Cited by 78Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Regionally Distinct Astrocytes Display Unique Transcription Factor Profiles in the Adult Brain

Open access
Lozzi, Brittney, Huang, Teng-Wei, Sardar, Debosmita, Huang, Anna Yu-Szu, Deneen, Benjamin·2020·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Astrocytes are the most abundant type of glial cell in the central nervous system and perform a myriad of vital functions, however, the nature of their diversity remains a longstanding question in neuroscience. Using transcription factor motif discovery analysis on region-specific gene signatures from astrocytes we uncovered universal and region-specific transcription factor expression profiles. This analysis revealed that motifs for Nuclear Factor-I (NFI) are present in genes enriched in astrocytes from all regions, with NFIB and NFIX exhibiting pan-astrocyte expression in the olfactory bulb, hippocampus, cortex, and brainstem. Further analysis into region-specific motif patterns, identified Nkx3-1, Stat4, Pgr, and Nkx6-1 as prospective region-specific transcription factors. Validation studies revealed that Nkx6-1 is exclusively expressed in astrocytes in the brainstem and associates with the promoters of several brainstem specific target genes. These studies illustrate the presence of multiple transcriptional layers in astrocytes across diverse brain regions and provide a new entry point for examining how astrocyte diversity is specified and maintained.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2020.00061

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 78

Authors
Lozzi, B., Huang, T.-W., Sardar, D., Huang, A. Y.-S., & Deneen, B.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Deneen, Benjamin
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2020-02-21
Volume
14
Pages
61-61
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006984592
Cited by
78
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
astrocytes, astrocyte heterogeneity, transcription factors, transcription factor binding motifs, regional gene expression, NFI, NFIB, NFIX, NKX6.1, NKX3.1, STAT4, PGR, brainstem, olfactory bulb, hippocampus, cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review