Cited by 112Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The role of cerebellar circuitry alterations in the pathophysiology of autism spectrum disorders

Open access
Mosconi, Matthew W., Wang, Zheng, Schmitt, Lauren M., Tsai, Peter, Sweeney, John A.·2015·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

The cerebellum has been repeatedly implicated in gene expression, rodent model and post-mortem studies of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). How cellular and molecular anomalies of the cerebellum relate to clinical manifestations of ASD remains unclear. Separate circuits of the cerebellum control different sensorimotor behaviors, such as maintaining balance, walking, making eye movements, reaching, and grasping. Each of these behaviors has been found to be impaired in ASD, suggesting that multiple distinct circuits of the cerebellum may be involved in the pathogenesis of patients' sensorimotor impairments. We will review evidence that the development of these circuits is disrupted in individuals with ASD and that their study may help elucidate the pathophysiology of sensorimotor deficits and core symptoms of the disorder. Preclinical studies of monogenetic conditions associated with ASD also have identified selective defects of the cerebellum and documented behavioral rescues when the cerebellum is targeted. Based on these findings, we propose that cerebellar circuits may prove to be promising targets for therapeutic development aimed at rescuing sensorimotor and other clinical symptoms of different forms of ASD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2015.00296

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 345 · Cited by 112

Authors
Mosconi, M. W., Wang, Z., Schmitt, L. M., Tsai, P., & Sweeney, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Mosconi, Matthew W.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2015-09-01
Volume
9
Pages
296-296
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1835606726
Cited by
112
References
345
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • KU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIMH (092696)
  • NINDS (083733)
  • NICHD (055751)
  • Autism Speaks (4853)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, cerebellum, cerebellar circuits, sensorimotor deficits, cerebellar development, postmortem studies, rodent models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review