The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Cardiac Activation Mapping
Open accessAbstract
A critical procedure in diagnosing atrial fibrillation is the creation of electro-anatomic activation maps. Current methods generate these mappings from interpolation using a few sparse data points recorded inside the atria; they neither include prior knowledge of the underlying physics nor uncertainty of these recordings. Here we propose a physics-informed neural network for cardiac activation mapping that accounts for the underlying wave propagation dynamics and we quantify the epistemic uncertainty associated with these predictions. These uncertainty estimates not only allow us to quantify the predictive error of the neural network, but also help to reduce it by judiciously selecting new informative measurement locations via active learning. We illustrate the potential of our approach using a synthetic benchmark problem and a personalized electrophysiology model of the left atrium. We show that our new method outperforms linear interpolation and Gaussian process regression for the benchmark problem and linear interpolation at clinical densities for the left atrium. In both cases, the active learning algorithm achieves lower error levels than random allocation. Our findings open the door towards physics-based electro-anatomic mapping with the ultimate goals to reduce procedural time and improve diagnostic predictability for patients affected by atrial fibrillation. Open source code is available at https://github.com/fsahli/EikonalNet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 · Cited by 20,384
Self-citationIndividual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
Cited by
Interpretable machine learning: Fundamental principles and 10 grand challenges
Rudin, C., Chen, C., Chen, Z., Huang, H., Semenova, L., & Zhong, C. (2022) · Statistics Surveys · doi:10.1214/21-ss133 · Cited by 958
Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems
Yu, J., Lu, L., Meng, X., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2022) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.114823 · Cited by 722
Machine Learning for Smart and Energy-Efficient Buildings
Das, H. P., Lin, Y.-W., Agwan, U., Spangher, L., Devonport, A., Yang, Y., Drgoňa, J., Chong, A., Schiavon, S., & Spanos, C. J. (2024) · Environmental Data Science · doi:10.1017/eds.2023.43 · Cited by 78
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sahli Costabal, F., Yang, Y., Perdikaris, P., Hurtado, D. E., & Kuhl, E.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Physics
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-02-28
- Volume
- 8
- ISSN
- 2296-424X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3008118574
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Cardiac Activation Mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fphy.2020.00042
- The paper
- Sahli Costabal, F., Yang, Y., Perdikaris, P., Hurtado, D. E., & Kuhl, E. (2020). Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Cardiac Activation Mapping. Frontiers in Physics. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.