Bioactive Phenolic Compounds From Agri-Food Wastes: An Update on Green and Sustainable Extraction Methodologies
Open accessAbstract
Phenolic compounds are broadly represented in plant kingdom, and their occurrence in easily accessible low-cost sources like wastes from agri-food processing have led in the last decade to an increase of interest in their recovery and further exploitation. Indeed, most of these compounds are endowed with beneficial properties to human health (e.g., in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular diseases), that may be largely ascribed to their potent antioxidant and scavenging activity against reactive oxygen species generated in settings of oxidative stress and responsible for the onset of several inflammatory and degenerative diseases. Apart from their use as food supplements or as additives in functional foods, natural phenolic compounds have become increasingly attractive also from a technological point of view, due to their possible exploitation in materials science. Several extraction methodologies have been reported for the recovery of phenolic compounds from agri-food wastes mostly based on the use of organic solvents such as methanol, ethanol, or acetone. However, there is an increasing need for green and sustainable approaches leading to phenolic-rich extracts with low environmental impact. This review addresses the most promising and innovative methodologies for the recovery of functional phenolic compounds from waste materials that have appeared in the recent literature. In particular, extraction procedures based on the use of green technologies (supercritical fluid, microwaves, ultrasounds) as well as of green solvents such as deep eutectic solvents (DES) are surveyed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the case of polyphenolic compounds, the most effective method seems to be supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) with the use of deep eutectic solvents (DES) as emerging green solvents.
“However, in the case of polyphenolic compounds, the most effective method seems to be supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) with the use of deep eutectic solvents (DES) as emerging green solvents.”
From Use of Waste from the Food Industry and Applications of the Fermentation Process to Create Sustainable Cosmetic Products: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [83]
The Introduction lists SFE and DES as separate green approaches to recovering phenolic compounds, and the DES Extraction section describes DES as emerging green solvents. The SFE section gives ethanol—not DES—as an example of a co-solvent. The Conclusions say the choice of extraction method depends on the material and target compounds; they do not identify SFE with DES as the most effective method. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 256 · Cited by 448
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [5]Ayala-Zavala JF González-Aguilar G Siddiqui MW Plant Food byproducts: Industrial Relevance for Food Additives and Nutraceuticals. California, CA: Apple Academic Press (2018). p. 363.
- [74]Veggi PC Martinez J Meireles MAA Fundamentals of microwave extraction. In: Chemat F, Gravotto G. editors. Microwave-Assisted Extraction for Bioactive Compounds: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Springer (2013) p. 15– 52.
- Authors
- Panzella, L., Moccia, F., Nasti, R., Marzorati, S., Verotta, L., & Napolitano, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
- University of Milan (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Panzella, Lucia
- Venue
- Frontiers in Nutrition
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-05-07
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 60-60
- ISSN
- 2296-861X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7221145
- OpenAlex
- W3022271054
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 256
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- European Commission (2014‐2020, PON Ricerca e Innovazione 2014-2020)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
- Keywords
- phenolic compounds, agri-food waste, green extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction, deep eutectic solvents, antioxidant activity, reactive oxygen species, functional foods, dietary supplements, sustainable extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review