The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network Pharmacology Databases for Traditional Chinese Medicine: Review and Assessment
Open accessAbstract
The research field of systems biology has greatly advanced and, as a result, the concept of network pharmacology has been developed. This advancement, in turn, has shifted the paradigm from a "one-target, one-drug" mode to a "network-target, multiple-component-therapeutics" mode. Network pharmacology is more effective for establishing a "compound-protein/gene-disease" network and revealing the regulation principles of small molecules in a high-throughput manner. This approach makes it very powerful for the analysis of drug combinations, especially Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) preparations. In this work, we first summarized the databases and tools currently used for TCM research. Second, we focused on several representative applications of network pharmacology for TCM research, including studies on TCM compatibility, TCM target prediction, and TCM network toxicology research. Third, we compared the general statistics of several current TCM databases and evaluated and compared the search results of these databases based on 10 famous herbs. In summary, network pharmacology is a rational approach for TCM studies, and with the development of TCM research, powerful and comprehensive TCM databases have emerged but need further improvements. Additionally, given that several diseases could be treated by TCMs, with the mediation of gut microbiota, future studies should focus on both the microbiome and TCMs to better understand and treat microbiome-related diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Zhang, Y., Lin, Y., Zhao, H., Guo, Q., Chen, Y., & Lin, N. (2016) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.14151 · Cited by 23
RetractedCytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 · Cited by 51,888
STRING v10: protein–protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life
Szklarczyk, D., Franceschini, A., Wyder, S., Forslund, K., Heller, D., Huerta-Cepas, J., Simonovic, M., Roth, A., Santos, A., Tsafou, K. P., et al. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1003 · Cited by 10,436
TCMSP: a database of systems pharmacology for drug discovery from herbal medicines
Ru, J., Li, P., Wang, J., Zhou, W., Li, B., Huang, C., Li, P., Guo, Z., Tao, W., Yang, Y., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/1758-2946-6-13 · Cited by 5,038
Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery
Hopkins, A. L. (2008) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.118 · Cited by 4,622
ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery
Gaulton, A., Bellis, L. J., Bento, A. P., Chambers, J., Davies, M., Hersey, A., Light, Y., McGlinchey, S., Michalovich, D., Al-Lazikani, B., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr777 · Cited by 4,382
Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?
Kola, I., & Landis, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1470 · Cited by 4,167
DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration
Wishart, D. S. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj067 · Cited by 3,892
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders
Hamosh, A. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki033 · Cited by 3,420
A N EW A PPROACH TO D ECODING L IFE : Systems Biology
Ideker, T., Galitski, T., & Hood, L. (2001) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.2.1.343 · Cited by 1,664
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, R., Zhu, X., Bai, H., & Ning, K.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-02-21
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 123-123
- ISSN
- 1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2917075888
- Cited by
- 1,257
- References
- 89
- FWCI
- 88.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network Pharmacology Databases for Traditional Chinese Medicine: Review and Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fphar.2019.00123
- The paper
- Zhang, R., Zhu, X., Bai, H., & Ning, K. (2019). Network Pharmacology Databases for Traditional Chinese Medicine: Review and Assessment. Frontiers in Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.