The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EEG Recorded from the Ear: Characterizing the Ear-EEG Method
Open accessAbstract
Highlights Auditory middle and late latency responses can be recorded reliably from ear-EEG.For sources close to the ear, ear-EEG has the same signal-to-noise-ratio as scalp.Ear-EEG is an excellent match for power spectrum-based analysis. A method for measuring electroencephalograms (EEG) from the outer ear, so-called ear-EEG, has recently been proposed. The method could potentially enable robust recording of EEG in natural environments. The objective of this study was to substantiate the ear-EEG method by using a larger population of subjects and several paradigms. For rigor, we considered simultaneous scalp and ear-EEG recordings with common reference. More precisely, 32 conventional scalp electrodes and 12 ear electrodes allowed a thorough comparison between conventional and ear electrodes, testing several different placements of references. The paradigms probed auditory onset response, mismatch negativity, auditory steady-state response and alpha power attenuation. By comparing event related potential (ERP) waveforms from the mismatch response paradigm, the signal measured from the ear electrodes was found to reflect the same cortical activity as that from nearby scalp electrodes. It was also found that referencing the ear-EEG electrodes to another within-ear electrode affects the time-domain recorded waveform (relative to scalp recordings), but not the timing of individual components. It was furthermore found that auditory steady-state responses and alpha-band modulation were measured reliably with the ear-EEG modality. Finally, our findings showed that the auditory mismatch response was difficult to monitor with the ear-EEG. We conclude that ear-EEG yields similar performance as conventional EEG for spectrogram-based analysis, similar timing of ERP components, and equal signal strength for sources close to the ear. Ear-EEG can reliably measure activity from regions of the cortex which are located close to the ears, especially in paradigms employing frequency-domain analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
BOLD correlates of EEG topography reveal rapid resting-state network dynamics
Britz, J., Van De Ville, D., & Michel, C. M. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.052 · Cited by 1,070
An ensemble system for automatic sleep stage classification using single channel EEG signal
Koley, B., & Dey, D. (2012) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.09.012 · Cited by 291
Cited by
Phan, H., Andreotti, F., Cooray, N., Chen, O. Y., & De Vos, M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2019.2896659 · Cited by 623
Arnal, P. J., Thorey, V., Debellemaniere, E., Ballard, M. E., Bou Hernandez, A., Guillot, A., Jourde, H., Harris, M., Guillard, M., Van Beers, P., et al. (2020) · SLEEP · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaa097 · Cited by 394
A survey on deep learning-based non-invasive brain signals: recent advances and new frontiers
Zhang, X., Yao, L., Wang, X., Monaghan, J., McAlpine, D., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abc902 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Mikkelsen, K. B., Kappel, S. L., Mandic, D. P., & Kidmose, P.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2015-11-18
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 438-438
- ISSN
- 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150066253
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EEG Recorded from the Ear: Characterizing the Ear-EEG Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnins.2015.00438
- The paper
- Mikkelsen, K. B., Kappel, S. L., Mandic, D. P., & Kidmose, P. (2015). EEG Recorded from the Ear: Characterizing the Ear-EEG Method. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00438
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.