Increasing Our Insular World View: interoception and Psychopathology for Psychotherapists.
Open accessAbstract
Interoception has been determined to be an elemental aspect of the neural foundations of physiological homeostasis, subjective experience, and motivated behavior. This paper reviews current neuroscience research regarding interoception and forms of interoceptive dysfunction that may result in psychopathology, focusing on depression, and anxiety, in a manner conducive to psychotherapists engaging with it to consider clinical applications. Pertinent aspects of interoceptive system processes in relation to psychopathology are addressed: Functional interoceptive ability and the forms of its expression, the difficulty of accurate measurement of such within an individual or group, interoceptive inference processes and perturbations. Predictive coding, considered in this context as interoceptive inference, a process that integrates bottom-up and top down lines of neural information emerging from the multitude of bidirectional, anatomically hierarchical connections the insular cortex makes with other cortical, and subcortical structures, will be addressed regarding its place in psychopathological formulations. Clinical vignettes will elucidate how interoceptive disturbances might present in the therapeutic relationship, supporting the evaluation and application of scientific theory, and research findings by psychotherapists. The clinical implications of this neuroscientific research have received little attention in the psychotherapeutic setting. Increasing the knowledge base of psychotherapists and furthering awareness of the functional interactions of body and brain toward the creation of healthy and psychopathological experience benefits the patient. There is immediate need for the translational expression of scientific findings into the psychological evaluation of patients, therapeutic process, and treatment. While it may seem distant and unrelated to the affective processes that occur within the psychotherapeutic exchange, neuroscience adds a unique perspective from which to observe and live such experience for the therapist and patient. With the therapeutic relationship as the backdrop, a scientific perspective will support psychotherapists' comprehension of their patients' experience and the process of change, either through direct information, or the development of different perspectives from which to observe and interact with their patients. This paper will serve not only as a guide for psychotherapists concerning this expanding knowledge base, but also a source for neuroscience researchers intent on formulating research protocols that could produce clinical benefit.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mindfulness could promote the precision of afferent signals as a result of increased sensory attention, then increase perceptual inference processing of prediction errors in support of learning that can lead to adjustment of behaviors.
“mindfulness could promote the precision of afferent signals (Paulus et al., 2013; Duquette, 2017) as the result of increased sensory attention, then increase perceptual inference processing of prediction errors in support of learning that can lead to the adjustment of behaviors (Duquette, 2017).”
From Enhanced Resting-State Functional Connectivity With Decreased Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations of the Salience Network in Mindfulness Novices (2022) · cites this paper as Duquette, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 54
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Craig A. D. (Bud). (2008). Interoception and emotion: a neuroanatomical perspective, in Handbook of Emotions, 3rd Edn., eds Barrett L. F. Lewis M. Haviland-Jones J. M. (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 272– 290.
- Rolls E. T. (1999). The Brain and Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Solomon R. C. (2008). The philosophy of emotions, in Handbook of Emotions, 3rd Edn., eds Barrett L. F. Lewis M. Haviland-Jones J. M. (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 3– 16.
- Authors
- Duquette, P.
- Corresponding author
- Duquette, Patrice
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-03-21
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 135-135
- ISSN
- 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5359279
- OpenAlex
- W2602583719
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- interoception, insula, psychopathology, depression, anxiety, predictive coding, interoceptive inference, therapeutic relationship, brain-body interaction, psychotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review