Cited by 63

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Wheat Germ Agglutinin as a Potential Therapeutic Agent for Leukemia

Ryva, Bradley, Zhang, Keman, Asthana, Abhishek, Wong, Derek, Vicioso, Yorleny, Parameswaran, Reshmi·2019·Frontiers in Oncology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fonc.2019.00100

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Lectins demonstrate variable toxicities to cancer types. (A) Viable cell count of AML (OCI-AML3 and HL-60) cells treated with different dietary lectins as indicated. (B) Viable cell count of ALL (ALL-1 and ALL-2) cells treated with different dietary lectins as indicated. (C) Viable cell count of NHL (JVM2 and OCI-Ly10) cells treated with different dietary lectins as indicated. All seven lectins administered at 2 μg/mL for 24 h for all cell types. Un-labeled bars were non-significant compared to control. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ns > 0.05.
Figure 1 Lectins demonstrate variable toxicities to cancer types. (A) Viable cell count of AML (OCI-AML3 and HL-60) cells treated with different dietary lectins as indicated. (B) Viable cell count of ALL (ALL-1 and ALL-2) cells treated with different dietary lectins as indicated. (C) Viable cell count of NHL (JVM2 and OCI-Ly10) cells treated with different dietary lectins as indicated. All seven lectins administered at 2 μg/mL for 24 h for all cell types. Un-labeled bars were non-significant compared to control. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ns > 0.05.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 WGA binds and kills in a dose- and time-dependent manner. (A) OCI-AML3 cells treated with WGA-FITC (500 ng/mL) and analyzed for binding using flow cytometry. Binding to cells at 45 min (blue peak) and 24 h (red peak) compared to control (black peak). (B) OCI-Ly10 and HL-60 cells treated with WGA-FITC (500 ng/mL) for 30 min and analyzed for binding using flow cytometry. (C,D) Viable cell count and percent viability of HL-60 (C) and (D) OCI-AML3 with WGA treatment (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 μg/mL) for 1–4 days, counted using trypan blue. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2 WGA binds and kills in a dose- and time-dependent manner. (A) OCI-AML3 cells treated with WGA-FITC (500 ng/mL) and analyzed for binding using flow cytometry. Binding to cells at 45 min (blue peak) and 24 h (red peak) compared to control (black peak). (B) OCI-Ly10 and HL-60 cells treated with WGA-FITC (500 ng/mL) for 30 min and analyzed for binding using flow cytometry. (C,D) Viable cell count and percent viability of HL-60 (C) and (D) OCI-AML3 with WGA treatment (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 μg/mL) for 1–4 days, counted using trypan blue. ***p < 0.001.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 WGA is toxic to primary patient cells and kills AML cells without altering cell cycle. (A,B) Percent viability calculated using FSC/SSC live gating of primary AML patient cells belonging to different subtypes (A) M1&M5 (B) M4Eo; inv16 (1), AML with MDS related changes (2), M2 with MDS-related changes (3), M2(4), CEBPA;c-Kit;TET2(5), NPM1;IDH1(6), IDH1;DNMT3a;FLT3-TKD;trisomy8(7) all treated with or without 2 μg/mL WGA for 24 h. Control was standardized to one hundred percent. (C) Annexin V/Propidium Iodide staining of HL-60 cells treated with WGA (2.0 μg/mL) for 24 h. (D) Cell cycle analysis of gated live OCI-AML3 cells treated with WGA (2 μg/mL) for 24 h. (E) E-670 cell proliferation assays using OCI-AML-3 and HL-60 cell lines in media alone or in the presence of 2.5 μg/mL WGA for the indicated times. Proliferation of live cells was assessed via flow cytometry (Accuri 6C). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ns > 0.05.
