Cited by 70Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

Impacts of Activation of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway in Pancreatic Cancer

Open access
Furukawa, Toru·2015·Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is characterized by constitutive activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Mutations of KRAS or BRAF and epigenetic abrogation of DUSP6 contribute synergistically to the constitutive activation of MAPK. Active MAPK induces the expression of a variety of genes that are thought to play roles in malignant phenotypes of pancreatic cancer. By blocking the functions of such induced genes, it is possible to attenuate the malignant phenotypes. The development of drugs targeting genes downstream of MAPK may provide a novel therapeutic option for pancreatic cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fonc.2015.00023

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aurora kinase A is commonly overexpressed in pancreatic cancers and contributes to chromosomal instability and tumor progression.

    “The encoded protein Aurora kinase A is commonly overexpressed in pancreatic cancers, and contributes to both chromosomal instability through destabilization of the mitotic spindle assembly and towards tumor progression via phosphorylation of substrate proteins19,20.”
  • PDOs have emerged as a promising preclinical model for therapeutic prediction and functional studies across multiple cancer types, including in PDAC.

    “PDOs have emerged as a promising preclinical model for therapeutic prediction and functional studies across multiple cancer types, including in PDAC18,19,48–50.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 70

Authors
Furukawa, T.
Affiliations
Tokyo Women's Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Furukawa, Toru
Venue
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2015-02-04
Volume
5
Pages
23-23
ISSN
2234-943X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091843466
Cited by
70
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24659167)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, MAPK signaling, KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, DUSP6, epigenetic silencing, malignant phenotype, targeted therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review