Why and how physical activity promotes experience-induced brain plasticity.
Open accessAbstract
Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is an unusual case of brain plasticity, since new neurons (and not just neurites and synapses) are added to the network in an activity-dependent way. At the behavioral level the plasticity-inducing stimuli include both physical and cognitive activity. In reductionistic animal studies these types of activity can be studied separately in paradigms like voluntary wheel running and environmental enrichment. In both of these, adult neurogenesis is increased but the net effect is primarily due to different mechanisms at the cellular level. Locomotion appears to stimulate the precursor cells, from which adult neurogenesis originates, to increased proliferation and maintenance over time, whereas environmental enrichment, as well as learning, predominantly promotes survival of immature neurons, that is the progeny of the proliferating precursor cells. Surprisingly, these effects are additive: boosting the potential for adult neurogenesis by physical activity increases the recruitment of cells following cognitive stimulation in an enriched environment. Why is that? We argue that locomotion actually serves as an intrinsic feedback mechanism, signaling to the brain, including its neural precursor cells, increasing the likelihood of cognitive challenges. In the wild (other than in front of a TV), no separation of physical and cognitive activity occurs. Physical activity might thus be much more than a generally healthy garnish to leading "an active life" but an evolutionarily fundamental aspect of "activity," which is needed to provide the brain and its systems of plastic adaptation with the appropriate regulatory input and feedback.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aerobic exercise increases the rate of hippocampal neurogenesis, including both the rate of cell proliferation and the survival of newborn granule cells.
“AE increases the rate of hippocampal neurogenesis, i.e., both the rate of cell proliferation as well as the survival of newborn granule cells (Cotman et al., 2007; Kempermann et al., 2010; Lucassen et al., 2010; Vivar et al., 2013) and despite being difficult to study in humans (Manganas et al., 2007; Ho et al., 2013; Jessberger and Gage, 2014), AE may also stimulate cell proliferation and DG”
From Aerobic Exercise as a Tool to Improve Hippocampal Plasticity and Function in Humans: Practical Implications for Mental Health Treatment (2016) · cites this paper as Kempermann et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 89 · Cited by 334
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bennett E. L. (1976). “Cerebral effects of differential experience and training,” in Neural Mechanisms of Learning and Memory, eds Rosenzweig M. R. Bennett E. L. (Cambridge: MIT Press), 279– 287
- Greenough W. T. (1976). “Enduring brain effects of differential experience and training,” in Neural Mechanisms of Learning and Memory, eds Rosenzweig M. R. Bennett E. L. (Cambridge: MIT Press), 255– 278
- Authors
- Kempermann, G., Fabel, K., Ehninger, D., Babu, H., Leal-Galicia, P., Garthe, A., & Wolf, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (DE)
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Kempermann, Gerd
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 189-189
- ISSN
- 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
- 1662-4548
- PMC
- PMC3000002
- OpenAlex
- W2007381301
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 5.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DZNE Pub (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
- Volkswagen Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- adult hippocampal neurogenesis, physical activity, locomotion, environmental enrichment, cognitive activity, neural progenitor cells, neuronal proliferation, neuronal survival, experience-dependent plasticity, wheel running, learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review