Figure 3 WGA is toxic to primary patient cells and kills AML cells without altering cell cycle. (A,B) Percent viability calculated using FSC/SSC live gating of primary AML patient cells belonging to different subtypes (A) M1&M5 (B) M4Eo; inv16 (1), AML with MDS related changes (2), M2 with MDS-related changes (3), M2(4), CEBPA;c-Kit;TET2(5), NPM1;IDH1(6), IDH1;DNMT3a;FLT3-TKD;trisomy8(7) all treated with or without 2 μg/mL WGA for 24 h. Control was standardized to one hundred percent. (C) Annexin V/Propidium Iodide staining of HL-60 cells treated with WGA (2.0 μg/mL) for 24 h. (D) Cell cycle analysis of gated live OCI-AML3 cells treated with WGA (2 μg/mL) for 24 h. (E) E-670 cell proliferation assays using OCI-AML-3 and HL-60 cell lines in media alone or in the presence of 2.5 μg/mL WGA for the indicated times. Proliferation of live cells was assessed via flow cytometry (Accuri 6C). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ns > 0.05.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 WGA effect on AML is sialic acid dependent. (A) HL-60 cells treated with WGA-FITC (500 ng/mL) to analyze WGA binding using flow cytometry. Cells untreated with neuraminidase (red peak) were overlaid with cells treated with neuraminidase (50 mU/mL) for 6 h. (B) Percentage Propidium iodide positive HL-60 cells treated with WGA (4 μg/mL) for 4 h were analyzed with flow cytometry. HL-60 cells were either untreated or pre-treated with neuraminidase (50 mU/mL) for 2 h. (C) Viable cell count of OCI-AML3 cells treated with 2 μg/mL WGA, sWGA, LEL, and SNA for 24 h counted using trypan blue. (D) HL-60, OCI, and healthy human white blood cells (WBCs) treated with either 2 μg/mL WGA or with 2 μL PBS as a negative control and after 20 h treatment, cells were assessed at 10× magnification using bright field microscopy. Scale bar 100 μm shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ns > 0.05.
Figure 4 WGA effect on AML is sialic acid dependent. (A) HL-60 cells treated with WGA-FITC (500 ng/mL) to analyze WGA binding using flow cytometry. Cells untreated with neuraminidase (red peak) were overlaid with cells treated with neuraminidase (50 mU/mL) for 6 h. (B) Percentage Propidium iodide positive HL-60 cells treated with WGA (4 μg/mL) for 4 h were analyzed with flow cytometry. HL-60 cells were either untreated or pre-treated with neuraminidase (50 mU/mL) for 2 h. (C) Viable cell count of OCI-AML3 cells treated with 2 μg/mL WGA, sWGA, LEL, and SNA for 24 h counted using trypan blue. (D) HL-60, OCI, and healthy human white blood cells (WBCs) treated with either 2 μg/mL WGA or with 2 μL PBS as a negative control and after 20 h treatment, cells were assessed at 10× magnification using bright field microscopy. Scale bar 100 μm shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ns > 0.05.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 WGA treatment exhibits little or no toxicity toward normal cells in vitro. (A) Viable peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) treated with 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μg/mL WGA for 24 h were calculated by PI uptake using flow cytometry. (B) Light microscopy of OP9 stromal cells showing phenotype. Cells were treated with 2.0 μg/mL WGA for 24 h and imaged. Scale bar 400 mm shown. (C) Light microscopy of HEK293 cells showing phenotype. Cells were treated with 2.0 μg/mL WGA for 24 h and imaged. Scale bar 400 mm shown. (D) Hemagglutination assay on 96-well micro-plate of mouse and human blood using serial dilution of WGA (25 to 1.6 μg and 12.5 to 0.8 μg, respectively). Absence of lectin control (0.0 μg) for mouse and human blood are included. ns > 0.05.
Figure 5 WGA treatment exhibits little or no toxicity toward normal cells in vitro. (A) Viable peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) treated with 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μg/mL WGA for 24 h were calculated by PI uptake using flow cytometry. (B) Light microscopy of OP9 stromal cells showing phenotype. Cells were treated with 2.0 μg/mL WGA for 24 h and imaged. Scale bar 400 mm shown. (C) Light microscopy of HEK293 cells showing phenotype. Cells were treated with 2.0 μg/mL WGA for 24 h and imaged. Scale bar 400 mm shown. (D) Hemagglutination assay on 96-well micro-plate of mouse and human blood using serial dilution of WGA (25 to 1.6 μg and 12.5 to 0.8 μg, respectively). Absence of lectin control (0.0 μg) for mouse and human blood are included. ns > 0.05.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 WGA treatment demonstrated little toxicity to normal cells in vivo. (A) Treatment scheme where 2 mg/kg WGA was IP administered to two mice on days 1, 4, and 8. Mice were sacrificed on day 9. (B) Weights of mice treated with WGA during duration of treatment. (C) Histological analysis of WGA-treated tissues. Spleen, liver, and kidney stained with H&E and imaged by light microscopy at 10X magnification. Scale bar 400 μm shown (D) Histological analysis of Hematoxylin&Eosin stained brain tissues from PBS and WGA (5 mg/kg) injected mice. Scale bar 100 μm shown (E) HEMAVET blood toxicity analysis of treated mice after sacrifice compared to control mice and normal values. Normal values were given with HemaVet instructions. ns > 0.05.
