The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in Fingerprint Analysis for Standardization and Quality Control of Herbal Medicines
Open accessAbstract
Herbal drugs or herbal medicines (HMs) have a long-standing history as natural remedies for preventing and curing diseases. HMs have garnered greater interest during the past decades due to their broad, synergistic actions on the physiological systems and relatively lower incidence of adverse events, compared to synthetic drugs. However, assuring reproducible quality, efficacy, and safety from herbal drugs remains a challenging task. HMs typically consist of many constituents whose presence and quantity may vary among different sources of materials. Fingerprint analysis has emerged as a very useful technique to assess the quality of herbal drug materials and formulations for establishing standardized herbal products. Rather than using a single or two marker(s), fingerprinting techniques take great consideration of the complexity of herbal drugs by evaluating the whole chemical profile and extracting a common pattern to be set as a criterion for assessing the individual material or formulation. In this review, we described and assessed various fingerprinting techniques reported to date, which are applicable to the standardization and quality control of HMs. We also evaluated the application of multivariate data analysis or chemometrics in assisting the analysis of the complex datasets from the determination of HMs. To ensure that these methods yield reliable results, we reviewed the validation status of the methods and provided perspectives on those. Finally, we concluded by highlighting major accomplishments and presenting a gap analysis between the existing techniques and what is needed to continue moving forward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments
Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 · Cited by 10,117
Quality Control of the Traditional Herbs and Herbal Products: A Review
Balekundri, A., & Mannur, V. (2020) · Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1186/s43094-020-00091-5 · Cited by 252
Wang, P., & Yu, Z. (2015) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2015.04.001 · Cited by 118
Hosbas Coskun, S., Wise, S. A., & Kuszak, A. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.786261 · Cited by 28
Cited by
Suzery, M., Nurauliya, A. H., Wibawa, P. J., Budiman, C., & Cahyono, B. (2026) · Natural Product Research · doi:10.1080/14786419.2026.2720787
Metadata
- Authors
- Noviana, E., Indrayanto, G., & Rohman, A.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2022-06-02
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 853023-853023
- ISSN
- 1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4281639938
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 27.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in Fingerprint Analysis for Standardization and Quality Control of Herbal Medicines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fphar.2022.853023
- The paper
- Noviana, E., Indrayanto, G., & Rohman, A. (2022). Advances in Fingerprint Analysis for Standardization and Quality Control of Herbal Medicines. Frontiers in Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.853023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.