Cited by 258Gut microbiota and healthBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Gut microbiome response to sucralose and its potential role in inducing liver inflammation in mice

Open access
Bian, Xiaoming, Chi, Liang, Gao, Bei, Tu, Pengcheng, Ru, Hongyu, Lu, Kun·2017·Frontiers in Physiology

Abstract

Sucralose is the most widely used artificial sweetener, and its health effects have been highly debated over the years. In particular, previous studies have shown that sucralose consumption can alter the gut microbiota. The gut microbiome plays a key role in processes related to host health, such as food digestion and fermentation, immune cell development, and enteric nervous system regulation. Inflammation is one of the most common effects associated with gut microbiome dysbiosis, which has been linked to a series of human diseases, such as diabetes and obesity. The aim of this study was to investigate the structural and functional effects of sucralose on the gut microbiota and associated inflammation in the host. In this study, C57BL/6 male mice received sucralose in their drinking water for 6 months. The difference in gut microbiota composition and metabolites between control and sucralose-treated mice was determined using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, functional gene enrichment analysis and metabolomics. Inflammatory gene expression in tissues was analyzed by RT-PCR. Alterations in bacterial genera showed that sucralose affects the gut microbiota and its developmental dynamics. Enrichment of bacterial pro-inflammatory genes and disruption in fecal metabolites suggest that 6-month sucralose consumption at the human acceptable daily intake (ADI) may increase the risk of developing tissue inflammation by disrupting the gut microbiota, which is supported by elevated pro-inflammatory gene expression in the liver of sucralose-treated mice. Our results highlight the role of sucralose-gut microbiome interaction in regulating host health-related processes, particularly chronic inflammation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphys.2017.00487

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sucralose administration has been reported to elicit microbial changes, specifically in animal models.

    “Sucralose (i.e., Splenda) administration has been reported to elicit microbial changes (e.g., decreased total bacterial abundance; increase in Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Turicibacter, Roseburia, Akkermansia, Clostridiaceae, Christensenellaceae, and Clostridium symbiosium; decrease in Ruminococcus, Streptococcus, Dehalobacterium, Erysipelotrichaceae, and bifidobacteria), specifically in animal”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 258

Authors
Bian, X., Chi, L., Gao, B., Tu, P., Ru, H., & Lu, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2017-07-24
Volume
8
Pages
487-487
ISSN
1664-042X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2739328078
Cited by
258
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • University of Georgia
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES024950, P30ES010126)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
sucralose, artificial sweeteners, gut microbiota, dysbiosis, liver inflammation, chronic inflammation, pro-inflammatory gene expression, fecal metabolites, C57BL/6 mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review