Combining collation and annotation efforts toward completion of the rat and mouse connectomes in BAMS
Open accessAbstract
Many different independently published neuroanatomical parcellation schemes (brain maps, nomenclatures, or atlases) can exist for a particular species, although one scheme (a standard scheme) is typically chosen for mapping neuroanatomical data in a particular study. This is problematic for building connection matrices (connectomes) because the terms used to name structures in different parcellation schemes differ widely and interrelationships are seldom defined. Therefore, data sets cannot be compared across studies that have been mapped on different neuroanatomical atlases without a reliable translation method. Because resliceable 3D brain models for relating systematically and topographically different parcellation schemes are still in the first phases of development, it is necessary to rely on qualitative comparisons between regions and tracts that are either inserted directly by neuroanatomists or trained annotators, or are extracted or inferred by collators from the available literature. To address these challenges, we developed a publicly available neuroinformatics system, the Brain Architecture Knowledge Management System (BAMS; http://brancusi.usc.edu/bkms). The structure and functionality of BAMS is briefly reviewed here, as an exemplar for constructing interrelated connectomes at different levels of the mammalian central nervous system organization. Next, the latest version of BAMS rat macroconnectome is presented because it is significantly more populated with the number of inserted connectivity reports exceeding a benchmark value (50,000), and because it is based on a different classification scheme. Finally, we discuss a general methodology and strategy for producing global connection matrices, starting with rigorous mapping of data, then inserting and annotating it, and ending with online generation of large-scale connection matrices.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our knowledge of whole-brain connectivity is fragmented, without a cohesive and comprehensive understanding in any single vertebrate animal species.
“Thus, our knowledge of whole-brain connectivity is fragmented, without a cohesive and comprehensive understanding in any single vertebrate animal species (see for example the BAMS database for the rat brain6).”
From A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain (2014) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 52
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sharma J. (1986). Integrated spatial reasoning in geographic infomation systems: continuing topology and direction. University of Maine, PhD Thesis
- Authors
- Bota, M., Dong, H.-W., & Swanson, L. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bota, Mihail
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 2-2
- ISSN
- 1662-5196 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3289393
- OpenAlex
- W1999185738
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neuroinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (NS050792)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH083180, R01MH094360)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R56NS050792, R01NS050792)
- National Center for Research Resources (P41RR013642)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
- Keywords
- connectome, collation, annotation, connection matrix, neuroanatomical mapping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review