Cited by 31Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Astrocyte-Neuron Interactions during Learning May Occur by Lactate Signaling Rather than Metabolism

Open access
DiNuzzo, Mauro·2016·Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience

Abstract

OPINION article Front. Integr. Neurosci., 29 January 2016 Volume 10 - 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2016.00002

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnint.2016.00002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The metabolic responses to perceived, but not unperceived, sensory stimulation could be enabling factors for learning and memory.

    “As such, the metabolic responses to perceived, but not unperceived, sensory stimulation could be enabling factors for learning and memory”

    From Perception is associated with the brain’s metabolic response to sensory stimulation (2022) · cites this paper as DiNuzzo, 2016

    The paper’s main text links stimulation-induced increases in lactate and glycogen breakdown to learning and memory consolidation, supporting the proposed enabling role of metabolic responses. It does not distinguish metabolic responses to perceived from unperceived sensory stimulation; that contrast is unsupported by our copy. No page numbers are available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 31

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. MacNeilage P. (2010). The Origin of Speech. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Authors
DiNuzzo, M.
Affiliations
Centro Ricerche Enrico Fermi (IT)
Corresponding author
DiNuzzo, Mauro
Venue
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Published
2016-01-29
Volume
10
Pages
2-2
ISSN
1662-5145 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2266982677
Cited by
31
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
astrocyte-neuron interaction, lactate signaling, learning, astrocytes, lactate metabolism, brain energy metabolism, synaptic plasticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review