The effects of berberine supplementation on cardiovascular risk factors in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major concern today. Herbal medicine is one helping way to control CVD risks. One conclusive of herbal medicine is Berberine (BBR) and converse about it still exists, to clarify this issue, this meta-analysis was performed. PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for RCTs in adults on the effect of BBR supplementation on CVD risk factors up to July 2022. The pooled results showed BBR significantly reduced triglyceride (WMD = −23.70 mg/dl; 95%CI −30.16, −17.25; P < 0.001), total cholesterol (WMD = −20.64 mg/dl; 95%CI −23.65, −17.63; P < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein WMD = −9.63 mg/dl; 95%CI, −13.87, −5.39; P < 0.001), fasting blood glucose (FBG) (WMD = −7.74 mg/dl; 95%CI −10.79, −4.70; P < 0.001), insulin (WMD = −3.27 mg/dl; 95%CI −4.46,−2.07; P < 0.001), HbA1c (WMD = −0.45%; 95%CI −0.68, −0.23; P < 0.001), HOMA-IR (WMD = −1.04; 95%CI −1.55, −0.52; P < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (WMD = −5.46 mmHg; 95%CI −8.17, −2.76; P < 0.001), weight (WMD = −0.84; 95%CI −1.34,−0.34; P < 0.001), body mass index (WMD = −0.25 kg/m 2 ; 95%CI −0.46, −0.04; P = 0.020), while increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (WMD = 1.37 mg/dl; 95%CI 0.41,2.23; P = 0.005). The optimal dose of BBR was 1 g/day for TG, TC, and weight, 1.8 g/day for insulin and HOMA-IR, and 5 g/day for HDL. FBG's most efficient time frame was 40 weeks from the beginning of supplementation, whereas DBP and waist circumference was 50 weeks. In conclusion, the lipid profile, FBG balance, obesity parameters, and SBP were improved with BBR supplementation. Systematic review registration CRD42022347004.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The safety of berberine was not evaluated in the 2022 meta-analysis.
“and the safety of berberine was not evaluated.”
From Efficacy and safety of berberine on the components of metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials (2025) · cites this paper as Zamani et al., 2022
The Results section (‘Adverse effects’; page unavailable) evaluates safety by summarizing adverse effects reported in the included studies. It notes that some studies reported no significant adverse effects, while others reported mild to moderate gastrointestinal effects, contrary to the claim that safety was not evaluated. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA 2022 meta-analysis by Zamani et al. investigating the effects of berberine on adult cardiovascular risk factors included components of metabolic syndrome.
“A 2022 meta-analysis investigating the effects of berberine on adult cardiovascular risk factors included components of MetS (Zamani et al., 2022)”
From Efficacy and safety of berberine on the components of metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials (2025) · cites this paper as Zamani et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 122 · Cited by 28
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [26]Berven G Bye A Hals O Blankson H Fagertun H Thom E. Safety of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in overweight or obese human volunteers. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. (2000) 102: 455– 62. 10.1002/1438-9312(200008)102:7<455::AID-EJLT455>3.0.CO; 2-V · DOI
- [87]Berberine. Altern Med Rev. (2000) 5: 175– 7. 10767672
- Authors
- Zamani, M., Zarei, M., Nikbaf-Shandiz, M., Hosseini, S., Shiraseb, F., & Asbaghi, O.
- Affiliations
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences (IR)
- Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Shiraseb, Farideh
- Asbaghi, Omid
- Venue
- Frontiers in Nutrition
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2022-10-14
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 1013055-1013055
- ISSN
- 2296-861X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9614282
- OpenAlex
- W4306163966
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 122
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Berberine and alkaloids research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
- Keywords
- berberine, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular disease, triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, insulin, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, insulin resistance, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, weight, dose-response relationship, lipid profile, glycemic control, blood pressure, weight loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review