Cited by 250Psychedelics and Drug StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTreatment of Major Depression

Therapeutic alliance and rapport modulate responses to psilocybin assisted therapy for depression

Open access
Murphy, Roberta, Kettner, Hannes, Zeifman, Rick, Giribaldi, Bruna, Kartner, Laura, Martell, Jonny, Read, Tim, Murphy-Beiner, Ashleigh +5 more·2022·Frontiers in Pharmacology

Abstract

Background:Across psychotherapeutic frameworks, the strength of the therapeutic alliance has been found to correlate with treatment outcomes; however, its role has never been formally assessed in a trial of psychedelic-assisted therapy. We aimed to investigate the relationships between therapeutic alliance and rapport, the quality of the acute psychedelic experience and treatment outcomes. Methods:This 2-arm double-blind randomized controlled trial compared escitalopram with psychedelic-assisted therapy for moderate-severe depressive disorder (N= 59). This analysis focused on the psilocybin condition (n= 30), who received two oral doses of 25 mg psilocybin, 3-weeks apart, with psychological preparation, in-session support, and integration therapy. A new psychedelic therapy model, called “Accept-Connect-Embody” (ACE), was developed in this trial. The primary outcome was depression severity 6 weeks post treatment (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, QIDS-SR-16). Path analyses tested the hypothesis that therapeutic alliance (Scale To Assess the Therapeutic Relationship Patient Version, STAR-P) would predict depression outcomes via its influence on the acute psychedelic experience, specifically emotional-breakthrough (EBI) and mystical-type experiences (MEQ). The same analysis was performed on the escitalopram arm to test specificity. Results:The strength of therapeutic alliance predicted pre-session rapport, greater emotional-breakthrough and mystical-type experience (maximum EBI and MEQ scores across the two psilocybin sessions) and final QIDS scores (β= −0.22,R2= 0.42 for EBIMax;β= −0.19,R2= 0.32 for MEQMax). Exploratory path models revealed that final depression outcomes were more strongly affected by emotional breakthrough during the first, and mystical experience during the second session. Emotional breakthrough, but not mystical experience, during the first session had a positive effect on therapeutic alliance ahead of the second session (β= 0.79,p< 0.0001). Therapeutic alliance ahead of the second session had a direct impact on final depression scores, not mediated by the acute experience, with a weaker alliance ahead of the second psilocybin session predicting higher absolute depression scores at endpoint (β= −0.49,p< 0.001) Discussion:Future research could consider therapist training and characteristics; specific participant factors, e.g., attachment style or interpersonal trauma, which may underlie the quality of the therapeutic relationship, the psychedelic experience and clinical outcomes; and consider how therapeutic approaches might adapt in cases of weaker therapeutic alliance. Clinical Trial Registration:This trial is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov , identifier (NCT03429075).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphar.2021.788155

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integrating MDMA-AT with psychoanalytic principles may establish therapeutic relationship as corrective emotional experience, fostering meaningful psychological change in individuals with PN.

    “Integrating MDMA-AT with psychoanalytic principles may further establish the therapeutic relationship as a corrective emotional experience, fostering meaningful psychological change in individuals with PN (170, 171).”

    From Psychoanalytically informed MDMA-assisted therapy for pathological narcissism: a novel theoretical approach (2025) · cites this paper as [170]

    The Discussion’s “The Therapeutic Relationship” section proposes that experiencing care within psychedelic-assisted therapy may change implicit relational patterns and support therapeutic progress. That supports the proposed relationship-based mechanism, but the paper studies psilocybin-assisted therapy for depression; it does not establish this application to MDMA-assisted therapy integrated with psychoanalytic principles or to individuals with PN. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Therapist-patient relationship is one of the strongest predictors of treatment success across psychotherapeutic approaches, including PAT.

    “Studies indicate that the therapist-patient relationship is one of the strongest predictors of treatment success across psychotherapeutic approaches, including PAT (166, 169–171).”

    From Psychoanalytically informed MDMA-assisted therapy for pathological narcissism: a novel theoretical approach (2025) · cites this paper as [170]

    The Introduction (page not supplied) calls therapeutic alliance an important predictor of psychotherapy outcomes across approaches. The Discussion reports that alliance and rapport predicted outcomes in a psilocybin-assisted therapy trial for depression. The paper does not establish that the relationship is one of the strongest predictors across approaches. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Therapeutic relationship, alliance, or rapport variables can be assessed with various measures with established validity and reliability.

    “These variables can be assessed with various measures with established validity and reliability.89,90,93-95”

    From Best Practice Recommendations for Conducting and Reporting Controlled Trials in Clinical Hypnosis Research (2024) · cites this paper as [94]

    The Methods (Measures; page unavailable) describe two ways of assessing these variables: the STAR-P for therapeutic alliance and a self-constructed single-item rating for rapport. This supports the claim that they can be measured in different ways, but the paper does not establish the validity and reliability of both measures; in particular, it describes the rapport item as self-constructed. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 114 · Cited by 250

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Acock A. C. Oregon S. U. (2018). A Gentle Introduction to Stata. 6th ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press Publication, StataCorp LLC. Available at: https://www.stata-press.com/books/preview/acock6-preview.pdf.
  2. Awang Z. (2014). Research Methodology and Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Mara, UiTM Press.
  3. Fisher F. M. (2015). Therapy with Substance: Psycholytic Psychotherapy in the Twenty First century. London, United Kingdom: Muswell Hill Press.
  4. Walsh R. Grob C. S. (2005). Higher Wisdom: Eminent Elders Explore the Continuing Impact of Psychedelics (Suny Series in Transpersonal and Humanistic Psychology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  5. Watts R. (2021). Psilocybin for Depression: The ACE Model Manual. Open Science Framework, 10.31234/osf.io/5x2buWesten · DOI

Authors
Murphy, R., Kettner, H., Zeifman, R., Giribaldi, B., Kartner, L., Martell, J., Read, T., Murphy-Beiner, A., Baker-Jones, M., Nutt, D., Erritzoe, D., Watts, R., & Carhart-Harris, R.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Devon Partnership NHS Trust (GB)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Murphy, Roberta
Venue
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2022-03-31
Volume
12
Pages
788155-788155
ISSN
1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221001769
Cited by
250
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 1
FWCI
42.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Royal College of Psychiatrists
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2013-21-501, CL-2017-21-004)
  • Academy of Medical Sciences (SGL019\1063)
  • Imperial College London
  • King's College London
  • NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
alliances, therapeutic rapport, psilocybin-assisted therapy, depression, mystical experience, escitalopram, treatment outcome prediction, attachment styles, interpersonal trauma, therapist training, therapist characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review