Multiple Sessions of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Reduced Craving and Relapses for Alcohol Use: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial in Alcohol Use Disorder
Open accessAbstract
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, has been studied as an adjunctive therapeutic agent for alcohol dependence. In a previous study, we showed that five consecutive sessions of tDCS applied bilaterally over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) reduced relapse to the use of alcohol in alcohol use disorder (AUD) outpatients. However, no changes on craving scores were observed. In the present study, we investigated if an extended number of sessions of the same intervention would reduce craving and relapses for alcohol use in AUD inpatients. Methods: Thus, a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, clinical trial with parallel arms was conducted (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02091284). AUD patients from two private and one public clinics for treatment of drug dependence were randomly allocated to two groups: real tDCS (5 x 7 cm2, 2 mA, for 20 minutes, cathodal over the left dlPFC and anodal over the right dlPFC) and sham-tDCS. Real or sham-tDCS was applied once a day, every other day, in a total of 10 sessions. Craving was monitored by a 5-item obsessive compulsive drinking scale once a week (one time before, three times during and once after brain stimulation) over about five weeks. Results: Craving scores progressively decreased over five measurements in both groups but were significantly reduced only in the real tDCS group after treatment. Corrected Hedges’ within-group (initial and final) effect sizes of craving scores were of 0.3 for the sham-tDCS and of 1.1 for the real tDCS group. Effect size was 3-fold larger in the real tDCS group. In addition, the between-group analysis on craving score difference was nearly significant, and the effect size was 0.58, in favor for a larger effect in the real tDCS group when compared to sham-tDCS. Furthermore, in a three-months follow-up after intervention, 72.2% of sham-tDCS group relapsed to the alcohol use whereas 72.7% of tDCS group were abstinent. Conclusions: Multiple sessions of bilateral prefrontal tDCS were well tolerated with no significant adverse events. Thus, extended repetitive bilateral tDCS over the dlPFC is a promising adjunctive clinical tool that could be used to reduce alcohol craving and relapses and facilitate alcoholism cessation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All 4 studies that used brain stimulation as an intervention were conducted in Brazil, an upper middle-income country.
“As a clear example, all 4 studies [36,44,59,60] that used brain stimulation as an intervention were conducted in Brazil, an upper middle-income country.”
From Patient-level interventions to reduce alcohol-related harms in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-summary (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
While 3 of the tDCS studies found a decrease in alcohol cravings compared to sham stimulation, one study found a lower relapse rate in the brain stimulation group but with no difference in alcohol cravings at 6-month follow-up.
“While 3 of these studies found a decrease in alcohol cravings compared to sham stimulation [36,44,60], one study found a lower relapse rate in the brain stimulation group but with no difference in alcohol cravings at 6-month follow-up [59].”
From Patient-level interventions to reduce alcohol-related harms in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-summary (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
Ultimately, 3 of the 4 tDCS studies found more relapses in the intervention group at 4-week, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up.
“Ultimately, 3 of the 4 studies in this group found more relapses in the intervention group at 4-week, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up [44,59,60].”
From Patient-level interventions to reduce alcohol-related harms in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-summary (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 80
- Authors
- Klauss, J., Anders, Q. S., Felippe, L. V., Nitsche, M. A., & Nakamura-Palacios, E. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
- BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Nakamura-Palacios, Ester M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-07-03
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 716-716
- ISSN
- 1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6037838
- OpenAlex
- W2808711942
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Frontiers in Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, alcoholism, alcohol craving, alcohol relapse, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, non-invasive brain stimulation, adjunctive therapy, alcohol abstinence, Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale, sham-controlled intervention, medication adherence, adverse events, relapse prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review