The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials
Open accessAbstract
ERPLAB toolbox is a freely available, open-source toolbox for processing and analyzing event-related potential (ERP) data in the MATLAB environment. ERPLAB is closely integrated with EEGLAB, a popular open-source toolbox that provides many EEG preprocessing steps and an excellent user interface design. ERPLAB adds to EEGLAB's EEG processing functions, providing additional tools for filtering, artifact detection, re-referencing, and sorting of events, among others. ERPLAB also provides robust tools for averaging EEG segments together to create averaged ERPs, for creating difference waves and other recombinations of ERP waveforms through algebraic expressions, for filtering and re-referencing the averaged ERPs, for plotting ERP waveforms and scalp maps, and for quantifying several types of amplitudes and latencies. ERPLAB's tools can be accessed either from an easy-to-learn graphical user interface or from MATLAB scripts, and a command history function makes it easy for users with no programming experience to write scripts. Consequently, ERPLAB provides both ease of use and virtually unlimited power and flexibility, making it appropriate for the analysis of both simple and complex ERP experiments. Several forms of documentation are available, including a detailed user's guide, a step-by-step tutorial, a scripting guide, and a set of video-based demonstrations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data
Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 · Cited by 8,496
Cited by
Brain-to-Brain Synchrony during Naturalistic Social Interactions
Kinreich, S., Djalovski, A., Kraus, L., Louzoun, Y., & Feldman, R. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17339-5 · Cited by 402
Gamma band activity and the P3 reflect post-perceptual processes, not visual awareness
Pitts, M. A., Padwal, J., Fennelly, D., Martínez, A., & Hillyard, S. A. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.024 · Cited by 229
ERP CORE: An open resource for human event-related potential research
Kappenman, E. S., Farrens, J. L., Zhang, W., Stewart, A. X., & Luck, S. J. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117465 · Cited by 223
Self-citationMusic training alters the course of adolescent auditory development
Tierney, A. T., Krizman, J., & Kraus, N. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1505114112 · Cited by 171
Progress toward openness, transparency, and reproducibility in cognitive neuroscience
Gilmore, R. O., Diaz, M. T., Wyble, B. A., & Yarkoni, T. (2017) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13325 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014-04-14
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 213-213
- ISSN
- 1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123163997
- Cited by
- 2,584
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 59.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213
- The paper
- Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.