Cited by 164Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPoisoning and overdose treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Metabolic Pathways and Potencies of New Fentanyl Analogs

Open access

Abstract

Up to now, little is known about the metabolic pathways of new fentanyl analogs that have recently emerged on the drug markets worldwide with high potential for producing addiction and severe adverse effects including coma and death. For some of the compound, limited information on the metabolism has been published, however, for others so far no information is available. Considering the well characterized metabolism of the pharmaceutically used opioid fentanyl and the so far available data, the metabolism of the new fentanyl analogs can be anticipated to generally involve reactions like hydrolysis, hydroxylation (and further oxidation steps), N- and O-dealkylation and O-methylation. Furthermore, phase II metabolic reactions can be expected comprising glucuronide or sulfate conjugate formation. When analyzing blood and urine samples of acute intoxication cases or fatalities, the presence of metabolites can be crucial for confirmation of the uptake of such compounds and further interpretation. Here we present a review on the metabolic profiles of new fentanyl analogs responsible for a growing number of severe and fatal intoxications in the United States, Europe, Canada, Australia, and Japan in the last years, as assessed by a systematic search of the scientific literature and official reports.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphar.2019.00238

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 102 · Cited by 164

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Andreasen, 2017, A fatal poisoning involving 2-fluorofentanyl, Proceedings of the 55th SOFT-TIAFT 2017 Annual Meeting
  2. 2017, N-(1-Phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-phenylcyclopropanecarboxamide, HCl Binding and Functional Activity at Delta, Kappa and Mu Opioid Receptors. In Vitro Receptor and Transporter Assays for Abuse Liability Testing for the DEA by the VA.
  3. 2016, N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-2-furancar-boxamide, mononhydrochloride Binding and Functional Activity at Delta, Kappa and Mu Opioid Receptors. In Vitro Receptor and Transporter Assays for Abuse Liability Testing for the DEA by the VA.
  4. 2017, Report on the Risk Assessment of N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-yl]-furan-2-Carboxamide (furanylfentanyl) in the Framework of the Council Decision on New Psychoactive Substances, Risk Assessments.
  5. EMCDDA–Europol Joint Report on a New Psychoactive Substance: 2-Methoxy-N-Phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl) Piperidin-4-yl]Acetamide (Methoxyacetylfentanyl), Joint Reports.
  6. Report on the Risk Assessment of N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-yl]Cyclopropanecarboxamide (cyclopropylfentanyl) in the Framework of the Council Decision on New Psychoactive Substances, Risk Assessments.
  7. Report on the Risk Assessment of N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-yl]oxolane-2-carboxamide (tetrahydrofuranylfentanyl; THF-F) in the framework of the Council Decision on new Psychoactive substances, Risk Assessments.
  8. 2016, Drug Facts Fentanyl. National Institutes of Health; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  9. Skulska, 2004, Fentanyl and its analogues in the forensic laboratory. Medical and analytical problems., Probl. Forensic. Sci., 59, 127
  10. 2017, Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimen.

Metadata

Authors
Wilde, M., Pichini, S., Pacifici, R., Tagliabracci, A., Busardò, F. P., Auwärter, V., & Solimini, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
Corresponding author
Busardò, Francesco Paolo
Venue
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2019-04-05
Volume
10
Pages
238-238
ISSN
1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2934721706
Cited by
164
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
European Commission (JUST-2017-AG-DRUG, 806996-JUSTSO)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
Keywords
fentanyl analogs, opioid metabolites, drug metabolism, hydroxylation, dealkylation, glucuronidation, sulfate conjugation, opioid toxicity, fatal poisoning, forensic toxicology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review