Figure 6 WGA treatment demonstrated little toxicity to normal cells in vivo. (A) Treatment scheme where 2 mg/kg WGA was IP administered to two mice on days 1, 4, and 8. Mice were sacrificed on day 9. (B) Weights of mice treated with WGA during duration of treatment. (C) Histological analysis of WGA-treated tissues. Spleen, liver, and kidney stained with H&E and imaged by light microscopy at 10X magnification. Scale bar 400 μm shown (D) Histological analysis of Hematoxylin&Eosin stained brain tissues from PBS and WGA (5 mg/kg) injected mice. Scale bar 100 μm shown (E) HEMAVET blood toxicity analysis of treated mice after sacrifice compared to control mice and normal values. Normal values were given with HemaVet instructions. ns > 0.05.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 WGA induced AML cell killing in xenograft mouse model. (A) Treatment scheme- HL-60 cells injected at day 1 and at day 6, 8 and 10 WGA 5mg/kg injected intratumorally and mice were sacrificed at day 24. (B) Pictures of mice treated with PBS or WGA (C) Graph showing tumor volume (mm3) of PBS and WGA injected mice. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 7 WGA induced AML cell killing in xenograft mouse model. (A) Treatment scheme- HL-60 cells injected at day 1 and at day 6, 8 and 10 WGA 5mg/kg injected intratumorally and mice were sacrificed at day 24. (B) Pictures of mice treated with PBS or WGA (C) Graph showing tumor volume (mm3) of PBS and WGA injected mice. ***p < 0.001.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Sharon, 1972, Lectins: cell-agglutinating and sugar-specific proteins, Science, 177, 949, 10.1126/science.177.4053.949 · DOI
  2. Etzler, 1986, Distribution and function of plant lectins, 371, 10.1016/B978-0-12-449945-4.50011-7 · DOI
  3. Vandenborre, 2009, Natural products: plant lectins as important tools in controlling pest insects, Biorational Control of Arthropod Pests- Application and Resistance Management, 163, 10.1007/978-90-481-2316-2_7 · DOI
  4. Peumans, 1995, Lectins as plant defense proteins, Plant Physiol, 109, 347, 10.1104/pp.109.2.347 · DOI
  5. Fujimoto, 2014, Lectin structures: classification based on the 3-D structures, Methods Mol Biol, 1200, 579, 10.1007/978-1-4939-1292-6_46 · DOI
  6. Damme, 2010, Plant lectins: a composite of several distinct families of structurally and evolutionary related proteins with diverse biological roles, Critic Rev Plant Sci, 575, 10.1080/07352689891304276 · DOI
  7. Hubbard, 1986, Glycosylation of the T-cell antigen-specific receptor and its potential role in lectin-mediated cytotoxicity, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 83, 1852, 10.1073/pnas.83.6.1852 · DOI
  8. Haas, 1999, Dietary lectins can induce in vitro release of IL-4 and IL-13 from human basophils, Eur J Immunol., 29, 918, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199903)29:03<918::AID-IMMU918>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  9. Gong, 2017, Plant lectins activate the NLRP3 inflammasome to promote inflammatory disorders, J Immunol., 198, 2082, 10.4049/jimmunol.1600145 · DOI
  10. Ricci-Azevedo, 2017, Targeting and recognition of toll-like receptors by plant and pathogen lectins, Front Immunol, 8, 1820, 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01820 · DOI
  11. Goldstein, 1978, The lectins: carbohydrate-binding proteins of plants and animals, Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem., 35, 127, 10.1016/S0065-2318(08)60220-6 · DOI
  12. Pusztai, 1998, Assessment of lectin inactivation by heat and digestion, Methods Mol Med., 9, 505
  13. Kilpatrick, 1985, Tomato lectin resists digestion in the mammalian alimentary canal and binds to intestinal villi without deleterious effects, FEBS Lett, 185, 299, 10.1016/0014-5793(85)80927-3 · DOI
  14. Kim, 1993, Lectin-induced apoptosis of tumour cells, Glycobiology, 3, 447, 10.1093/glycob/3.5.447 · DOI
  15. Vasconcelos, 2004, Antinutritional properties of plant lectins, Toxicon, 44, 385, 10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.05.005 · DOI
  16. Eckhardt, 1982, Inhibition of Ehrlich ascites tumor cell growth by Griffonia simplicifolia I lectin in vivo, Cancer Res., 42, 2977
  17. Miyoshi, 2001, Apoptosis induction associated with cell cycle dysregulation by rice bran agglutinin, J Biochem., 130, 799, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003051 · DOI
