regional pain syndrome in clinical practice: failure to improve pain. Eur. J. Pain 16, 550– 561 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00064.x 22337591 · DOI
  30. Katz J. Melzack R. (1990). Pain memories in phantom limbs – review and clinical observations. Pain 43, 319– 336 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90029-D 2293143 · DOI
  31. Lieberman M. D. Cunningham W. A. (2009). Type I and type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 4, 423– 428 10.1093/scan/nsp052 20035017 PMC2799956 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Lotze M. Flor H. Grodd W. Larbig W. Birbaumer N. (2001). Phantom movements and pain – an MRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain 124, 2268– 2277 10.1093/brain/124.11.2268 11673327 · DOI
  33. Lotze M. Grodd W. Birbaumer N. Erb M. Huse E. Flor H. (1999). Does use of a myoelectric prosthesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain? Nat. Neurosci. 2, 501– 502 10.1038/9145 10448212 · DOI
  34. Makin T. R. Scholz J. Filippini N. Henderson Slater D. Tracey I. Johansen-Berg H. (2013). Phantom pain is associated with preserved structure and function in the former hand area. Nat Commun 4, 1570 10.1038/ncomms2571 23463013 PMC3615341 · DOI
  35. Merzenich M. M. Nelson R. J. Stryker M. P. Cynader M. S. Schoppmann A. Zook J. M. (1984). Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 224, 591– 605 10.1002/cne.902240408 6725633 · DOI
  36. Moseley G. L. (2006). Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain – a randomized controlled trial. Neurology 67, 2129– 2134 10.1212/01.wnl.0000249112.56935.32 17082465 · DOI
  37. Pons T. P. Garraghty P. E. Ommaya A. K. Kaas J. H. Taub E. Mishkin M. (1991). Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques. Science 252, 1857– 1860 10.1126/science.1843843 1843843 · DOI
  38. Preissler S. Feiler J. Dietrich C. Hofmann G. O. Miltner W. H. Weiss T. (2013). Gray matter changes following limb amputation with high and low intensities of phantom limb pain. Cereb. Cortex 23, 1038– 1048 10.1093/cercor/bhs063 22510531 · DOI
  39. Raichle K. A. Hanley M. A. Molton I. Kadel N. J. Campbell K. Phelps E. (2008). Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 45, 961– 972 10.1682/JRRD.2007.09.0151 19165686 PMC2743731 · DOI
  40. Ramachandran V. S. Altschuler E. L. (2009). The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain 132, 1693– 1710 10.1093/brain/awp135 19506071 · DOI
  41. Ramachandran V. S. Hirstein W. (1998). The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain 121, 1603– 1630 10.1093/brain/121.9.1603 9762952 · DOI
  42. Ramachandran V. S. Levi L. Stone L. Rogers-Ramachandran D. Llinãs R. R. Churchland P. S. (1996). “Illusions of body image: what they reveal about human nature,” in The Mind-Brain Continuum: Sensory Processes, eds Llinas R. R. Churchland P. S. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), 29– 60
  43. Ramakonar H. Franz E. A. Lind C. R. (2011). The rubber hand illusion and its application to clinical neuroscience. J. Clin. Neurosci. 18, 1596– 1601 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.05.008 22000838 · DOI
  44. Reuter M. Rosas H. D. Fischl B. (2010). Highly accurate inverse consistent registration: a robust approach. Neuroimage 53, 1181– 1196 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.020 20637289 PMC2946852 · DOI
  45. Roelfsema P. R. (2006). Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29, 203– 227 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112939 16776584 · DOI
  46. Schiltz C. Bodart J. M. Dubois S. Dejardin S. Michel C. Roucoux A. (1999). Neuronal mechanisms of perceptual learning: changes in human brain activity with training in orientation discrimination. Neuroimage 9, 46– 62 10.1006/nimg.1998.0394 9918727 · DOI
  47. Scott J. Huskisson E. C. (1976). Graphic representation of pain. Pain 2, 175– 184 10.1016/0304-3959(76)90113-5 1026900 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Segonne F. Dale A. M. Busa E. Glessner M. Salat D. Hahn H. K. (2004). A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. Neuroimage 22, 1060– 1075 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.032 15219578 · DOI
  49. Segonne F. Pacheco J. Fischl B. (2007). Geometrically accurate topology-correction of cortical surfaces using nonseparating loops. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26, 518– 529 10.1109/TMI.2006.887364 17427739 · DOI
  50. Sherman R. A. (1997). Phantom Pain. New York: Plenum Press
  51. Sled J. G. Zijdenbos A. P. Evans A. C. (1998). A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17, 87– 97 10.1109/42.668698 9617910 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Weiss T. Miltner W. H. Adler T. Bruckner L. Taub E. (1999). Decrease in phantom limb pain associated with prosthesis-induced increased use of an amputation stump in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 272, 131– 134 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00595-9 10507559 · DOI
  53. Weiss T. Miltner W. H. R. Dillmann S. Meissner W. Huonker R. Nowak H. (1998). Reorganization of the somatosensory cortex after amputation of the index finger. Neuro Report 9, 213– 216 9507957
  54. Weiss T. Miltner W. H. R. Huonker R. Friedel R. Schmidt I. Taub E. (2000). Rapid functional plasticity of the somatosensory cortex after finger amputation. Exp. Brain Res. 134, 199– 203 10.1007/s002210000456 11037286 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Preißler, S., Dietrich, C., Blume, K. R., Hofmann, G. O., Miltner, W. H. R., & Weiss, T.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • Jena University Hospital (DE)
Corresponding author
Preißler, Sandra
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
7
Pages
311-311
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126277682
Cited by
29
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (16SV3697)
  • Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
phantom limb pain, cortical plasticity, prosthesis use, upper limb amputation, dorsal stream, posterior parietal cortex, cortical volume, artificial hand, visual feedback, brain adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review