Cited by 3Voice and Speech DisordersPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neurolinguistic and acoustic analysis of articulatory impairments in Arabic speech disorders

Open access
Algaraady, Jeehaan, Mahyoob, Mohammad, Khan, Mohammad Zubair·2025·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Background: Pharyngeal sounds, integral to Arabic phonetics, require precise vocal tract coordination, posing significant challenges for individuals with speech disorders. Objective: This study investigates the neurolinguistic and acoustic characteristics of pharyngeal sound production in Arabic speakers with speech impairments, aiming to elucidate the impact of neurological disruptions on articulatory precision. Methods: A comparative study was conducted with 20 participants (10 with speech disorders, 10 with typical speech). Acoustic analysis, including spectrographic evaluation, was used to quantify deviations in pharyngeal sound production. Concurrently, neurolinguistic assessments, which included neurological evaluations, identified disruptions in neural pathways governing speech motor control. Results: Individuals with speech disorders exhibited significant neuromotor deficits, correlating with distinct acoustic deviations in pharyngeal sound production. These findings highlight the synergy of neurolinguistic and acoustic approaches in identifying underlying mechanisms of speech impairment. Conclusion: By integrating neurolinguistic and acoustic analyses, this study establishes a novel framework for diagnosing and treating pharyngeal sound disorders in Arabic speakers. The results inform targeted therapeutic interventions and the development of assistive technologies, advancing clinical outcomes in speech-language pathology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1638363

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 The acoustic analysis of speech sound / ħ /, “/ ح /”.
Figure 1 The acoustic analysis of speech sound / ħ /, “/ ح /”.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 The Pitch, pulse, and voicing parameter variations across different conditions.
Figure 2 The Pitch, pulse, and voicing parameter variations across different conditions.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 The jitter, shimmer, and harmonicity parameters across the conditions of the sounds / ħ /.
Figure 3 The jitter, shimmer, and harmonicity parameters across the conditions of the sounds / ħ /.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 The acoustic analyses of the sound / ʕ /, “/ ع/”.
Figure 4 The acoustic analyses of the sound / ʕ /, “/ ع/”.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 The pitches, pulse, and voicing change in different conditions of the sound / ʕ /.
Figure 5 The pitches, pulse, and voicing change in different conditions of the sound / ʕ /.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 The jitter, shimmer, and harmonicity parameters across the conditions of the sounds of / ʕ /.
Figure 6 The jitter, shimmer, and harmonicity parameters across the conditions of the sounds of / ʕ /.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Speech parameters Heatmap across conditions.
Figure 7 Speech parameters Heatmap across conditions.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Alqudah, 2020, Arabic disordered speech phonetic dictionary generator for automatic speech recognition, J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., 98, 571
  2. Boersma, 2023, Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 6.3.08
  3. Roach, 2009, English phonetics and phonology paperback with audio CDs (2): A practical course

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Algaraady, J., Mahyoob, M., & Khan, M. Z.
Affiliations
  • Taiz University (YE)
  • Taibah University (SA)
Corresponding author
  • Algaraady, Jeehaan
  • Mahyoob, Mohammad
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2025-10-07
Volume
19
Pages
1638363-1638363
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414879916
Cited by
2
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
King Salman Center for Disability Research (KSRG-2024-141)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
speech motor control, neuromotor deficits, speech acoustics, spectrographic analysis, speech-language pathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review