Cited by 3Music Therapy and HealthUrban Green Space and HealthArt Therapy and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrating music and nature: a scoping review of research on interventions involving both music- and nature-based strategies for mental health and wellbeing

Open access
Hand, Michelle D., Ihara, Emily S., Moore, Morgan, Shaw, Madison·2025·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Introduction: Both music-related and nature-based therapeutic activities can enhance wellbeing, physical, social, emotional, and mental health, and recovery from posttraumatic stress. While music- and nature-based therapeutic approaches have been studied individually, research is limited on the holistic combination of music- and nature-based therapeutic interventions. Thus, a scoping review was conducted to chart primary research on the combined use of music- and nature-based therapeutic strategies and their effects on overall wellbeing, and within this scope, potentially on mental and behavioral health outcomes. Methods: Included were peer-reviewed articles reporting primary research findings on how (if at all) the combined use of both music and nature-based interventions impacted wellbeing and thus, mental and behavioral health. All studies had to be reported in English. Excluded were studies that did not involve both nature-based and music-related therapeutic activities, those not involving primary research, and articles without a clear discussion on potential impacts on wellbeing, mental, or behavioral health. After applying this inclusion and exclusion criteria, 884 potentially relevant peer-reviewed articles were identified, 23 of which were preliminarily screened in upon abstract and title review. After full text reading, eight of these articles were deemed eligible for the review and were thematically analyzed. Results: Four themes were identified from the reviewed studies: (a) music- and nature-based activities yield benefits across various aspects of wellbeing, (b) multiple activities can be combined and adapted for diverse contexts and populations, (c) more research is needed on the combined therapeutic use of music and nature, and (d) choice and expression should be prioritized, which music and nature can facilitate. The primary focus of the reviewed studies was on how music-based interventions in outdoor or natural settings can impact multiple aspects of wellbeing, particularly emotional wellbeing, and with this, improved mood. Discussion: The results suggest that combining music and nature-based therapeutic approaches can improve mental and behavioral health by enhancing multiple aspects of wellbeing. For example, music-making in natural settings can foster deep connections with nature and spiritual wellness. Implications for future research are provided, as further research is needed on the combined use of music- and nature-based therapeutic activities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1664304

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIGURE 1 Scoping review results (modified from PRISMA and Hengelaar et al., 2018).
FIGURE 1 Scoping review results (modified from PRISMA and Hengelaar et al., 2018).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Hand, 2020, Perceptions of Sexual Violence in Later Life: A Three Paper Dissertation Study.
  2. Kellert, 1993, Introduction, 18
  3. Montgomery, 2015, The theoretical and therapeutic paradigm of botanical arranging., J. Ther. Hortic., 25, 16
  4. Ruzany, 2022, Embodied Digital Storytelling with Ancestral Legacy.
  5. Ulrich, 1993, Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes, 73
  6. 2022, COVID-19 Pandemic Triggers 25% Increase in Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression Worldwide.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hand, M. D., Ihara, E. S., Moore, M., & Shaw, M.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Corresponding author
Hand, Michelle D.
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2025-08-26
Volume
19
Pages
1664304-1664304
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413696614
Cited by
3
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
music therapy, nature-based interventions, well-being, mental health, emotional well-being, mood, spiritual health, behavioral health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review