  18. Lorea, 1997, In vitro characterization of lectin-induced alterations on the proliferative activity of three human melanoma cell lines, Melanoma Res., 7, 353, 10.1097/00008390-199710000-00001 · DOI
  19. Wang, 2000, Effects of lectins with different carbohydrate-binding specificities on hepatoma, choriocarcinoma, melanoma and osteosarcoma cell lines, Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 32, 365, 10.1016/S1357-2725(99)00130-2 · DOI
  20. Van Damme, 1998, Handbook of Plant Lectins: Properties and Biomedical Applications
  21. Dalla Pellegrina, 2005, Plant lectins as carriers for oral drugs: is wheat germ agglutinin a suitable candidate?, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 207, 170, 10.1016/j.taap.2005.01.001 · DOI
  22. Schwarz, 1998, Wheatgerm agglutinin-mediated toxicity in pancreatic cancer cells, Br J Cancer, 80, 1754, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690593 · DOI
  23. Gastman, 2004, A novel apoptotic pathway as defined by lectin cellular initiation, Biochem Biophys Res Commun., 316, 263, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.02.043 · DOI
  24. Tsai, 2017, Wheat germ agglutinin-induced paraptosis-like cell death and protective autophagy is mediated by autophagy-linked FYVE inhibition, Oncotarget, 8, 91209, 10.18632/oncotarget.20436 · DOI
  25. Brown, 2012, Leukaemias into the 21st century: part 1: the acute leukaemias, Intern Med J, 42, 1179, 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02938.x · DOI
  26. Puckett, 2017, Cancer, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Acute (ALL)
  27. Nogai, 2011, Pathogenesis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, J Clin Oncol, 29, 1803, 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.3252 · DOI
  28. Bennett, 1985, Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group, Ann Intern Med., 103, 620, 10.7326/0003-4819-103-4-620 · DOI
  29. Döhner, 2017, Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel, Blood, 129, 424, 10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196 · DOI
  30. Villegas, 1993, Transcytosis of protein through the mammalian cerebral epithelium and endothelium. II Adsorptive-transcytosis of WGA-HRP and the blood-brain and brain-blood barriers, J Neurocytol., 22, 67, 10.1007/BF01181571 · DOI
  31. Zhang, 2017, The essential role of YAP O-GlcNAcylation in high-glucose-stimulated liver tumorigenesis, Nat Commun., 8, 15280, 10.1038/ncomms15280 · DOI
  32. Fardini, 2013, O-GlcNAcylation: A New Cancer Hallmark?, Front Endocrinol, 4, 99, 10.3389/fendo.2013.00099 · DOI
  33. Shi, 2010, Aberrant O-GlcNAcylation characterizes chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Leukemia, 24, 1588, 10.1038/leu.2010.152 · DOI
  34. Asthana, 2018, Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway (HBP) inhibition leads to AML cell differentiation and cell death, Mol Cancer Ther., 17, 2226, 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0426 · DOI
  35. Bull, 2014, Sialic acids sweeten a tumor's life, Cancer Res., 74, 3199, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0728 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Van Buul, 2014, Health effects of wheat lectins: a review, J Cereal Sci, 59, 112, 10.1016/j.jcs.2014.01.010 · DOI
  37. Plattner, 2008, Targeted drug delivery: binding and uptake of plant lectins using human 5637 bladder cancer cells, Eur J Pharm Biopharm., 70, 572, 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.06.004 · DOI
  38. Wang, 2010, Wheat germ agglutinin-conjugated PLGA nanoparticles for enhanced intracellular delivery of paclitaxel to colon cancer cells, Int J Pharm., 400, 201, 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.08.023 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 63

Metadata

Authors
Ryva, B., Zhang, K., Asthana, A., Wong, D., Vicioso, Y., & Parameswaran, R.
Venue
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2019-02-21
Volume
9
ISSN
2234-943X
Cited by
63
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wheat Germ Agglutinin as a Potential Therapeutic Agent for Leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fonc.2019.00100
The paper
Ryva, B., Zhang, K., Asthana, A., Wong, D., Vicioso, Y., & Parameswaran, R. (2019). Wheat Germ Agglutinin as a Potential Therapeutic Agent for Leukemia. Frontiers in Oncology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00100